Destiny Hero - Malicious : Discussion

[JesusofChaos™]

Using CCV as reasoning for this to be semied is highly incorrect and almost laughable. Using ban worthy cards in reasoning makes the whole argument invalid

[.:pyramid:.]

Using CCV as reasoning for this to be semied is highly incorrect and almost laughable. Using ban worthy cards in reasoning makes the whole argument invalid

 

true but where do you stand, and abusing a broken card doesn't make my argument invalid because it gives more reason to ban ccv. lastly would getting rid of other cards make malicious good at three, or is it not worth it to keep a card semi.

[JesusofChaos™]

Malicious can safely be at 3. This is a discussion about malicious not about ccv thus there was no reason to bring it up. If you have to ban other cards to let one remain, it is better to ban the card which is being abused rather than banning everything it is being abused with.

[Tickle Me Emo]

Malicious can safely be at 3. This is a discussion about malicious not about ccv thus there was no reason to bring it up. If you have to ban other cards to let one remain' date=' it is better to ban the card which is being abused rather than banning everything it is being abused with.

[/quote']

lol at my malicious thread you said he should stay at 2.

[JesusofChaos™]

No i didnt all i said was:

CCV food

 

and

 

This was semi-ed before CCV was mass released

 

Never once did i say it should be semied

[Guest]

Why was it even Semi'd in the first place (I would prefer an expert opinion on this one)?

 

You don't need an expert to figure out Konami logic. Konami saw that a lot of people were running Malicious' date=' so they Semi'd it. Simple as that.

 

Using CCV as reasoning for this to be semied is highly incorrect and almost laughable. Using ban worthy cards in reasoning makes the whole argument invalid

 

true but where do you stand' date=' and abusing a broken card doesn't make my argument invalid because it gives more reason to ban ccv.

[/quote']

 

We don't need "more" reason to ban CCV. It's already banworthy. This discussion is not about CCV, so providing evidence against CCV is not relevant to the topic at hand.

 

lastly would getting rid of other cards make malicious good at three' date=' or is it not worth it to keep a card semi.

[/quote']

 

Here, you are assuming that there are unspecified "other" cards whose removal would "make malicious good at three". (You are also assuming that Malicious is not already "good" at three.) State specifically to which cards you are referring.

[Jericho]

Well, it could be used as a deck thinner in an exodia deck.

[Guest]

Well' date=' it could be used as a deck thinner in an exodia deck.

[/quote']

 

1. So can a whole bunch of things.

2. Exodia should be banned.

[Tickle Me Emo]

No i didnt all i said was:

CCV food

 

and

 

This was semi-ed before CCV was mass released

 

Never once did i say it should be semied

 

my bad, your right.

[Jericho]

Well' date=' it could be used as a deck thinner in an exodia deck.

[/quote']

 

1. So can a whole bunch of things.

2. Exodia should be banned.

 

1. I never said it was the only deck thinner.

2. You're probably right.

[Tickle Me Emo]

Well' date=' it could be used as a deck thinner in an exodia deck.

[/quote']

 

1. So can a whole bunch of things.

2. Exodia should be banned.

 

1. I never said it was the only deck thinner.

2. You're probably right.

 

2. He is right

[Jericho]

Well' date=' it could be used as a deck thinner in an exodia deck.

[/quote']

 

1. So can a whole bunch of things.

2. Exodia should be banned.

 

1. I never said it was the only deck thinner.

2. You're probably right.

 

2. He is right

 

3. no one asked you

[Tickle Me Emo]

Well' date=' it could be used as a deck thinner in an exodia deck.

[/quote']

 

1. So can a whole bunch of things.

2. Exodia should be banned.

 

1. I never said it was the only deck thinner.

2. You're probably right.

 

2. He is right

 

3. no one asked you

 

no need to be so harsh, I was just answering so Crab doesnt need to -.-

[Exiro]

Well' date=' it could be used as a deck thinner in an exodia deck.

[/quote']

 

1. So can a whole bunch of things.

2. Exodia should be banned.

 

1. I never said it was the only deck thinner.

2. You're probably right.

 

2. He is right

 

3. no one asked you

 

no need to be so harsh, I was just answering so Crab doesnt need to -.-

 

3,14159265358979. You forgot to number that reply.

[Tickle Me Emo]

^Thats kinda sad that you know that far into the pie decimal.

[Tabris]

Well' date=' it could be used as a deck thinner in an exodia deck.

[/quote']

 

1. So can a whole bunch of things.

2. Exodia should be banned.

 

1. I never said it was the only deck thinner.

2. You're probably right.

 

1. It's an ineffective deck thinner in Exodia.

 

2, Of course he's right.

[MaliceBloodlust]

Hes not semi-limit or ban worthy it would be a different story if he where 4 star but hes not so stop complaining unless something where to make him broken

[Guest]

Hes not semi-limit or ban worthy it would be a different story if he where 4 star but hes not so stop complaining unless something where to make him broken

 

Someone has been asleep for the past couple of months, and is currently still in a coma.