CJEA_XTIAN Posted April 28 Report Share Posted April 28 (edited) Urphiel, The High Arckcestial Urphiel, The High Arckcestial LIGHT Rank 4 [ Spellcaster/Xyz/Effect ] 3 Level 4 Spellcaster-Type monsters Gains 300 ATK and DEF for each material attached to it. During the Main Phase, when your opponent activates a monster effect (Quick Effect): You can detach 1 material from this card; negate the activation, and if you do, destroy that monster. You can only use each of the following effects of "Urphiel, The High Arckcestial" once per turn. During the Battle Phase (Quick Effect): You can detach 1 material from this card; all face-up monsters your opponent curently controls lose 300 ATK for each LIGHT monster in your GY. During the End Phase: You can send 1 "Arckcestial" monster from your Deck to the GY. ATK/ 3000 DEF/300 Master Duel Summon Cut-In! What are your thoughts of this card I made, specially the slight revisions? Edited April 30 by CJEA_XTIAN UPDATES!!! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazerSwordKirbo Posted April 28 Report Share Posted April 28 The cut in looks really cool, but I think that the three spellcaster investment is a little steep for a monster negate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJEA_XTIAN Posted April 28 Author Report Share Posted April 28 5 hours ago, LazerSwordKirbo said: The cut in looks really cool, but I think that the three spellcaster investment is a little steep for a monster negate. Is it costly? or should I replace it with 'card or effects'. I'm planning to make main deck monster that can summon this one even in the first turn. Or making a monster counterpart for negating Spell/Trap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazerSwordKirbo Posted April 28 Report Share Posted April 28 46 minutes ago, CJEA_XTIAN said: Is it costly? or should I replace it with 'card or effects'. I'm planning to make main deck monster that can summon this one even in the first turn. Or making a monster counterpart for negating Spell/Trap. If you are going to give this an archetypal way to summon it then that is a different story. Having a one card combo that gets this thing out then there isn’t a problem with its power level. I saw that the materials were semi-generic and assumed it would be generic support for spellcasters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJEA_XTIAN Posted April 28 Author Report Share Posted April 28 2 minutes ago, LazerSwordKirbo said: If you are going to give this an archetypal way to summon it then that is a different story. Having a one card combo that gets this thing out then there isn’t a problem with its power level. I saw that the materials were semi-generic and assumed it would be generic support for spellcasters. I'm adjusting the materials. I'm going to include like "3 Level 4 'archetype' monster". Going to revise the name too. Been thinking of punchier name. :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan Posted April 29 Report Share Posted April 29 Nah this thing is fine its way more balanced that Shock Master. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJEA_XTIAN Posted April 29 Author Report Share Posted April 29 3 minutes ago, Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan said: Nah this thing is fine its way more balanced that Shock Master. I'm changing the name. HAHAHAH. and that Xyx monster has a supporting field spell and synchro monster. I'm just doing the MD style and revisions on some effects 3 minutes ago, Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan said: Nah this thing is fine its way more balanced that Shock Master. I'm changing the name. HAHAHAH. and that Xyx monster has a supporting field spell and synchro monster. I'm just doing the MD style and revisions on some effects Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jakkapat Posted April 29 Report Share Posted April 29 Ahh, I love it. Damn the card art, the editing, and the way you present it. It looks really nice. This monster is quite powerful. But for me it's not too over the top. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ObexKing Posted April 29 Report Share Posted April 29 How on god's green earth did you do this and can please be my teacher. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan Posted April 29 Report Share Posted April 29 2 hours ago, CJEA_XTIAN said: I'm changing the name. HAHAHAH. and that Xyx monster has a supporting field spell and synchro monster. I'm just doing the MD style and revisions on some effects I'm changing the name. HAHAHAH. and that Xyx monster has a supporting field spell and synchro monster. I'm just doing the MD style and revisions on some effects Alright you don't need to archetype lock this guy he is balanced it needs 3 Level 4's. But sounds good for the field spell and same change is fine. Materials are balanced they don't make this guy busted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJEA_XTIAN Posted April 29 Author Report Share Posted April 29 45 minutes ago, Jakkapat said: Ahh, I love it. Damn the card art, the editing, and the way you present it. It looks really nice. This monster is quite powerful. But for me it's not too over the top. Thanks for the appreciation! The whole took me a day from conceptualization, editing, and all! I'm trying not to make OP cards. Balanced cards are the best. 46 minutes ago, ObexKing said: How on god's green earth did you do this and can please be my teacher. I'm not that good. I only use Photoshop. LOL 51 minutes ago, Jakkapat said: Ahh, I love it. Damn the card art, the editing, and the way you present it. It looks really nice. This monster is quite powerful. But for me it's not too over the top. THANK YOU!!! Glad everyone's appreciating what I'm trying to do. Good to know that the monster I made is not that OP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ObexKing Posted April 29 Report Share Posted April 29 5 minutes ago, CJEA_XTIAN said: I'm not that good. I only use Photoshop. LOL Bullshit that is an absolute masterpiece and I still want you to teach me. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJEA_XTIAN Posted April 29 Author Report Share Posted April 29 8 minutes ago, ObexKing said: Bullshit that is an absolute masterpiece and I still want you to teach me. Thanks, but I'm not a good teacher. Should I post the full artwork of the monster? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ObexKing Posted April 29 Report Share Posted April 29 5 minutes ago, CJEA_XTIAN said: Thanks, but I'm not a good teacher. Should I post the full artwork of the monster? Y E S Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan Posted April 29 Report Share Posted April 29 These cards are balanced though don't change their effects. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJEA_XTIAN Posted April 29 Author Report Share Posted April 29 Just now, Zamazenta the OS-Tan Fan said: These cards are balanced though don't change their effects. I'll just change the name. I'm still struggling with the archetype. Lol 2 minutes ago, ObexKing said: Y E S Maybe later once I have decided with the final archetype. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ObexKing Posted April 29 Report Share Posted April 29 3 minutes ago, CJEA_XTIAN said: I'll just change the name. I'm still struggling with the archetype. Lol Maybe later once I have decided with the final archetype. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazerSwordKirbo Posted April 29 Report Share Posted April 29 13 minutes ago, CJEA_XTIAN said: I'll just change the name. I'm still struggling with the archetype. Lol Might I suggest the name “Arcestial”? As a mix between Archangels and Celestials. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJEA_XTIAN Posted April 29 Author Report Share Posted April 29 11 minutes ago, LazerSwordKirbo said: Might I suggest the name “Arcestial”? As a mix between Archangels and Celestials. NICCEEEEEEE. THAT'S FIRE!. Also I came up with "Himmelchorian" 12 minutes ago, LazerSwordKirbo said: Might I suggest the name “Arcestial”? As a mix between Archangels and Celestials. Can I use the archetype you suggested? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ObexKing Posted April 29 Report Share Posted April 29 1 minute ago, CJEA_XTIAN said: NICCEEEEEEE. THAT'S FIRE!. Also I came up with "Himmelchorian" Can I use the archetype you suggested? I'm sure he'll be ok with it 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJEA_XTIAN Posted April 29 Author Report Share Posted April 29 UPDATED CARD Y'ALL!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ObexKing Posted April 29 Report Share Posted April 29 23 minutes ago, CJEA_XTIAN said: UPDATED CARD Y'ALL!!!! Be honest. How long did it take you to change all of it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJEA_XTIAN Posted April 29 Author Report Share Posted April 29 3 minutes ago, ObexKing said: Be honest. How long did it take you to change all of it? 2 minutes, I think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LazerSwordKirbo Posted April 29 Report Share Posted April 29 8 hours ago, CJEA_XTIAN said: NICCEEEEEEE. THAT'S FIRE!. Also I came up with "Himmelchorian" Can I use the archetype you suggested? That’s why I suggested it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ObexKing Posted April 29 Report Share Posted April 29 28 minutes ago, CJEA_XTIAN said: 2 minutes, I think. Wow that is surprisingly not long 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.