Ring_king Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 The concept of Satan Kid is that he must be destroyed quickly and finished off quickly before he gets too strong. Please give feedback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rawlyn Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 Why is this card a ritual monster? The summoning method isn't a ritual summon...To keep these cards within the OCG standards, I would recommend that you: - Change the monster to an effect monster with an effect along the lines of "This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card can only be Special Summoned by the effect of "Satan's Doll" (and make Satan's Doll a normal or quick-play spell card). This card cannot be destroy by the effects of Spells, Traps or Monster Effects. During your Standby Phase, the ATK and DEF of this card are doubled." (I've left out the "within 600 ATK" and "attack twice" parts because I think that would make it overpowered). (And yes I know, my OCG isn't exactly perfect here either!). Also I think the "remove a FIRE monster from play" part should be on the spell card, with the rest of the summoning conditions (it makes sense to keep it all in one place).OR- Keep it as a ritual monster with the same effects, but make the ritual spell card a proper ritual spell card without the LP cost and removing monsters from play part. Sorry if this doesn't make any sense, but hey - neither do your cards! ;) lol :D Other than the fact that the ritual part is all broken, I like the idea - but think you have added to many effects and overpowered it as a result. With a Gravity Bind or Level Limit Area B on the field, this card would be too strong, so I think it's only fair to let any monster stronger than it capable of destroying it.I also think it should only be able to attack once - think of it's ATK otherwise... Summoned turn: 400 ATK - attack twice, 800 damage so far. Turn 2: 800 ATK - attack twice, 2400 damage so far. Turn 3: 1600 ATK - attack twice, 5600 damage so far... it quickly spirals, so letting it attack only once seems more reasonable to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atomix Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 that was a long post, to make it short, bad cards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rawlyn Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 I'd rather make a long post and make myself clear, than try and compress my ideas into a few words and have nobody understand them. That seems to happen a lot on this forum... so many incomprehensible two-words responses...! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.