shonenhikada Posted May 1, 2008 Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 Malevolent Catastrophe http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Malevolent_Catastrophe i often uses this in conjunction with this cardhttp://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Grave_Squirmer discuss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted May 1, 2008 Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 Hehe, I know. It's an awesome card!It doesn't support OTKs because it only activates in your own card, but it's a good card, that's for sure.I don't run too many of it, though, because it isn't really effective early in the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted May 1, 2008 Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 GS is bad... no one attacks anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kizzi Posted May 1, 2008 Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 GS is bad... no one attacks anymore.No. Grave Squirmer isn't that bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted May 1, 2008 Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 GS is bad... no one attacks anymore.No. Grave Squirmer isn't that bad. give me some good uses for the card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted May 1, 2008 Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 GS will soon be replaced with LS Hunter Raikou. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kizzi Posted May 1, 2008 Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 GS is bad... no one attacks anymore.No. Grave Squirmer isn't that bad.give me some good uses for the card.It's 1-for-1 removal, in DARK form. Are there any DARK decks which wouldn't mind some 1-for-1 removal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shonenhikada Posted May 1, 2008 Author Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 GS is bad... no one attacks anymore.No. Grave Squirmer isn't that bad. give me some good uses for the card. i find grave often helps against taking out jinzo allowing me to use my traps again to destroy cards or allow me to target pesky back row cards or anything else that i worry about. Its good in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted May 1, 2008 Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 GS is bad... no one attacks anymore.No. Grave Squirmer isn't that bad.give me some good uses for the card.It's 1-for-1 removal' date=' in DARK form. Are there any DARK decks which wouldn't mind some 1-for-1 removal?[/quote'] it's just that nowdays people use effect's to get rid of cards. you know? DAD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kizzi Posted May 1, 2008 Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 GS is bad... no one attacks anymore.No. Grave Squirmer isn't that bad.give me some good uses for the card.It's 1-for-1 removal' date=' in DARK form. Are there any DARK decks which wouldn't mind some 1-for-1 removal?[/quote']it's just that nowdays people use effect's to get rid of cards. you know? DAD.Lol. Lrn2play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted May 1, 2008 Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 i like male cat its not amazing but its fair Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted May 1, 2008 Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 ok cards are ok, but nuffing beats ftk in this format, ok in a control format Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted May 1, 2008 Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 The decks that make Malevolent Catastrophe's effect worth using - the decks with a bunch of Continuous Spells and Traps for stall and burn - are the ones that don't attack enough to make Malevolent Catastrophe worthwhile. Unlike Heavy Storm and Sacred Phoenix, Malevolent Catastrophe still gives your opponent the Main Phase 2 in which to Set or activate additional spells and traps to replace those destroyed, so it's not much use for field-clearing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shonenhikada Posted May 1, 2008 Author Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 The decks that make Malevolent Catastrophe's effect worth using - the decks with a bunch of Continuous Spells and Traps for stall and burn - are the ones that don't attack enough to make Malevolent Catastrophe worthwhile. Unlike Heavy Storm and Sacred Phoenix' date=' Malevolent Catastrophe still gives your opponent the Main Phase 2 in which to Set or activate additional spells and traps to replace those destroyed, so it's not much use for field-clearing.[/quote'] well that's your opinion crab not like it's fact or anything in other words to each his own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted May 1, 2008 Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 The decks that make Malevolent Catastrophe's effect worth using - the decks with a bunch of Continuous Spells and Traps for stall and burn - are the ones that don't attack enough to make Malevolent Catastrophe worthwhile. Unlike Heavy Storm and Sacred Phoenix' date=' Malevolent Catastrophe still gives your opponent the Main Phase 2 in which to Set or activate additional spells and traps to replace those destroyed, so it's not much use for field-clearing.[/quote'] well that's your opinion crab not like it's fact or anything in other words to each his own. You're still bad at debate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted May 1, 2008 Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 yhea crab does make a valid point but its probably worth side decking, and it does give normally a +1 or 2 so its not all bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted May 1, 2008 Report Share Posted May 1, 2008 The decks that make Malevolent Catastrophe's effect worth using - the decks with a bunch of Continuous Spells and Traps for stall and burn - are the ones that don't attack enough to make Malevolent Catastrophe worthwhile. Unlike Heavy Storm and Sacred Phoenix' date=' Malevolent Catastrophe still gives your opponent the Main Phase 2 in which to Set or activate additional spells and traps to replace those destroyed, so it's not much use for field-clearing.[/quote'] well that's your opinion crab not like it's fact or anything in other words to each his own. opinion: what you think it's right fact: what really is... and what crab said is a FACT... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.