~ Chidori-Kun Posted June 23, 2008 Report Share Posted June 23, 2008 Why doesn't anyone run Darkworld anymore... Even though it's slower than a PC deck, it still kick ass. Can anyone who lives the meta tell my why Dark World Died...sob.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benraino Posted June 23, 2008 Report Share Posted June 23, 2008 Why doesn't anyone run Darkworld anymore... Even though it's slower than a PC deck' date=' it still kick ass. Can anyone who lives the meta tell my why Dark World Died...sob..[/quote'] Have you sen the Dark World deck I posted on this site? It died because of the more popular deck choices. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted June 23, 2008 Report Share Posted June 23, 2008 Good point, Dark World Zombie can take down DAD decks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pharaoh_Atem Posted June 23, 2008 Report Share Posted June 23, 2008 The first and third posts are downright humiliating. To the first post: Yes, it *CAN* kick ass. That does not mean that it *WILL* a majority of the time. Someone could run the worst deck ever, and still win against a good deck. Stop thinking that "it being able to perform" EVER MATTERS. To think such is immensely naive and shortsighted. The best decks don't win because they are "able to kick ass". They win because they consistently yield the best perormance of the period - they "kick ass all the time", whereas other decks do not. Really, this is all common sense stuff. You don't need to play the meta, or even play at all, to realize this. To the third post: I could run a junky, terrible "Law of the Normal" deck, and it would be possible to take down DAD decks. I could, realistically, run nearly anything, and said anything "could" take down DAD decks. It's utterly silly to think that "something being able to take down something else" means a damn thing. Come on, common sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weight Posted June 23, 2008 Report Share Posted June 23, 2008 To the dude above me...Atem or W.e - I had no clue what u said To the Starter of the Post - I Have a Darkworld deck. if Graceful Charity was not forbidden, the deck would be good. With an addition of a hole crap load of Discard to Activate... or morphing jar like effects. It would be hard to keep up with and with a Card of Safe Return it would keep up your hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benraino Posted June 23, 2008 Report Share Posted June 23, 2008 To the dude above me...Atem or W.e - I had no clue what u said To the Starter of the Post - I Have a Darkworld deck. if Graceful Charity was not forbidden' date=' the deck would be good. With an addition of a hole crap load of [b']Discard to Activate...[/b] or morphing jar like effects. It would be hard to keep up with and with a Card of Safe Return it would keep up your hand. Graceful Charity doesn't make Dark World good. Discarding cards for a card cost do not activate Dark World monsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purple Dinosaur Posted June 23, 2008 Report Share Posted June 23, 2008 Dark World is still good. There are just better things out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gutswarrior Posted June 23, 2008 Report Share Posted June 23, 2008 for me, dark world is good but for what i remember the highest attack is 2500 you need more dark world monsters and discarding effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fh-Fh Posted June 23, 2008 Report Share Posted June 23, 2008 Is dead. No more Dark World my friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orochi Posted June 23, 2008 Report Share Posted June 23, 2008 Dark World is still good. There are just better and faster things out there. fixed and Q4T Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted June 23, 2008 Report Share Posted June 23, 2008 Graceful Charity doesn't make Dark World good. Discarding cards for a card do not activate Dark World monsters. As long as it is a card effect (Such as in the matters of GC) it activates Dark World effects. This topic has been discussed before, and does not need another discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted June 23, 2008 Report Share Posted June 23, 2008 Dark World is still good. There are just better and faster things out there. Q4T Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted June 23, 2008 Report Share Posted June 23, 2008 To the dude above me...Atem or W.e - I had no clue what u said To the Starter of the Post - I Have a Darkworld deck. if Graceful Charity was not forbidden' date=' the deck would be good. With an addition of a hole crap load of [b']Discard to Activate...[/b] or morphing jar like effects. It would be hard to keep up with and with a Card of Safe Return it would keep up your hand.1. This person doesn't have common sense.2. Discard COSTS do not activate Dark World. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exiro Posted June 23, 2008 Report Share Posted June 23, 2008 To the dude above me...Atem or W.e - I had no clue what u said To the Starter of the Post - I Have a Darkworld deck. if Graceful Charity was not forbidden' date=' the deck would be good. With an addition of a hole crap load of [b']Discard to Activate...[/b] or morphing jar like effects. It would be hard to keep up with and with a Card of Safe Return it would keep up your hand.1. This person doesn't have common sense.2. Discard COSTS do not activate Dark World. Why did you bold 'morphing jar'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benraino Posted June 23, 2008 Report Share Posted June 23, 2008 Graceful Charity doesn't make Dark World good. Discarding cards for a card do not activate Dark World monsters. As long as it is a card effect (Such as in the matters of GC) it activates Dark World effects. This topic has been discussed before' date=' and does not need another discussion.[/quote'] Yeah, I know I forgot the word cost. On-Topic: Dark World isn't dead. There are just better and faster decks out there. However the deck I posted here was fast enough to win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted June 23, 2008 Report Share Posted June 23, 2008 i have a DW deck but i run it for the lulz. get JD for real duels/match's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadowferret Posted June 23, 2008 Report Share Posted June 23, 2008 Dark World... I think it died due to the whole..."OMG Morphing Jar!""OMG Macro Cosmos." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted June 23, 2008 Report Share Posted June 23, 2008 Dark World... I think it died due to the whole..."OMG Morphing Jar!""OMG Macro Cosmos." Relating one decks demise to a presence of another proves that you do not understand how metagame works Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadowferret Posted June 23, 2008 Report Share Posted June 23, 2008 No, I don't, actually. It's never even been explained to me what "metagame" is, actually.The only thing I really know for sure, about Dark World specifically is, that it most likely died because everyone was using the same remover deck.At least, it seems that way when I go to a tournament... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted June 23, 2008 Report Share Posted June 23, 2008 nope, meta is the good decks that work in the current banlist. Lightsworns are the win, Dark Worlds don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted June 23, 2008 Report Share Posted June 23, 2008 Macro is not widely used. For deck to be successful it must be good against 85% of decks. No matter what deck you build it will have one deck it is weak against. The thing that makes a deck competitive is how consistently it can win. In this format building a deck that does not work against glad beasts is silly because if you went to a major tournement you will find that about 50% of the top players will be running GB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luxlord Posted June 24, 2008 Report Share Posted June 24, 2008 I run a Dark World "Based" deckbecause most of the cards in my deck consist of dark world monsters and they indeed kick butt!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.