Guest Star Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 The border was required for a contest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOUL Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 Pretty good 9/10 :) Nice picture -Mod Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gary9672001 Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 wow awesome card im jealous >< how did you do teh border? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parting Shot Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 Well, I'm not that familiar with the Lightsworn cards yet, but I do like this card. The border probably could've been a different color to look better, but the image is excellent otherwise. overall - 13.53/13.69 ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanimir Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 They are not "Lightsworn", they are "LightLORDS" >-<This darn translation x-xWell but thats not your fault XDOther than that, very good card ^^ 9.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 The border had to be red. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 ok normally i would tell you the mistakes you madebut since were in the same contest, i am kind of conflicting on this optionso, being the person i am, i will give you a hint, only one, and if you find it and fix it, good for you ^)^ (in time), but if you dont, then i wont have a quilty constionce (whoa major SP)lol so here it is your missing a period.thats itno more no less Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CinnamonStar Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 Is this supposed to be related to the Lightlords or a completely new type of cards?Somehow or other, I'd say it's a balanced card with a pretty good picture.9/10^.^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyhe Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 Is this supposed to be related to the Lightlords or a completely new type of cards?Somehow or other' date=' I'd say it's a balanced card with a pretty good picture.9/10^.^[/quote']Lightsworn means Lightlord.I agree that it is a good card,worth of 9/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skyson Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 ...It's incredibly broken. Lightsworns send stuff to the Graveyard faster than you can blink, and Wolff is a 2100 ATKer that can only be summoned from the Deck. This beats Wolff completely in stats, can take down most threats seen used, and can potentially destroy 3 cards every turn, not including itself. The only potential drawback is that you'll have to start destroying your own cards if you run out of opponent's cards to blow up, but in that situation you still have an open field to direct attack with a 2800 ATKer. 6/10, good idea but way too powerful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
overheat Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 i like it very much its special Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enigma Zero Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 Wulf special summons himself when he is sent from the deck to the graveyard. Shiran does not and requires an additional card to get from the graveyard to the field. I beleive that distinct difference make this card pretty balanced. The only thing I notice about this card is that, compared to the other lightsworn, it's name is backwards. I believe it should be "Shiran, Lightsworn Destroyer". Hope this helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grayall Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 Good idea. I will try to make some Lightsworn monsters later. I think it is balanced. 8.7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shonenhikada Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 pretty good effect, doesn't have to be that high level though or have that ridiculous restriction in summoning it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 It seems like an ok card. but it's effect is basic for you =/Also, it has too many levels...And I know what these lightsworn monsters are (Anybody hear of judgment dragon ;)) Anyway, it's a good overall card, maybe a lil weak on the effect side, but good.8.8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 It had to be Level 10. That was one of the contest rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EliminateHRN Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 Well seems pretty cool andlike the border and picture anyway I also heard os these Lightsworns/Lightlords and they seem pretty good. Anyway I like the card again 8.9/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 To say you want to be on CC you dont half not know the rules. Artist credit? Disclaimer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 Oh, I didn't realize that I had to credit myself. [/sarcasm] I DO CLAIM OWNERSHIP OF THE IMAGE USED ON THIS CARD. IMAGE CREDIT GOES TO REMIX DUELIST OF YCM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 If you own the image YOU DO have to credit yourself, you should have known that. And theres nothing sarcastic about it, its the rules. You need to follow them and set an example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 Actually, I talked to Darth Browarod. invertremix: hola senor n00bcyborg4488: heyinvertremix: ^_^invertremix: sup?cyborg4488: nm. u?invertremix: just got back from schoolinvertremix: =/cyborg4488: lol, I remember schoolcyborg4488: XDinvertremix: lulz >_>cyborg4488: lol, jk\cyborg4488: I actually finished classes last week and had my last final todayinvertremix: what grade?invertremix: 12th?cyborg4488: 13thcyborg4488: lol, freshman in college, in other wordsinvertremix: lolinvertremix: XDinvertremix: Djinvertremix: Now, I don't have to post a disclaimer or credit if I made the image, do I?cyborg4488: well, just say that you made it, and that's all you needinvertremix: Well, I didn't, because I posted the image in Showcase and I said that I made it.cyborg4488: then that's probably fineinvertremix: I don't think that credit is required if the artist (me) has no problem with the person using it.invertremix: Look at Dj's comment >_>cyborg4488: link?invertremix: sureinvertremix: http://forum.yugiohcardmaker.net/showthread.php?tid=42419cyborg4488: lol, that post makes me think he's drunk :Pinvertremix: lulzinvertremix: The rule was made so artist wouldn't get upset about people using their images and not giving credit. Well, I don't care if I use my image, so I didn't give credit.invertremix: ^_6invertremix: ^_^*cyborg4488: lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 Did Browarod write the rules? No. You see why i am slightly concerned about you moving to CC, you cannot even read the rules and then when you are cornered by 1 Moderator, you sneakly move to a different one for their Opinions. Read the rules, follow the rules, any questions, ask me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 No, you see, this rule was put into effect so that artists wouldn't be upset that people were using their images. I did post artist credit in Showcase. Wolfberserker doesn't post credit on his card threads when he uses his own images, so why should I? I'm not sneaking around, I'm making a point. As the creator of this image, I shouldn't need to credit myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junk Raver Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 No' date=' you see, this rule was put into effect so that artists wouldn't be upset that people were using their images.[/b'] I did post artist credit in Showcase. Wolfberserker doesn't post credit on his card threads when he uses his own images, so why should I? I'm not sneaking around, I'm making a point. As the creator of this image, I shouldn't need to credit myself. Bold 1 Again, did you write the rules? Do you even know why it was put into effect? What you stated was only half the reason, the second part to it is that it was insulting to artists for their hard work for us to just use their images, it was made not only to stop their anger, but for us to show their brilliant art and skills. Bold 2 Rules state it must be on your thread, not in another section, many members do not go to showcase thus a common question would arise on your thread of 'artist credit?', it should be on your thread to stop questions arising and to show Moderators that the thread = The Rules. Bold 3 I have seen Wolf post that he owns the images, on his threads, any he hasnt done i would have missed, but i have ensured that any i have seen, should have his credits on, and they do. Bold 4 Your Point = Failure. Bold 5 Yes you should, refer to Bold 3 and the Rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodrun Posted May 14, 2008 Report Share Posted May 14, 2008 No' date=' you see, this rule was put into effect so that artists wouldn't be upset that people were using their images.[/b'] I did post artist credit in Showcase. Wolfberserker doesn't post credit on his card threads when he uses his own images, so why should I? I'm not sneaking around, I'm making a point. As the creator of this image, I shouldn't need to credit myself. Bold 1 Again, did you write the rules? Do you even know why it was put into effect? What you stated was only half the reason, the second part to it is that it was insulting to artists for their hard work for us to just use their images, it was made not only to stop their anger, but for us to show their brilliant art and skills. Bold 2 Rules state it must be on your thread, not in another section, many members do not go to showcase thus a common question would arise on your thread of 'artist credit?', it should be on your thread to stop questions arising and to show Moderators that the thread = The Rules. Bold 3 I have seen Wolf post that he owns the images, on his threads, any he hasnt done i would have missed, but i have ensured that any i have seen, should have his credits on, and they do. Bold 4 Your Point = Failure. Bold 5 Yes you should, refer to Bold 3 and the Rules. Remix, even I mentioned the artist i used, even though it was very little(that fairy, i know took a long time) and im sorry remixbut who are you to say that if someone doesnt do it, you shouldnt have to either?your a moderator, you should setting a good example, not one that, allows members to depict there own rules, and follow very minimum of the actual rules. The reason we have that rule, is because of copyright infrengments (sp), and a very polite, and a very focused, DA member, who was speaking on behalf of the rest of DAand with the help of Kaze, YCMaker, and other mods, we set up a ruleand we are following that ruleare we not? In your "into" thread, did you not state yourself that, there will be no slips of members not following the rules?how is this suppose to look to the members, who were agreeing with you? (a.k.a, me, rahim, and many others)I suggest just follow the rulesand yes i know im not a mod, and i know you dont have to listenand i know you wanted credit for that "custom" image you made, but rules are rules, even though you are a mod >_> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.