Amethyst Phoenix Posted June 29, 2008 Report Share Posted June 29, 2008 I love spectating things! *munches popcorn* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exyst Posted June 29, 2008 Report Share Posted June 29, 2008 I love spectating things! *munches popcorn* You have teh best ideas. *Takes out box of doughnuts* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Rose Phoenix® Posted June 29, 2008 Report Share Posted June 29, 2008 Mah, it's not to bad i gues, like the picture, i'd give it a 6/10, avarage!!^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonRoyale Posted June 29, 2008 Report Share Posted June 29, 2008 Ack, sorry, I went to bed shortly after leaving...so I hate to spoil the popcorn...NH had to PM me to get me back here...(BTW, this is probably the only post I'll make for a long while concerning this argument...again, sorry, out of my hands.) Wow, I completely let Crystal Beasts go right over my head. I forgot they count as Spells. I know Limiting this would be the best bet. It just seems to make sense. In threes, YES, this card is just stupid to have maindecked, because of all the fusion support out there. I think you and I can both agree that Limiting this card is the best bet. However, I just argue the point that with all the monster destruction, I fail to see how it not dying by battle makes it broken. You still take Battle Damage...(I say this because my Reaper and Marshmallon always die so fast in my burn deck, and they're the main line of defense when it comes to monsters.) Besides, you have to discard one card to destroy a card that's for the most part few and far between unless you're looking at dismantling the odd strategy that hardly shows up. Sorry if I don't feel like popping the popcorn, I just woke up, so I'm not only grumpy, but I am TIRED. :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.