TFG (My First Few Cards in a Long Time)

[Titus]

 

 

 

So...what do you think of them? I know I'm kinda rusty; I haven't made any cards since last year (if you look at my other cards, you'll see all of them say in the corner "2007") so I need some more practice. ;)

[Machovict]

Machvict's Official Card Rating:

 

1. Good, but a tad overpowered (I sacrifice my "Swordsman of Landstar" to Special Summon my "Super Conductor Tyranno"!).

2. Interesting effect.

3. Good.

 

Overall you did a great job ;)! Keep up the good work!

[Titus]

Thank you. ;)

[v8561v]

Well, it's a bit bad,but ok.The first is overpowered.

The second card's effect needs more explanation and cost for its effect.The 3rd cards should be a Trap.

[Zeroshot]

Remove 1 monster on your side of the field from play to Special Summon 1 monster from your Graveyard.

 

Card 2,

 

Spell and Trap Cards

I do not believe Vice Versa is in the OCG language.

 

Card 3

 

You do not need to add: as long as they remain on the field to the end. Just end it: Monsters summoned this way cannot declare an attack.

 

My Rating: 7/10.

Good.

[Titus]

v8561v, I don't think the 2nd card needs a cost since your opponent can use the effect as well. And why should the 3rd card be a trap? It works fine as a spell.

 

The Virus,

 

1. Are you trying to tell me to change the period to "to"? Because doing that has no effect on the card.

 

2. Since I haven't been here since last year, you don't know how I am. I hate when cards don't look perfect, and the lines of text aren't even on the card. Even though it's not by much, this bothers me so much:

 

 

3. Ahh, I didn't put "declare an attack" because of what I said in #2, but I did change it. ;) Thanks.

[andu_vlad]

[br]Click here to feed me a Star Fruit![br]Get your own at Flyffables!

[Titus]

Wow, that was fast (andu vlad getting banned).

[Guest Supreme Gamesmaster]

Image credit.

[Titus]

I don't have anyone to give credit to. I googled the pics.

[Guest Supreme Gamesmaster]

Then say that.

 

The cards are pretty damn good, but T&SV can be majorly abused; it would certainly be limited, if not banned.

[Titus]

I've never had to before...didn't think I had to now.

 

About T&SV, yeah, I know. But not all cards anyone can make can be perfect. And thanks for the comment. ;)

[Kale]

these cards are pretty cool! I would definetly use the first one, and the rainbow hole could be used in an annoying way with your opponent. ^_^

 

Oh, and for many spaces above where they said vise versa isn't in ocg, they were wrong.

 

Back when spells were magic cards, I remember clearly that vise versa was written on one. Sorry I have no proof, but I know it at least was part of ocg at one point. ^_^

[Titus]

I would think Rainbow Hole has potential with other cards. Because, used by itself, it really wouldn't be good. The monsters can't attack, but they can still be used for other things like tributes. Imagine giving your opponent 2 free tributes for a Blue-Eyes or something.

 

lol Well, thanks for that. And vice-versa's probably not acceptable in Yu-Gi-Oh! any more, though. Yu-Gi-Oh! used to just be a fun card game, but when it became so big and popular, it also became very technical. Raigeki: "Destroys all monsters on your opponent's side of the field." With that being said, we knew and still know exactly what that meant, but now "Destroys" would be a mistake, because it would have to just say "Destroy". Not a big problem, but if that happened on one of the newer cards, it would be a typo.

[YugiohGX911]

They are really great cards! I would have to agree though; the first one is a bit overpowered. However, it's not a big concern.:P To use it effectively, you actually need good cards in your Graveyard. I guess I could say that it's like Monster Reborn, except it actually has a cost. Besides that, I would give your cards a 9.999999/10! :D

[Titus]

Thanks. :D

 

And I added a new card. I'll be adding more as I make them.

[Kizzi]

Overpowered. Abusable.

Underpowered. Pointless.

Underpowered. Pointless.

Underpowered. Pointless.

[Titus]

Ok, well, thanks for the comment.

[302930]

Time & space vortex is a bit broken, bout the others are pretty good. 7.586/10 :)

[Titus]

Thank you. :)

[Guest Supreme Gamesmaster]

Lizard Rider is killer, but it would get in a crazy, duel-destroying loop if it were used on The Wicked Avatar.

 

Do you have any idea how broken the Mermaid card is? It annihilates Final Countdown decks.

 

If it weren't for Pyra's relative weakness, it would be broken. Unfortunately, combine it with Raregold Armor and you'll win the duel in eight turns or less.

 

For all of them, Summon and Set need to be capitalized.

[Titus]

Lizard Rider is killer' date=' but it would get in a crazy, duel-destroying loop if it were used on The Wicked Avatar.

 

Do you have any idea how [i']broken[/i] the Mermaid card is? It annihilates Final Countdown decks.

 

If it weren't for Pyra's relative weakness, it would be broken. Unfortunately, combine it with Raregold Armor and you'll win the duel in eight turns or less.

 

For all of them, Summon and Set need to be capitalized.

 

Ahh! I forgot about The Wicked Avatar. It's only meant for it to be 500 more at the time it's summoned, so it would be 500 more than The Wicked Avatar's ATK and then TWA's ATK would go up by another 600, but then Lizard's ATK wouldn't change after. Guess I gotta change it.

 

No, because Pyra would still be affected by all effects. If you're opponent can't stop Pyra with a spell, trap, or monster effect, then he/she deserves to lose anyway.

 

Set isn't in any of the effects, and I thought summon was only capitalized when there was a certain kind of summon (ex. Fusion Summon, Special Summon, Tribute Summon). I can't find an example where they don't have a specific summon on the card. Every card I'm looking at is like Normal Summon, Flip Summon, Special Summon, etc.