EksDee Posted May 16, 2008 Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 Well, Spellcasters seem to be pretty popular. I run a Spellcaster deck. I was designing this for one of the contests, but they advised against making a fusion based monster. So I figured seeing as she was already drawn at that point, i'd just post her up.The drawing was done for me by a friend. I digitally altered and coloured it, then made up something that almost looks like a background image. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/1003/Ophiuchus/EbonGoddessCard1.jpgThis card will be featuring in a fan made story I am doing at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
overheat Posted May 16, 2008 Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 bad pic. OCG is not good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EksDee Posted May 16, 2008 Author Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 bad pic. OCG is not good Uuh.OCG is essentially identical to that on the Ebon Magician Curran card, except with a number change and the word Graveyard added in correctly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skuldur Posted May 16, 2008 Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 you need to improve your OCG and you might want to fuse her with a reaper card sinceher name is the magical reaper Just a suggestion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Pride Posted May 16, 2008 Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 bad pic. OCG is not good I think it's not bad for a freehand drawing. Also, you may want to add another effect like, "This card cannot be targeted by ..." to make it less underpowered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EksDee Posted May 16, 2008 Author Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 you need to improve your OCG Once again, this is almost word for word what Ebon Magician Curran's card text is. How does it need improving if KONAMI wrote it? Graveyard is meant to be capitalized in that manner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enigma Zero Posted May 16, 2008 Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 Interesting card. The Artwork could use a few minor corrections here and there but the card does what it's supposed to do. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarbleZone Posted May 16, 2008 Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 "During your Standby Phase, inflict 100 damage to your opponent for each monster in their Graveyard." Newest correct OCG. Yours was pretty close, but it was old OCG, and you didn't use possessives. ("opponent's" instead of "opponents", for example. ;)) As for the card itself, well, couldn't you have made it a bit more original? Other than that, no complaints on my part. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EksDee Posted May 16, 2008 Author Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 "During your Standby Phase' date=' inflict 100 damage to your opponent for each monster in their Graveyard." Newest correct OCG. Yours was pretty close, but it was old OCG, and you didn't use possessives. ("opponent's" instead of "opponents", for example. ;)) As for the card itself, well, couldn't you have made it a bit more original? Other than that, no complaints on my part. ;)[/quote']Wait, Konami re-printed Ebon Magician with new text? :(Originality... Probably~ It'd probably help if I explained it's useage in the story it's designed for... Basically, the character with this card is someone who vehementally REFUSES to remove the Ebon Magician Curran card from their deck. No matter what. (I do this too, IRL)Over the course of the story, EMC does manage to save the character a few times. So naturally towards the end, it needed an advanced version. That was this card - What'd happen later in the Curran's life if she didn't make it to princess and focussed more heavily on dark arts. As such, I needed a... well, Dark Magician. The most prominent one is the classic variety, so he got used. Hence why she looks a bit like a dark version of Valkyria. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enigma Zero Posted May 16, 2008 Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 What Blackwind is attempting to explain to you is that as the game progresses the OCG(Official Card Grammar) also evolves. This means that although they are existing cards, some of the older cards show their age when compared to the newer OCG, which is(in most cases) better for the reader. So it's not so much a matter of you being wrong as it's a matter of the version Blackwind presented being more right within the current game. You think this little bit is something...wait until they remove Tribute and Tribute Summon from the game(which is about to happen soon) and replace them with Release and Advance Summon. It's going to be a global trainwreck. :lol: I hope this helped to explain things better. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EksDee Posted May 16, 2008 Author Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 What Blackwind is attempting to explain to you is that as the game progresses the OCG(Official Card Grammar) also evolves. This means that although they are existing cards' date=' some of the older cards show their age when compared to the newer OCG, which is(in most cases) better for the reader. So it's not so much a matter of you being wrong as it's a matter of the version Blackwind presented being more right within the current game. You think this little bit is something...wait until they remove Tribute and Tribute Summon from the game(which is about to happen soon) and replace them with Release and Advance Summon. It's going to be a global trainwreck. :lol: I hope this helped to explain things better. ;)[/quote'] Wait, what? Release and Advance? ...reference page so I can get used to this, please?:?I am totally -not- going to change when that does. Tribute Summon is a Tribute Summon. Forever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enigma Zero Posted May 16, 2008 Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 Click Me ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.