Jump to content

Teenage Dating

Wyhe

By Wyhe
in General

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Brushfire Newbie

Brushfire

Posted
Posted

If not during this ages' date=' then when? :\

Of course they must.

[/quote']

 

When they are in a more mature state of being.

Sexual Intercourse has increased .

I'm talking about dating.

IIRC, dating does not necessary mean having sex.

 

Bolded: In most cases, anyway.

 

Well, it might just be my funked up area, but most girls in my school have lost their virginity at 12-13. And actually, no, most of them aren't slags either. Normally, teenage dating is supposed to be used to build social skills with girls, and perhaps go as far as making out. But, where I live, it doesn't quite work like that. In England, it was apparently proved that Year 9 was the most sexually active year. In most ways, I find that fairly sick, as most people shouldn't be going that far at that age, PERIOD. But I'm affraid that there's not much we can do about it, and we're going to have to deal with it.

 

-Faint has spoken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Silencerleader Newbie

Silencerleader

Posted
Posted

Basically' date=' this:

 

Sub-18's dating: Perfectly fine, although I might be a bit biased on the matter.

 

Sub-18's having sex: No. Simply no. If anything, protected. The last thing we need is pregnant thirteen-year olds.

[/quote']

 

Say that to the girls down in Miami...*sigh*

And the guys without protection...*long sigh*

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jerry OldMaster Newbie

Jerry OldMaster

Posted
Posted

If not during this ages' date=' then when? :\

Of course they must.

[/quote']

 

When they are in a more mature state of being.

Sexual Intercourse has increased .

I'm talking about dating.

IIRC, dating does not necessary mean having sex.

 

Bolded: In most cases, anyway.

 

Then it's somewhat less drastic here in Holland.

Yeah, it's less drastic in the land of whores, you heard it right xD

At school, in my class only two people of the 29 had had experience with girlfriends/boyfriends. I think we're sliiiightly late in that point of view :mrgreen:

Either that or Dutch girls are really choosy. *sigh*....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tkill93 Newbie

Tkill93

Posted
Posted

Discuss-Should Teenagers be Allowed to Date?

 

Personally speaking' date=' I believe that they have the right to do so, but not completely ready for it.

 

Note: I meant to put it in Debates, but I can't do so. If a Mod considers it to be in Debates, please place it there.

[/quote']

 

Threads made in the debate section need approval before being able to be viewed publicly. Have some patience and a mod will approve your thread when they get to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wyhe Newbie

Wyhe

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Discuss-Should Teenagers be Allowed to Date?

 

Personally speaking' date=' I believe that they have the right to do so, but not completely ready for it.

 

Note: I meant to put it in Debates, but I can't do so. If a Mod considers it to be in Debates, please place it there.

[/quote']

 

Threads made in the debate section need approval before being able to be viewed publicly. Have some patience and a mod will approve your thread when they get to it.

thanks for the info.

I will be waiting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
2sick4u Newbie

2sick4u

Posted
Posted

Bah.

This is getting ridiculous.

There's more of a chance pregnancy won't happen than that it will.

It takes accurate timing.

Just because "A condom's faulty/expired"

Doesn't mean "Zomg if he does it, she's getting pregnant."

Chill out.

Some couples try for months to become pregnant, because it's more difficult than not.

You're just corrupt by Hollywood.

Plain and simply, you use the movies of "Pregnancy in teens being romantic" as your source for knowledge.

Expand, and google. ^_^.

You know, statistically speaking, in certain cases, it's more common for an S.T.I to occur over pregnancy.

=/.

Sheesh.

Underage sex isn't aloud, end of story.

There are no restrictions aloud on dating, I mean, read Guinness, you'd see six year olds getting married. (Parents arranged it.)

I think the questions answered.. By about 40-or so different people..

O.o".

2sick~

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bakura Vessal Newbie

Bakura Vessal

Posted
Posted

Bah.

This is getting ridiculous.

There's more of a chance pregnancy won't happen than that it will.

It takes accurate timing.

Just because "A condom's faulty/expired"

Doesn't mean "Zomg if he does it' date=' she's getting pregnant."

Chill out.

Some couples try for months to become pregnant, because it's more difficult than not.

You're just corrupt by Hollywood.

Plain and simply, you use the movies of "Pregnancy in teens being romantic" as your source for knowledge.

Expand, and google. ^_^.

You know, statistically speaking, in certain cases, it's more common for an S.T.I to occur over pregnancy.

=/.

Sheesh.

Underage sex isn't aloud, end of story.

There are no restrictions aloud on dating, I mean, read Guinness, you'd see six year olds getting married. (Parents arranged it.)

I think the questions answered.. By about 40-or so different people..

O.o".

2sick~

[/size']

 

yeh its not like i will be having sex with every woman i date

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Static Newbie

Static

Posted
Posted

Child Birth and Sexual Intercourse should be separated entirely.

 

With that key idea in place, they should be allowed to date and fooled by the false image of Teenage "Love." It does the kids a good lesson to learn that they are not as true as they think they are at that age.

 

Even without it, why not let them? Only crazy people are against abortion, and crazy people shouldn't spread crazy genetic information onto the next generation anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Static Newbie

Static

Posted
Posted

i think teens should be allowed to date but preteens (like me) should not. But teens should not conduct sexuall activities

 

Why not?

 

not much difference between 18 and 17.

 

And I am going to assume that by teen, you mean 14-15. 13 does not count, it is closer to 12 than to 14.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
2sick4u Newbie

2sick4u

Posted
Posted

1.Child Birth and Sexual Intercourse should be separated entirely.

 

2.With that key idea in place' date=' they should be allowed to date and fooled by the false image of Teenage "Love." It does the kids a good lesson to learn that they are not as true as they think they are at that age.

 

3.Even without it, why not let them? Only crazy people are against abortion, and crazy people shouldn't spread crazy genetic information onto the next generation anyway.

[/quote']

Taking one of your idea's, paragraphs are numbered. =].

 

1. Agreed, as it was what I was trying to say.

 

2. Teenage love at the most is just exploring the idea of "Love." Why make them learn the lesson? Keeping them from it seems to save the trouble relationships could bring. I mean, teenage kids, desperate for love or the "cure for loneliness", tend to get way over emotional. It's best to skip putting them in that crappy position by just making it seem.. Unconventional for teenagers to date at that age. (Well, to clarify, I'm pretty much referring to people from the ages of 10-15.)

 

3. Well, you're saying that abortion should be generically allowed, and utilized in such a way. Generically, that is. Problem being.. Doing so would lead to unprotected sex in the truckload, shut down a probably important part of the latex industry, and cause a generic out-burst of S.T.I's. (Sexually Transmitted Infections.) Probably not as good as just having the kid, in my view.

=/.

2sick~

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Static Newbie

Static

Posted
Posted

1.Child Birth and Sexual Intercourse should be separated entirely.

 

2.With that key idea in place' date=' they should be allowed to date and fooled by the false image of Teenage "Love." It does the kids a good lesson to learn that they are not as true as they think they are at that age.

 

3.Even without it, why not let them? Only crazy people are against abortion, and crazy people shouldn't spread crazy genetic information onto the next generation anyway.

[/quote']

Taking one of your idea's, paragraphs are numbered. =].

 

1. Agreed, as it was what I was trying to say.

 

2. Teenage love at the most is just exploring the idea of "Love." Why make them learn the lesson? Keeping them from it seems to save the trouble relationships could bring. I mean, teenage kids, desperate for love or the "cure for loneliness", tend to get way over emotional. It's best to skip putting them in that crappy position by just making it seem.. Unconventional for teenagers to date at that age. (Well, to clarify, I'm pretty much referring to people from the ages of 10-15.)

 

3. Well, you're saying that abortion should be generically allowed, and utilized in such a way. Generically, that is. Problem being.. Doing so would lead to unprotected sex in the truckload, shut down a probably important part of the latex industry, and cause a generic out-burst of S.T.I's. (Sexually Transmitted Infections.) Probably not as good as just having the kid, in my view.

=/.

2sick~

 

2. Because they are better off knowing and suffering. That bit of knowledge is worth the pain, because if you can't get over something as insignificant as your [teenage] emotions, then you really aren't prepared for the real world.

 

3. Ideally, when #1 comes into place, we would have a government that gives us cures rather than treatments. STI's (STD's) would be curable, and essentially eliminated until a new one arises, which would then be eliminated swiftly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
2sick4u Newbie

2sick4u

Posted
Posted

1.Child Birth and Sexual Intercourse should be separated entirely.

 

2.With that key idea in place' date=' they should be allowed to date and fooled by the false image of Teenage "Love." It does the kids a good lesson to learn that they are not as true as they think they are at that age.

 

3.Even without it, why not let them? Only crazy people are against abortion, and crazy people shouldn't spread crazy genetic information onto the next generation anyway.

[/quote']

Taking one of your idea's, paragraphs are numbered. =].

 

1. Agreed, as it was what I was trying to say.

 

2. Teenage love at the most is just exploring the idea of "Love." Why make them learn the lesson? Keeping them from it seems to save the trouble relationships could bring. I mean, teenage kids, desperate for love or the "cure for loneliness", tend to get way over emotional. It's best to skip putting them in that crappy position by just making it seem.. Unconventional for teenagers to date at that age. (Well, to clarify, I'm pretty much referring to people from the ages of 10-15.)

 

3. Well, you're saying that abortion should be generically allowed, and utilized in such a way. Generically, that is. Problem being.. Doing so would lead to unprotected sex in the truckload, shut down a probably important part of the latex industry, and cause a generic out-burst of S.T.I's. (Sexually Transmitted Infections.) Probably not as good as just having the kid, in my view.

=/.

2sick~

 

2. Because they are better off knowing and suffering. That bit of knowledge is worth the pain, because if you can't get over something as insignificant as your [teenage] emotions, then you really aren't prepared for the real world.

 

3. Ideally, when #1 comes into place, we would have a government that gives us cures rather than treatments. STI's (STD's) would be curable, and essentially eliminated until a new one arises, which would then be eliminated swiftly.

Hm.

Okay..

2. The knowledge being worth the pain.. Well, that's a pretty neutral statement, so I don't see a problem with it. =/. But, you're saying the knowledge about love justifies for the hurt of love? As in one must know the worst it can bring, to truly understand it? O.o". Still, I'd rather just be in control of myself at an older age, and be an absolute douche at love. Lawl. All teens don't know a thing about the real world, so I don't see how that last sentence can be an issue. It's like, douching a douche. It's already clean.. So.. What's the point? Teen years, in my eyes, have never been a time of learning. =/.

 

3. Just to clarify, the name became S.T.I's, since it's contagious. =].

S.T.I's aren't close to curable, only preventable. Breakthroughs may be close, but at this time, if abortion would become that generalized, the amount of S.T.I carriers would excel any demand the scientists manufacturing cures could cope with. It's best to leave it prevented until a time of more certainty, which I think is what you were hinting to anyway. =/.

So.. I think we're kind of on the same page.. For the most part.

2sick~

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...