dudemanpeace Posted May 3, 2008 Report Share Posted May 3, 2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larxene Posted May 3, 2008 Report Share Posted May 3, 2008 this sucks...its just an extremely weak blue-eyes...>.< Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Final Fantasy Revolution Posted May 3, 2008 Report Share Posted May 3, 2008 sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo its exactly the same I think you should have mad Blues White Baby Dragon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2sick4u Posted May 3, 2008 Report Share Posted May 3, 2008 What the heck. =S. I dont get it, so, the title says blue-eyes white dragon, but the picture and description says Ultimate dragon >.<". Okay, well, i can't imagine myself running into a 3 headed dragon with 1500 attack. Its way to unrealistic, confusing, and kind of.. well , lame/stupid. Its not hard to think up card ideas.. But insulting a yu-gi-oh one like this is pretty disappointing =/. Anyway. 1/10.-2sick =]. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
direnzin Posted May 3, 2008 Report Share Posted May 3, 2008 WOWmy bulbasaur and king mickey wur better thn thatlolnaw its ok it was good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Protoman Posted May 3, 2008 Report Share Posted May 3, 2008 bad no worse than bad terrible it is a disgrace to all dragon type monster don't take it the wrong way but its just not good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEF56 Posted May 3, 2008 Report Share Posted May 3, 2008 this card is ok. but it is BLUE-EYES ULTIMATE DRAGON not BLUE EYES WHITE DRAGON Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Flying Toaster Posted May 3, 2008 Report Share Posted May 3, 2008 lol a blue eyes ultimate dragon named as blue eyes white dragon with a pathetic atk and def XD ...this is truly the ultimate card of 2008!! rofl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.