Pharaoh_Atem Posted June 5, 2008 Report Share Posted June 5, 2008 I like the image... Which is fine. That doesn't make the card good. Is a card ALWAYS supposed to be good? Better games have better cards show up more often. So' date=' yes. Wouldn't anybody just consider putting a card in their Deck because it looks cool? Folks do it all the time. That doesn't make them smart or preferable for it. Why would that ever happen? Irrelevant. Give them a break! From what' date=' the truth?[/quote'] Sure, why not? If a person cannot handle the truth, they are at fault and need to depart. The truth does not need to depart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purple Dinosaur Posted June 5, 2008 Report Share Posted June 5, 2008 Give them a break! From what' date=' the truth?[/quote'] Sure, why not? If a person cannot handle the truth, they are at fault and need to depart The truth does not need to depart. Exactly what are you saying here, that I need to depart? I was here longer than you and you suddenly tell me to leave. Very inadequate post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pharaoh_Atem Posted June 5, 2008 Report Share Posted June 5, 2008 Give them a break! From what' date=' the truth?[/quote'] Sure, why not? If a person cannot handle the truth, they are at fault and need to depart The truth does not need to depart. Exactly what are you saying here, that I need to depart? I was here longer than you and you suddenly tell me to leave. Very inadequate post. If you can't handle what someone else says, and that person is telling the truth, the problem is with you, and you need to depart whereever the truth's being told. Seniority in regard to having been at a place... does not change this. If anything, seniority is irrelevant in regard to the matter of dealing with what someone has to say. So, yeah, you leaving the topic would work to solve your problem of being unable to cope. You wouldn't have to deal with the fact that I just-so-happen to have repeatedly expressed a fact that you dislike. Of course, you leaving the topic doesn't magically change the facts; the only difference would be that you'd be able to believe something contradictory to those facts, without me obstructing it. I'd find the post to be quite adequate, seeing how it's actually correct. So, I guess, you can either deal with the matter by lying to yourself, or not - location's not all that relevant to the matter. The point is that the person who tells the truth... never needs to give anyone a break, as any fault in such a case lies only on those who can't handle the truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purple Dinosaur Posted June 5, 2008 Report Share Posted June 5, 2008 Give them a break! From what' date=' the truth?[/quote'] Sure, why not? If a person cannot handle the truth, they are at fault and need to depart The truth does not need to depart. Exactly what are you saying here, that I need to depart? I was here longer than you and you suddenly tell me to leave. Very inadequate post. If you can't handle what someone else says, and that person is telling the truth, the problem is with you, and you need to depart whereever the truth's being told. Seniority in regard to having been at a place... does not change this. If anything, seniority is irrelevant in regard to the matter of dealing with what someone has to say. So, yeah, you leaving the topic would work to solve your problem of being unable to cope. You wouldn't have to deal with the fact that I just-so-happen to have repeatedly expressed a fact that you dislike. Of course, you leaving the topic doesn't magically change the facts; the only difference would be that you'd be able to believe something contradictory to those facts, without me obstructing it. I'd find the post to be quite adequate, seeing how it's actually correct. So, I guess, you can either deal with the matter by lying to yourself, or not - location's not all that relevant to the matter. The point is that the person who tells the truth... never needs to give anyone a break, as any fault in such a case lies only on those who can't handle the truth. It's not a fault to think or to imagine. What you've said in almost every single post you've quoted from me says that I cannot tell something without it being "irrelevant". Which may be true, but I still have my human right to say something. Thinking + Lying to myself = not the same thing. It's true what you said about the truth and something about faults and contradictions, however I can handle the truth. I had some problems with Crab Helmet before, but, he was so generous into telling me exactly what I was doing wrong. I see this is also what you are trying to do, yet imagining is not what I would consider "wrong". I'm not trying to insult you in any way, I'm just saying, you've quoted me a lot today (wow, one day!) and every single one of those quotes has something to do with a statement of mine being wrongly expressed. I cannot disagree with that, however, you've come a little bit too strong in some cases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pharaoh_Atem Posted June 5, 2008 Report Share Posted June 5, 2008 Give them a break! From what' date=' the truth?[/quote'] Sure, why not? If a person cannot handle the truth, they are at fault and need to depart The truth does not need to depart. Exactly what are you saying here, that I need to depart? I was here longer than you and you suddenly tell me to leave. Very inadequate post. If you can't handle what someone else says, and that person is telling the truth, the problem is with you, and you need to depart whereever the truth's being told. Seniority in regard to having been at a place... does not change this. If anything, seniority is irrelevant in regard to the matter of dealing with what someone has to say. So, yeah, you leaving the topic would work to solve your problem of being unable to cope. You wouldn't have to deal with the fact that I just-so-happen to have repeatedly expressed a fact that you dislike. Of course, you leaving the topic doesn't magically change the facts; the only difference would be that you'd be able to believe something contradictory to those facts, without me obstructing it. I'd find the post to be quite adequate, seeing how it's actually correct. So, I guess, you can either deal with the matter by lying to yourself, or not - location's not all that relevant to the matter. The point is that the person who tells the truth... never needs to give anyone a break, as any fault in such a case lies only on those who can't handle the truth. It's not a fault to think or to imagine. It is a fault to believe something that is incorrect. Also, you're drawing things away from the original point we made - that of "giving folks a break from the truth". What you've said in almost every single post you've quoted from me says that I cannot tell something without it being "irrelevant". No' date=' they say what they say beneath what I've quoted from you. The only points at which what was said in response was "Irrelevant" may be found above, in seperate instances - the instance of seniority on a forum is irrelevant, just as the instance of why someone would use a card solely because of the picture... is irrelevant as well. Which may be true, but I still have my human right to say something. The human right to express does not convey a right to say without fear of criticism. Thinking + Lying to myself = not the same thing. Believing something that is not in concert with the facts + Lying to one's self = the same thing. It's true what you said about the truth and something about faults and contradictions' date=' however I can handle the truth.[/quote'] The relevance to the matter of giving folks a break from the truth... is hard to find. Get to the point. I had some problems with Crab Helmet before' date=' but, he was so generous into telling me exactly what I was doing wrong. I see this is also what you are trying to do, yet imagining is not what I would consider "wrong".[/quote'] You clearly misunderstand the above posts. Go reread. I'm not trying to insult you in any way' date='[/quote'] If you think anyone of proper cognition would be insulted through the gamut so far, you need to reasses what proper conditions of insulting are. I'm just saying' date=' you've quoted me a lot today (wow, one day!) and every single one of those quotes has something to do with a statement of mine being wrongly expressed.[/quote'] Incorrect. Your original statement of "Give them a break" wasn't wrongly expressed, was it? Did I ever say it was wrongly expressed? No. I cannot disagree with that' date=' however, you've come a little bit too strong in some cases.[/quote'] You'll cope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purple Dinosaur Posted June 5, 2008 Report Share Posted June 5, 2008 Give them a break! From what' date=' the truth?[/quote'] Sure, why not? If a person cannot handle the truth, they are at fault and need to depart The truth does not need to depart. Exactly what are you saying here, that I need to depart? I was here longer than you and you suddenly tell me to leave. Very inadequate post. If you can't handle what someone else says, and that person is telling the truth, the problem is with you, and you need to depart whereever the truth's being told. Seniority in regard to having been at a place... does not change this. If anything, seniority is irrelevant in regard to the matter of dealing with what someone has to say. So, yeah, you leaving the topic would work to solve your problem of being unable to cope. You wouldn't have to deal with the fact that I just-so-happen to have repeatedly expressed a fact that you dislike. Of course, you leaving the topic doesn't magically change the facts; the only difference would be that you'd be able to believe something contradictory to those facts, without me obstructing it. I'd find the post to be quite adequate, seeing how it's actually correct. So, I guess, you can either deal with the matter by lying to yourself, or not - location's not all that relevant to the matter. The point is that the person who tells the truth... never needs to give anyone a break, as any fault in such a case lies only on those who can't handle the truth. It's not a fault to think or to imagine. It is a fault to believe something that is incorrect. Also, you're drawing things away from the original point we made - that of "giving folks a break from the truth". What you've said in almost every single post you've quoted from me says that I cannot tell something without it being "irrelevant". No' date=' they say what they say beneath what I've quoted from you. The only points at which what was said in response was "Irrelevant" may be found above, in seperate instances - the instance of seniority on a forum is irrelevant, just as the instance of why someone would use a card solely because of the picture... is irrelevant as well. Which may be true, but I still have my human right to say something. The human right to express does not convey a right to say without fear of criticism. Thinking + Lying to myself = not the same thing. Believing something that is not in concert with the facts + Lying to one's self = the same thing. It's true what you said about the truth and something about faults and contradictions' date=' however I can handle the truth.[/quote'] The relevance to the matter of giving folks a break from the truth... is hard to find. Get to the point. I had some problems with Crab Helmet before' date=' but, he was so generous into telling me exactly what I was doing wrong. I see this is also what you are trying to do, yet imagining is not what I would consider "wrong".[/quote'] You clearly misunderstand the above posts. Go reread. I'm not trying to insult you in any way' date='[/quote'] If you think anyone of proper cognition would be insulted through the gamut so far, you need to reasses what proper conditions of insulting are. I'm just saying' date=' you've quoted me a lot today (wow, one day!) and every single one of those quotes has something to do with a statement of mine being wrongly expressed.[/quote'] Incorrect. Your original statement of "Give them a break" wasn't wrongly expressed, was it? Did I ever say it was wrongly expressed? No. I cannot disagree with that' date=' however, you've come a little bit too strong in some cases.[/quote'] You'll cope. Even though you've criticized my every statement, you're still a pretty cool member. I respect you, but don't go too far. And on the plus side, you've increased your Post Count be quite a bit! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.