luffy789 Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 This deck is all dragon monsters. Monsters x15x3Blue-Eyes White DragonKumori Dragonx2Spear DragonKaiser Sea Horsex1Winged Dragon Guardian of The FortressRyu-RanRed Eyes Black DragonBaby DragonTime Wizard Fusion x2Blue Eyes Ultimate DragonThousand Dragon Spell Cards x14x3Dragon TreasurePolymerizationx2Brain Controlx1Mystical Space Typhoon Monster RebornSwords of Revealing LightPremature BurialHammer ShotReasoning Trap Cards x12x3Trap HoleBlast With Chainx2Reckless Greedx1Torrential TributeOrdeal of a TravelerRobbin GoblinMirror Force I use this deck for fun. I would like rates, fixes, adds, and deletes. No saying This deck sucks. my record with deck so far is 21 and 6. i have a 5 game win streak. Thanx. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
armageddon08 Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 The first thing you want to do is buy 2 copies of the Rise of the Dragon Lords deck. Then you want to take out all the non Dragon monsters(except Morphing Jar) and try to build a deck around those. All I see here is a random pile of crap with staples thrown in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luffy789 Posted July 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 ok but look at my record though. where can i get Rise of the Dragon Lords Decks from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 Record means nothing when we dont know who you play and how good a player they are. And dont just say they are good players because your deck is saying otherwise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skuldur Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 Okay why is Fusionist in your deck TAKE IT OUT NOW And change this into a blue eyes deck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luffy789 Posted July 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 Record means nothing when we dont know who you play and how good a player they are. And dont just say they are good players because your deck is saying otherwise ok i'll tell you the decks i've won against. warrior, fiend, beatdown, zombie, 1 monarch, 1 yata, and 4 times against chaos. skulder: i already have a blue eyes deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tekken Ham Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 Lol@Nothing meta. Lol@Obvious liar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XanderTheGreat Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 *barfs* Another insult to dragon decks. Why am I not surprised? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luffy789 Posted July 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 Lol@Nothing meta. Lol@Obvious liar. don't know anyone who has meta. would like to play one though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 Record means nothing when we dont know who you play and how good a player they are. And dont just say they are good players because your deck is saying otherwise ok i'll tell you the decks i've won against. warrior' date=' fiend, beatdown, zombie, 1 monarch, 1 yata, and 4 times against chaos. skulder: i already have a blue eyes deck.[/quote'] This means nothing we do not know how well built those decks are and how good the players are, stop trying to claim you are a good player when your decks say otherwise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
armageddon08 Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 I absolutely agree with JoC. Don't post something unless you can prove it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luffy789 Posted July 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 Record means nothing when we dont know who you play and how good a player they are. And dont just say they are good players because your deck is saying otherwise ok i'll tell you the decks i've won against. warrior' date=' fiend, beatdown, zombie, 1 monarch, 1 yata, and 4 times against chaos. skulder: i already have a blue eyes deck.[/quote'] This means nothing we do not know how well built those decks are and how good the players are, stop trying to claim you are a good player when your decks say otherwise well actually, while you make a good point, i have a point of my own. sure my decks may look weak or crappy to you, but i know how to use it. a true duelist can use any deck and win. it doesn't matter if you think it's good or not. i'm asking for help with this deck, so if you don't want to help, don't say anything. i'm asking for help so i can make my deck a better one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 Record means nothing when we dont know who you play and how good a player they are. And dont just say they are good players because your deck is saying otherwise ok i'll tell you the decks i've won against. warrior' date=' fiend, beatdown, zombie, 1 monarch, 1 yata, and 4 times against chaos. skulder: i already have a blue eyes deck.[/quote'] This means nothing we do not know how well built those decks are and how good the players are, stop trying to claim you are a good player when your decks say otherwise well actually, while you make a good point, i have a point of my own. sure my decks may look weak or crappy to you, but i know how to use it. a true duelist can use any deck and win. it doesn't matter if you think it's good or not. i'm asking for help with this deck, so if you don't want to help, don't say anything. i'm asking for help so i can make my deck a better one. Incorrect, how come you see no decks such as yours at the nationals or high level tournements? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luffy789 Posted July 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 Record means nothing when we dont know who you play and how good a player they are. And dont just say they are good players because your deck is saying otherwise ok i'll tell you the decks i've won against. warrior' date=' fiend, beatdown, zombie, 1 monarch, 1 yata, and 4 times against chaos. skulder: i already have a blue eyes deck.[/quote'] This means nothing we do not know how well built those decks are and how good the players are, stop trying to claim you are a good player when your decks say otherwise well actually, while you make a good point, i have a point of my own. sure my decks may look weak or crappy to you, but i know how to use it. a true duelist can use any deck and win. it doesn't matter if you think it's good or not. i'm asking for help with this deck, so if you don't want to help, don't say anything. i'm asking for help so i can make my deck a better one. Incorrect, how come you see no decks such as yours at the nationals or high level tournements? maybe people don't prepare good for tournaments. and besides they probably wouldn't know what to do with this type of deck. could you play with this deck? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 Record means nothing when we dont know who you play and how good a player they are. And dont just say they are good players because your deck is saying otherwise ok i'll tell you the decks i've won against. warrior' date=' fiend, beatdown, zombie, 1 monarch, 1 yata, and 4 times against chaos. skulder: i already have a blue eyes deck.[/quote'] This means nothing we do not know how well built those decks are and how good the players are, stop trying to claim you are a good player when your decks say otherwise well actually, while you make a good point, i have a point of my own. sure my decks may look weak or crappy to you, but i know how to use it. a true duelist can use any deck and win. it doesn't matter if you think it's good or not. i'm asking for help with this deck, so if you don't want to help, don't say anything. i'm asking for help so i can make my deck a better one. Incorrect, how come you see no decks such as yours at the nationals or high level tournements? maybe people don't prepare good for tournaments. and besides they probably wouldn't know what to do with this type of deck. could you play with this deck? You really are clueless arent you. www.metagame.com go here, read some articles come back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tefached Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 this deck is over the size limit...by alot this deck is horribly madedoesnt follow the correct posting form Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luffy789 Posted July 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 Diety Axle: ummm it's under 50 cards. don't know what you are talking about. it's fine. the form is fine. JoC: looked at 2 articles. doesn't prove anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snake101 Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 build a deck around king dragun Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XanderTheGreat Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 build a deck around king dragun Bad advice is bad. Without REDRUM, dragon decks are unviable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 Why did JoC not close this topic for breaking, like, three rules? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skuldur Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 A true duelist can use any deck and win. I think someone has been watching way to much Yugioh as for the deck -all monsters except Blue Eyes-Dragon treasure and offering to the doomed-all your traps except Torrential and Mirror Force +anything else Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luffy789 Posted July 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 finally someone with advice thanx. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tekken Ham Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 Why did JoC not close this topic for breaking' date=' like, three rules?[/quote'] Because it's too lulzy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XanderTheGreat Posted July 10, 2008 Report Share Posted July 10, 2008 Why did JoC not close this topic for breaking' date=' like, three rules?[/quote'] Because it's too lulzy. Seconded. This topic gave me my daily need of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tekken Ham Posted July 10, 2008 Report Share Posted July 10, 2008 I just got my fix off of Gaia. Some kid said he won an SJC with pure dragons. So we went to Jason Grabher-Meyer. And it turns out, the kid lied. Lulz for everyone! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.