Skyson Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 Image credit to DeviantArt. Comments appreciated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kingdom Xathers Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 Seems a bit overpowered, but kinda original. 7.3/10.0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bazzabaz Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 Original card but a bit overpowered.Maybe make it so that one of the cards you destroy MUST be one you control? Because it's a bit too strong.Perfect OCG and lurvly pic It's the sex XD ---> 7.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
╬「Selatcia」╬ Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 What they said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FiRaven Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 Pyrokinetic MagicianOCG - 4/5 Originality/Effect - 50/65 It is a bit over powered, but good effectPicture/Name - 20/25 the picture looks like it is a bit off.My Personal Liking - 4/5 It is pretty good but doesn't pop off the pageTotal---------------------------------------> 78/100 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sionnach Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 A very interesting card, splashable in just about everything. It's like Celestia and Kuraz had a kid, lololo. Putting this card back into your Deck is a -1 until its drawn, where it then pays for itself with the Special Summon and destruction effect. I don't believe it's too overpowered because the opponent will know two turns in advance when it its effect will go off and just prepare from there; however, I'm certain this card would be limited or restricted. Since it only gets its effect through itself, it's otherwise a 7 star 2400 ATKer, which is below average for its stats, and offsets its powerful destruction effect. 9/10. Teh fire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.