●The True Riku● Posted December 1, 2008 Report Share Posted December 1, 2008 it's been a long time though' date=' it might have been disproven now, I'll have to check it again[/quote'] We were reading about venus about a week ago in my world geography class so i think i will check. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted December 1, 2008 Report Share Posted December 1, 2008 Mars certainly it can't evaporate like that. It's been proven there's water there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
●The True Riku● Posted December 1, 2008 Report Share Posted December 1, 2008 Mars certainly it can't evaporate like that. It's been proven there's water there Good point:| but if they sent the water to mercury then that would be a differrent story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted December 1, 2008 Report Share Posted December 1, 2008 yeah that is TOO close to the sun, not sure if any water has been found there yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
●The True Riku● Posted December 1, 2008 Report Share Posted December 1, 2008 yeah that is TOO close to the sun' date=' not sure if any water has been found there yet[/quote'] I just have a theory....what if mecury was a piece of the sun and it was pushed out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted December 1, 2008 Report Share Posted December 1, 2008 all that proves is that the sun will eventually burn out, which we all know anyway. The sun is just a star, and stars burn out over time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
●The True Riku● Posted December 1, 2008 Report Share Posted December 1, 2008 all that proves is that the sun will eventually burn out' date=' which we all know anyway. The sun is just a star, and stars burn out over time[/quote'] It will burn out in about meh....5 million years or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted December 1, 2008 Report Share Posted December 1, 2008 yeah I know that. If mercury really WAS a part of the sun, it may hint a supernova event Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
●The True Riku● Posted December 1, 2008 Report Share Posted December 1, 2008 yeah I know that. If mercury really WAS a part of the sun' date=' it may hint a supernova event[/quote'] That little theory has been buging me for a few years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted December 1, 2008 Report Share Posted December 1, 2008 well the sun has been around this long, why should we believe its supernova is right around the corner? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
●The True Riku● Posted December 1, 2008 Report Share Posted December 1, 2008 well the sun has been around this long' date=' why should we believe its supernova is right around the corner?[/quote'] That is true......but if a supernova was about to occur wouldnt the day get brighter? and if thats the case BOOM!! Goodby earth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted December 1, 2008 Report Share Posted December 1, 2008 exactly what I'm getting at, unless of course when the sun exploded the fragments simply burned out quickly, but if that's true it'd be nightfall right away for the parts of the Earth that's still in the day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
●The True Riku● Posted December 1, 2008 Report Share Posted December 1, 2008 exactly what I'm getting at' date=' unless of course when the sun exploded the fragments simply burned out quickly, but if that's true it'd be nightfall right away for the parts of the Earth that's still in the day[/quote'] Yeah thats true,but the earth would still die since there is no solar energy to use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted December 1, 2008 Report Share Posted December 1, 2008 And that's the process of creating our own solar energy, although right now we're only prepared for a much less apocalyptic event Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
●The True Riku● Posted December 1, 2008 Report Share Posted December 1, 2008 And that's the process of creating our own solar energy' date=' although right now we're only prepared for a much less apocalyptic event[/quote'] That is so unprepared! what if a meteor is headed for earth and the military has no way to stop it since they didnt prepare for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted December 1, 2008 Report Share Posted December 1, 2008 I'm unsure of meteors, but asteroids we're already prepared for. Comets we're certainly not because we'd only get a few years warning For asteroids, we can use nuclear weapons (and don't bother thinking Armageddon movie in 1998, that doesn't work in real life), or turn the sun's energy against it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
●The True Riku● Posted December 1, 2008 Report Share Posted December 1, 2008 I'm unsure of meteors' date=' but asteroids we're already prepared for. Comets we're certainly not because we'd only get a few years warning For asteroids, we can use nuclear weapons (and don't bother thinking Armageddon movie in 1998, that doesn't work in real life), or turn the sun's energy against it[/quote'] If we tried that thing from the movie we could kiss earth goodbye! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted December 1, 2008 Report Share Posted December 1, 2008 If we actually hit it with a nuclear weapon, all this will accomplish is break the asteroid into smaller chunks, each several miles in length and width. And then instead of one big explosion on the surface we'd have the ultimate cluster bomb hit us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
●The True Riku● Posted December 1, 2008 Report Share Posted December 1, 2008 If we actually hit it with a nuclear weapon' date=' all this will accomplish is break the asteroid into smaller chunks, each several miles in length and width. And then instead of one big explosion on the surface we'd have the ultimate cluster bomb hit us[/quote'] That would be worse than just letting it hit us! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted December 1, 2008 Report Share Posted December 1, 2008 that's why the tactic is detonate nuclear weapons close to the asteroid, force it to bounce into a different orbit and miss the Earth. And this theory was accepted by everyone..............until someone pointed out the one assumption this theory was based on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
●The True Riku● Posted December 2, 2008 Report Share Posted December 2, 2008 that's why the tactic is detonate nuclear weapons close to the asteroid' date=' force it to bounce into a different orbit and miss the Earth. And this theory was accepted by everyone..............until someone pointed out the one assumption this theory was based on[/quote'] They have to be very careful to hit the target. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted December 2, 2008 Report Share Posted December 2, 2008 actually no. It was based on the theory that the asteroid is solid and therefore spinning fast. This tactic will not work on a slow spinning asteroid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
●The True Riku● Posted December 2, 2008 Report Share Posted December 2, 2008 actually no. It was based on the theory that the asteroid is solid and therefore spinning fast. This tactic will not work on a slow spinning asteroidThat is true.....the speed of the asteroid would cuase it to become so hot that it is possible to hit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted December 2, 2008 Report Share Posted December 2, 2008 actually that's not the case. See, if the asteroid is spinning so slowly, that means much of it is empty porus space (because if it spun any faster the asteroid will simply splinter apart) You DO know what will happen if you fire a nuclear weapon into such an asteroid, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
●The True Riku● Posted December 2, 2008 Report Share Posted December 2, 2008 actually that's not the case. See' date=' if the asteroid is spinning so slowly, that means much of it is empty porus space (because if it spun any faster the asteroid will simply splinter apart) You DO know what will happen if you fire a nuclear weapon into such an asteroid, right?[/quote'] *Big whistle* Yup! I SURE DO!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.