Shredder Posted July 20, 2007 Report Share Posted July 20, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAG Posted July 20, 2007 Report Share Posted July 20, 2007 exactly where are you going with this?¿?¿? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kibacorp Posted July 20, 2007 Report Share Posted July 20, 2007 yoooo im new on this site but i know unuf about yugioh to no that a monster can't have qustion marks with effet or anything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante Dimercurio Posted July 20, 2007 Report Share Posted July 20, 2007 okay i guess if its a god 8/10if not 5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
judedudemude Posted March 10, 2011 Report Share Posted March 10, 2011 lame copy of a god card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
n8thegr8 Posted March 10, 2011 Report Share Posted March 10, 2011 yoooo im new on this site but i know unuf about yugioh to no that a monster can't have qustion marks with effet or anything Yes it can Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ieyasu Tokugawa Posted March 10, 2011 Report Share Posted March 10, 2011 Yes it canI think he means it can't have ? ATK without an effect, which is true because you don't know what the card's attack is. Basically, bad card is bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted March 10, 2011 Report Share Posted March 10, 2011 omg its real gud No wait seriously, learn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MibeR Posted March 10, 2011 Report Share Posted March 10, 2011 you such a good card maker .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Six Samz 500 Posted March 10, 2011 Report Share Posted March 10, 2011 waste of time. just plain lazy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beefman Posted March 12, 2011 Report Share Posted March 12, 2011 10 posts and this guy hasn't received a SINGLE helpful comment. Tsk tsk.First off, I don't know what those <> are in the ATK and DEF are, but they don't belong there.Second, vanillas are boring.Third, there are many unneeded capitals in the (boring) lore. Just make it more creative, give it a little more thought, add an effect, and then we'll talk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anti-Apocryphal Posted March 12, 2011 Report Share Posted March 12, 2011 1) The ATK and DEF aren't real. They can be "?" instead.2) Add some more "pazazz" to this card. Nothing stands out.3) If you're going to make a non-effect-er card, make the story interesting, seriously.4) If this is going to be a God Card, it has to have an effect.5) This card isn't very good. [3.2/10] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beefman Posted March 12, 2011 Report Share Posted March 12, 2011 1) The ATK and DEF aren't real. They can be "?" instead.2) Add some more "pazazz" to this card. Nothing stands out.3) If you're going to make a non-effect-er card, make the story interesting, seriously.4) If this is going to be a God Card, it has to have an effect.5) This card isn't very good. [3.2/10] Finally, a helpful comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DARKPLANT RISING Posted March 12, 2011 Report Share Posted March 12, 2011 Second, vanillas are boring.Stop giving false information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoldOfWarriors Posted March 12, 2011 Report Share Posted March 12, 2011 I hate to be cruel... But if you don't know much about Yu-Gi-Oh! The Card Game and Yu-Gi-Oh Cards themselves you shouldn't be making your own Yu-Gi-Oh Cards... At least, under the "Realistic" Section. That Aside, if it's meant to be a God Card, look them up on google in order to follow the correct OCG for them. Try to make it unique, and if it has ? ATK points, it needs an effect that gives it ATK points, no exceptions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.