Thinking of a random number might be a little harder after reading this...

[2sick4u]

actually' date=' i dont really think so, im not trying to prove you wrong, but there isn't a 3 included in the number O.o

[/quote']

 

3 is a factor of 7 in terms of addition, genius.

 

And that proves this topic is bull.

-_-". Even you're being a douche.

The number was 742, and yet, clairex ignored the obvious relation just to try and be 1337 funny.

Pulling out random numbers to make a mockery of this topic is bull.

I'll say it again,

4x2= 8, which is chronologically ahead of 7.

The number relates, although barely, with it's other digits.

Oh, and "clariex." Wow. Sorry I spelt the Non-English name wrong. Forgive me for not paying more attention to you next time, okay?.

[Whitey]

You know, this could be like some kind of game in the games section, someone posts a number then someone finds out the similarities and posts another number lol

[Larxene]

I don't think I ever, at any point, said 2x4

Therefore, your comments are, once again, pointless

[2sick4u]

I don't think I ever' date=' at any point, said 2x4

Therefore, your comments are, once again, pointless

[/color']

What the hell are you even talking about?

I'll explain what I did step by step.

 

1. I read Fh-Fh's post.

2. I noticed the number was 742

3. I then read the post created by clariex, who was acting like a douche.

4. I noticed the formula used by you was just random numbers thrown together to diss the topic.

5. I called you a douche.

6. I provided the correct formula, using the numbers 4 and 2, which are part of the number 742, not because I thought you used them, to make 8, which is chronologically ahead of seven.

7. I replied to this.

 

You see, I actually answered Fh-Fh's question whilst being on-topic.

You just saw it as a time to be a douche.

My post had a point, a correct one.

Yours didn't.

Try thinking next time.

-_-.

[Tkill93]

"A douche is a device used to introduce a stream of water into the body for medical or hygienic reasons, or the stream of water itself"

kthx

 

 

Now, everyone get along, hold hands, and stop the fighting. I would hate to lock this

[「tea.leaf」]

There is no correct formula.

 

Stop insulting other members, this is a warning.

[Whitey]

I just want to stick to the topic and do this number thingy...now can anyone figure this out?

 

4386

[2sick4u]

There is no correct formula.

 

Stop insulting other members' date=' this is a warning.

[/quote']

Douche isn't really an insult.. But okay, I'll heed the warning. =/.

Just to clarify, I was a jerk to her because of the jerk she was to the thread. Karma baby. =/..

 

Anyway..

I was saying Clariex's formula, not one of a universal nature.

__x/+/whatever ____ = _____ Is a formula, which is what I was referring to.

 

Wow.. Even Tkill took a stab at my lingo. Somehow, I think my debating is just digging myself a hole. =/.

Ah well.

Tkill, I know the meaning for a douche, however, English as a language is twisted as it is, so having my own meaning for douche isn't to much of a crime.

My meaning of douche: (n) A person and/or object to which commits the act of "Douching".

My meaning of douching: (v) The act in which a person purposefully disregards an opinion/ideal illogically.

Simple enough.

=].

And for Lord Whitey.. ^_^.

Break it up.

4386.

43 is half of 86.

Abit of a basic relation.

;].

[Whitey]

then how about this?

 

3865

[2sick4u]

then how about this?

 

3865

... Would it kill you to do a three digit one? ~_~.

Hm.

3+8=11-6=5.

Simple again.

=].

[Whitey]

if you want a 3 digit one, then this one will kill you!

 

3958572

 

and besides, i can figure out the 3 digit ones, so easy....

[2sick4u]

if you want a 3 digit one' date=' then this one will kill you!

 

3958572

 

and besides, i can figure out the 3 digit ones, so easy....

[/quote']

... ~_~.

Okay.

That's a little above someone who goes on a Yu-Gi-Oh forums level.

But, none the less.

I can get the digits to relate.. Just abit randomly.

I mean, each digit can be used once to relate to another in a math equation..

Yeah..

3(Squared)=9+5=14/7=2+5=.. Aw crap.

Yeah.. I think I'll let Willie do that one..

Seeing as I failz to getz to 8.

=[.

EDIT: Got it. 3+9+5+8=25/5=5+2=7.

At least, in that sum, All the numbers related into equaling each other.

Otherwise..

I have no idea.

O.o".

[Pimpalo]

The number I thought of was 69...

 

Can you relate that to the theory somehow?

 

'cause I'm stumped =/

[Tefached]

try this number for your weird random theory thing

 

93,842,572,795,621,057,135,486,941,075

 

how is any of that releated besides the fact they're all numbers.

huh

[Chaos Impact™]

Wow thats wierd

[2sick4u]

try this number for your weird random theory thing

 

93' date='842,572,795,621,057,135,486,941,075

 

how is any of that releated besides the fact they're all numbers.

huh

[/quote']

*Sigh.*

Essentially, you've just got a whole lot of 3 digit numbers that relate.

If you want the whole number to relate, well, get a supercomputer. =|.

93= 9/3=3. They relate factorially.

842= 4x2=8. Again, the first number is the sum of the last two.

572= 7-2=5. Mmmhm.

795= 9+5=14, a multiple of seven.

621= 1+2=3, a factor of six.

057= Well, I said myself that two digit numbers don't really work. ~_~.

135= 1+3=4. Then 5-4=1. Then 1+3=4. The digits form a paradox.

486= 4+8=12. A multiple of six, and the next in the 4 multiple chain.

941= Meh. Maybe this one doesn't work. Best I could do: 1+4=5, then 9-5=4. Mild paradox. =|.

075= Well, essentially that's the same as 057. Again, not doable.

 

Most people here expected something epic of a theory, however, still think to much of it.

It just states that all the digits in any random number relate in some way.

This is just saying that any amount of continents and prime numbers can relate to each other in any cluster of them. If that makes sense. =/.

Just remember.

It's as long as they relate in any way, no matter how insignificant.

Be it, chronological order, factors, multiples, or they just add into each other. (257, for example.)

Lower your expectations guyz. O.o".

[Tefached]

try this number for your weird random theory thing

 

93' date='842,572,795,621,057,135,486,941,075

 

how is any of that releated besides the fact they're all numbers.

huh

[/quote']

*Sigh.*

Essentially, you've just got a whole lot of 3 digit numbers that relate.

If you want the whole number to relate, well, get a supercomputer. =|.

93= 9/3=3. They relate factorially.

842= 4x2=8. Again, the first number is the sum of the last two.

572= 7-2=5. Mmmhm.

795= 9+5=14, a multiple of seven.

621= 1+2=3, a factor of six.

057= Well, I said myself that two digit numbers don't really work. ~_~.

135= 1+3=4. Then 5-4=1. Then 1+3=4. The digits form a paradox.

486= 4+8=12. A multiple of six, and the next in the 4 multiple chain.

941= Meh. Maybe this one doesn't work. Best I could do: 1+4=5, then 9-5=4. Mild paradox. =|.

075= Well, essentially that's the same as 057. Again, not doable.

 

Most people here expected something epic of a theory, however, still think to much of it.

It just states that all the digits in any random number relate in some way.

This is just saying that any amount of continents and prime numbers can relate to each other in any cluster of them. If that makes sense. =/.

Just remember.

It's as long as they relate in any way, no matter how insignificant.

Be it, chronological order, factors, multiples, or they just add into each other. (257, for example.)

Lower your expectations guyz. O.o".

 

well if two digit numbers dont really work here then that proves that not all numbers relate

though all numbers relate due to the fact that they are all numbers.

as for rearranging the numbers such as 572 does that count if you rearrange them?

third and foremost, all numbers dont relate its just through random math you can make it seem like they do.

[2sick4u]

try this number for your weird random theory thing

 

93' date='842,572,795,621,057,135,486,941,075

 

how is any of that releated besides the fact they're all numbers.

huh

[/quote']

*Sigh.*

Essentially, you've just got a whole lot of 3 digit numbers that relate.

If you want the whole number to relate, well, get a supercomputer. =|.

93= 9/3=3. They relate factorially.

842= 4x2=8. Again, the first number is the sum of the last two.

572= 7-2=5. Mmmhm.

795= 9+5=14, a multiple of seven.

621= 1+2=3, a factor of six.

057= Well, I said myself that two digit numbers don't really work. ~_~.

135= 1+3=4. Then 5-4=1. Then 1+3=4. The digits form a paradox.

486= 4+8=12. A multiple of six, and the next in the 4 multiple chain.

941= Meh. Maybe this one doesn't work. Best I could do: 1+4=5, then 9-5=4. Mild paradox. =|.

075= Well, essentially that's the same as 057. Again, not doable.

 

Most people here expected something epic of a theory, however, still think to much of it.

It just states that all the digits in any random number relate in some way.

This is just saying that any amount of continents and prime numbers can relate to each other in any cluster of them. If that makes sense. =/.

Just remember.

It's as long as they relate in any way, no matter how insignificant.

Be it, chronological order, factors, multiples, or they just add into each other. (257, for example.)

Lower your expectations guyz. O.o".

 

well if two digit numbers dont really work here then that proves that not all numbers relate

though all numbers relate due to the fact that they are all numbers.

as for rearranging the numbers such as 572 does that count if you rearrange them?

third and foremost, all numbers dont relate its just through random math you can make it seem like they do.

I never agreed to the fact that two digit numbers relate, but I did agree to the 3 upwards ones.

Rearranging doesn't matter in the slightest.

You're just proving the numbers relation.

So for 572, obviously, you'd rearrange it to be 5+2=7, or 7-2=5 and so on.

And yes, personally, I believe they all would relate in some way.

With a fair 80% of numbers I can prove this, with basic arithmetic.

However, even more complex arithmetic can prove the latter 20%.

My understanding of math doesn't/shouldn't defect the theory.

How can you make something seem related in math?

It's not a maybe type of thing.

Simply, you're stating the theory.

Digits in a random number can relate through random math.

Our mind selects digits commonly encountered in sums, and thus, uses numbers like "628" and the like.

The thread's obviously distanced from the original idea, seeing as people weren't thinking up random numbers, but throwing in joke ones they thought couldn't relate.

Knowledge of what you're doing takes out the random factor.

O.o".

I hope all that makes sense..

=].

[「tea.leaf」]

f(x)=y is not a valid equation in any case because you do no DEFINE a function. Just point out that there is a relationship means nothing when you do not specify what that relationship IS.

[Lazer Yoshi]

Thats very weird! I thought of 214. I have no idea what it relates to though :P

[Pimpalo]

srsly?

 

Double 'em

 

1 2 4

[bozotehpwns]

ook so obviosly people are just trying to com eup with really big numbers to disprove willies theory...basically what hes saying is if someone said "pick a number between 100 and 500" then whatever number you picked wouldn't exactly be random...because your brain groups things together...its no that EVERY set of numbers can be grouped its that YOUR brain has grouped them...so lets say you just got done playing battlefield 2142 and the above quote is asked of you. You might just say 2142 because it was the last thing you just played O.o

[3cchiFr3ak]

I think this is bull. (Not to be offensive or anything.)

 

You can rip apart ANY multi-digit number in existence and probably find some sort of pattern amongst its digits.

This isn't bull, it's a theory! Though, I do agree with your last sentence.

[2sick4u]

ook so obviosly people are just trying to com eup with really big numbers to disprove willies theory...basically what hes saying is if someone said "pick a number between 100 and 500" then whatever number you picked wouldn't exactly be random...because your brain groups things together...its no that EVERY set of numbers can be grouped its that YOUR brain has grouped them...so lets say you just got done playing battlefield 2142 and the above quote is asked of you. You might just say 2142 because it was the last thing you just played O.o

Or that 2+2x1=4 :D.

[3cchiFr3ak]

This theory will never be true because you have to think and look into it for a relationship.