Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan Posted November 21, 2021 Report Share Posted November 21, 2021 Extra Dimensional Portal Quick-Play Spell You can only activate 1 card with this card’s name per turn. (1) Both Players reveal their Extra Deck, then if both players share at least 1 monster card type (Fusion, Synchro, Xyz, or Link) in their Extra Deck declare 1 monster card type (Fusion, Synchro, Xyz, or Link), and if you do, both players must banish face-down as many monsters of the declared type as possible (min. 1), then, negate the effects of all monsters of that type while they are on the field, also banish any monsters of that type that leaves the field while players currently control them. In response to this card's activation, your opponent cannot activate the effects of monsters, with the same original type (Fusion, Synchro, Xyz, or Link) as the declared monster card type. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayfield Lumina Posted November 21, 2021 Report Share Posted November 21, 2021 Mmm... extremely overpowered effect that is bound to cause a lot of trouble, regardless of if the card affects the user as well or not. There are Decks that can work perfectly fine without Extra Deck, so just them having a small collection of all kinds let them use this card to fullest potential. Massive info obtained from a single card, massive losses for the opponent, massive floodgate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan Posted November 21, 2021 Author Report Share Posted November 21, 2021 2 hours ago, Rayfield Lumina said: Mmm... extremely overpowered effect that is bound to cause a lot of trouble, regardless of if the card affects the user as well or not. There are Decks that can work perfectly fine without Extra Deck, so just them having a small collection of all kinds let them use this card to fullest potential. Massive info obtained from a single card, massive losses for the opponent, massive floodgate. Sorry this my be way to strong Floowandereeze would be way more OP with this card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loleo Posted November 22, 2021 Report Share Posted November 22, 2021 On 11/21/2021 at 3:14 PM, Zefra Zamazenta said: Sorry this my be way to strong Floowandereeze would be way more OP with this card. Even outside of Flundereeze this card could be played in everything just side in 1 of every extra deck type and side this card then play it if your opponent's main type is different then yours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokutah Posted November 29, 2021 Report Share Posted November 29, 2021 as many above me have said this is too OP but i need to point out that even before all the effects is apply, the revealing extra deck part of the cost is already a huge intelligence advantage of its own Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan Posted November 29, 2021 Author Report Share Posted November 29, 2021 1 minute ago, Dokutah Gory, Woundslinger said: as many above me have said this is too OP but i need to point out that even before all the effects is apply, the revealing extra deck part of the cost is already a huge intelligence advantage of its own How is it a Cost? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokutah Posted November 29, 2021 Report Share Posted November 29, 2021 22 minutes ago, Zefra Zamazenta said: How is it a Cost? anything behind [ : ] [ ,] [ ; ] is consider cost or requirement as far as i know it your text: Both Players reveal their Extra Deck, then if both players share at least 1 monster card type (Fusion, Synchro, Xyz, or Link) in their Extra Deck declare 1 monster card type (Fusion, Synchro, Xyz, or Link) [ ,] and if you do, both players must banish face-down as many monsters of the declared type as possible (min. 1), then, negate the effects of all monsters of that type while they are on the field, a Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tripledawn Posted November 29, 2021 Report Share Posted November 29, 2021 The way you wrote the card, everything you placed before the declaration of the card type should be part of the cost and activation requirements. That's because only after you declare, does your get his response options (or lack thereof). So that's where you'd put a semicolon (this mark ':') Regardless of your opponent responding, you already know the entire content of their Extra Deck. And if it goes through, most decks would be left crippled for the rest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loleo Posted November 29, 2021 Report Share Posted November 29, 2021 16 hours ago, Dokutah Gory, Woundslinger said: anything behind [ : ] [ ,] [ ; ] is consider cost or requirement as far as i know it your text: Both Players reveal their Extra Deck, then if both players share at least 1 monster card type (Fusion, Synchro, Xyz, or Link) in their Extra Deck declare 1 monster card type (Fusion, Synchro, Xyz, or Link) [ ,] and if you do, both players must banish face-down as many monsters of the declared type as possible (min. 1), then, negate the effects of all monsters of that type while they are on the field, a Anything behind ; is a cost Anything behind : is an activation requirement , just separate clauses Since there is no ; negating the card would prevent both players from revealing their extra decks, but if there was a ; after the reveal clause even if the card was negated both players would need to reveal their extradecks. 12 hours ago, tripledawn said: The way you wrote the card, everything you placed before the declaration of the card type should be part of the cost and activation requirements. That's because only after you declare, does your get his response options (or lack thereof). So that's where you'd put a semicolon (this mark ':') Regardless of your opponent responding, you already know the entire content of their Extra Deck. And if it goes through, most decks would be left crippled for the rest. : this is a colon ; this is a semicolon This card has no cost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokutah Posted November 30, 2021 Report Share Posted November 30, 2021 ah yes @Loleo i kinda forgot that part a bit that being said however it still dont make this okay card @Zefra Zamazenta rebalance still needed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loleo Posted November 30, 2021 Report Share Posted November 30, 2021 1 hour ago, Dokutah Gory, Woundslinger said: ah yes @Loleo i kinda forgot that part a bit that being said however it still dont make this okay card @Zefra Zamazenta rebalance still needed yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.