Joe Riglar Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAG Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 You do realize that the Seal of Orichalcos already exists, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Riglar Posted June 1, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 I know its way to small so it says : As long as this card remains face-up on the field, all monsters controlled by the controller of this card are treated as Dark monsters. Increase the attack of al face-up Dark monsters on the field by 500 points. Yes, that includes the monsters treated as dark monsters by this card's first effect. The controller of this card may use his/her magic and trap card zones as monster zones. Any monsters placed in magic and trap zones by this card's effect cannot be designated as an attack target unless the controller of those monsters have no monsters in their monster card zones. This card cannot be destroyed by a magic, trap or monster effect card that does not contain "Orichalcos" in it's card name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KAJN Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 This thread should be moved to the POP culture section. ~REPORTED~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kale Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 You do realize that the Seal of Orichalcos already exists' date=' right?[/quote'] it doesn't exist. But it is an already created card, yes. One thing that you're missing though is pic credit. 1/10 for no originality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atomix Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 Also wrong section Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAG Posted June 1, 2008 Report Share Posted June 1, 2008 You do realize that the Seal of Orichalcos already exists' date=' right?[/quote'] it doesn't exist. But it is an already created card, yes. One thing that you're missing though is pic credit. 1/10 for no originality.Nope. The card does exist, but it's illegal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alchemistjikan Posted June 2, 2008 Report Share Posted June 2, 2008 Epic Fail Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alchemistjikan Posted June 2, 2008 Report Share Posted June 2, 2008 Epic Fail Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted June 2, 2008 Report Share Posted June 2, 2008 The card does exist, it just hasn't been introduced to the TCG World. It most likely never will either as the effect is too overpowered so it would be illegal, even from the Traditional Format. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted June 2, 2008 Report Share Posted June 2, 2008 The card does exist, it just hasn't been introduced to the TCG World. It most likely never will either as the effect is too overpowered so it would be illegal, even from the Traditional Format. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
╬「Selatcia」╬ Posted June 2, 2008 Report Share Posted June 2, 2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
╬「Selatcia」╬ Posted June 2, 2008 Report Share Posted June 2, 2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffer Posted June 2, 2008 Report Share Posted June 2, 2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffer Posted June 2, 2008 Report Share Posted June 2, 2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted June 2, 2008 Report Share Posted June 2, 2008 "Yes, that includes the monsters treated as dark monsters by this card's first effect."You put that in the card's effect?! Wow, that failed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted June 2, 2008 Report Share Posted June 2, 2008 "Yes, that includes the monsters treated as dark monsters by this card's first effect."You put that in the card's effect?! Wow, that failed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Riglar Posted June 3, 2008 Author Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 i didnt put it on the actual card idiot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mutant Monster RAEG-HAPYP Posted June 3, 2008 Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 i didnt put it on the actual card idiot DON'T CALL HIM AN IDIOT!! You did put it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAG Posted June 3, 2008 Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 i didnt put it on the actual card idiotYes you did. -_-Third line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samer_13 Posted June 3, 2008 Report Share Posted June 3, 2008 Dartz would commit suicide seeing this card! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkDragonWorld Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 7.6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
╬「Selatcia」╬ Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 7.6/10 :?: :?: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careless Whisper Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 This thread was told to contain a valuable and good card. But all I see on the thread host post #1, is that epic fail. Everytime a member fails, YCMaker burns his cereal. Please don't make the cereal burned. We like it just alittle bit cooked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Asii Posted June 4, 2008 Report Share Posted June 4, 2008 He said that something wasn't on the card when it was. This leads me to believe that he didn't even make this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.