N00B Hunter Posted May 24, 2008 Report Share Posted May 24, 2008 Here's my Noble Warrior set! I've been sitting on this for a while, and after I finally made the support cards I decided to "publish" it in the finished sets forum! please rate the cards & looks for OCG and stuff!!http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa295/Leturnmaster/xenopic-1.jpg these guys were support cards I made for a contest, are they balanced? I'm not sure about Noble Focus, but I think Elemental Completion is alright... EDIT: In response to those of you who have pointed out OCG, I fixed all the problems I saw that needed fixing, so please enjoy! :mrgreen: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noble Legend Posted May 24, 2008 Report Share Posted May 24, 2008 AWESOME CARDS!!!!! Love them 10/10 Also Bunny of Magic - I wanna steal that "Elemental Completion" for my set :D Jks, I wouldn't steal ;o But once again, perfect 10/10 Noble Focus.... Now wouldn't that card be good for a Counter Trap? Krypto has a small OCG error "This card cannot declare an attack unless its target is your opponent's Life Points". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HelioSpark Posted May 24, 2008 Report Share Posted May 24, 2008 I found an OCGin Xeno Noble Warrior of the Shining Mist, It says "...you may Special Summon a monster with the words "Noble Warrior"...." "the words" is not needed. Very very good job on the whole Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skarlet Posted May 25, 2008 Report Share Posted May 25, 2008 nice but I would change Blazing Mist's effect to state: "This card can only attack your opponents life points directly. Once per turn during your standby you may pay 1000 life points to increase thiscards ATK by 1000." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neiko Posted May 25, 2008 Report Share Posted May 25, 2008 well there is alot of errors.... just for example the first one:1. this is not optional must be in () to be correct2.Speciffcaly designate noble monsters? alittle wierd, but can be monsters with "Noble Warrior" in the name. Argo's errors:1.this card cannot attack your opponents monsters-This card may not declare an attack to an opponents monster.2. seconed should be- If your opponent declares an attack with a monster with 4 stars or less,you may change the attack target to this card. it is ok in the end 6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skarlet Posted May 25, 2008 Report Share Posted May 25, 2008 correction A level 4 or lower monster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N00B Hunter Posted May 25, 2008 Author Report Share Posted May 25, 2008 alright... wowKrypto has a small OCG error "This card cannot declare an attack unless its target is your opponent's Life Points". its the "it" vs. "is"' date=' isn't it? (that sounds so weird to say 'it is isn't it?'... lol) i will change thatI found an OCGin Xeno Noble Warrior of the Shining Mist, It says "...you may Special Summon a monster with the words "Noble Warrior"...." "the words" is not needed. Very very good job on the whole I am sorry, but that's wrong. Any monster with the words noble warrior in it can be summoned, (I'm going on the assumption that TCG doesn't have any tribute monsters w/"Noble Warrior" in their names, and won't be coming out w/any) summoning lvl 4 monsters is good, and i might make something like "Servant of the Noble Warriors" or something too... nice but I would change Blazing Mist's effect to state: "This card can only attack your opponents life points directly. Once per turn during your standby you may pay 1000 life points to increase thiscards ATK by 1000." ok... bad idea. the first part makes it sounds like blazing is able to attack the opponent's life points directly with his effect' date=' and he can't. the second part i don't like because maybe you or your opponent has an effect that increases the LP payment, so this is that extra tidbit which accounts for his still-quote-low ATK and discourages more LP payment. I am going to change it to "by the amount you payed as a result of this effect's activation", because that works better. well there is alot of errors.... just for example the first one:1. this is not optional must be in () to be correct2.Speciffcaly designate noble monsters? alittle wierd, but can be monsters with "Noble Warrior" in the name. Argo's errors:1.this card cannot attack your opponents monsters-This card may not declare an attack to an opponents monster.2. seconed should be- If your opponent declares an attack with a monster with 4 stars or less,you may change the attack target to this card. it is ok in the end 6/10 some valid points, but a lot of fluff...I will change the "optional" part, but specifically designating noble warriors is important, because Neo shouldn't be helping cards that aren't a part of the 6 noble warriors to begin with (eg. my "servant of the noble warriors" comment: I don't want him protected, just the 6 card set of Nobles)Argo's errors:1. "cannot declare an attack to an opponent's monster" is horrible OCG. "This card may not attack your opponent's monsters" is perfect -- i don't see your problem with it.2. And I will change "four" to "4", but it's not a "may". It always happens, there's no choice. the reason is for the balance that the effect provides. If I made it an option, then this card would be overpowered, letting the person use a powerful defense whenever they desired, and just for the cost of not attacking monsters! It's not like he's going to attack in the first place (this is a stall card after all... or did you not notice that?), so some other form of balance is needed. correction A level 4 or lower monster.I will do that... tomorrow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.