Magnisious Posted May 15, 2008 Report Share Posted May 15, 2008 Delete me =D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CinnamonStar Posted May 15, 2008 Report Share Posted May 15, 2008 I'm sorry, but since this is the Realistic Cards section, you're supposed to use IMG tags. So are the rules. If you don't know how that works, feel free to pm me. Also you have to give credit to the artist you got the pictures from.Regarding the cards themselves, the first thing I noticed were the card names. They sound pretty good to me, but I think this would be the correct version for the second one: "Kyron the Archangel". Now let's start with the first one. The effect is good, but the stats are too high for a 3 stars monster. If you ask me, I'd say that 1600 ATK/800 DEF would have been enough. Also, the effect should be: "As long as this card remains face-up on the field, increase your Life Points by 100 for every Spell Card activated." That being said, you didn't need to capitalize "The" in the name and "Angelic" does not exist as a card type. If you intended to create a new type, you should mention that. As much as I like the image you used for the first card, I think you could have found a better one the second. Again, don't put "Angelic" as a type here, unless it's supposed to be a new type you made up yourself.Moreover the correct version of the effect would be: "As long as this card remains face-up on the field, one of the following effects activates.*(Normal Summon: ) When either player Normal Summons a monster, increase the Life Points of each player by 500.*(Special Summon: ) When either player Special Summons a monster, both players draw 1 card.*(Flip Effect: ) When either player uses the Flip effect of a card, increase the Life Points of both players by 100 for each card on the field.When this card is sent to the Graveyard, Special Summon 1 "Angelic Apprentice" in face-up Attack or Defence Position. It definitely has a too strong effect, but at least it's good that you pointed out that it would be a limited card. So it's okay at that point.Furthermore I noticed one other thing about your second card. I guess it's supposed to use only one of its effects per turn because otherwise it would be completely overpowered. On a whole, I'd advice you to work on your OCG and on trying to do more balanced cards in the future.6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyhe Posted May 15, 2008 Report Share Posted May 15, 2008 there's a "no attachment" clause in this section,so post them up like a man that you are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valhalla God Odin Posted May 15, 2008 Report Share Posted May 15, 2008 no attached files in the forum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.