Wyhe Posted August 18, 2008 Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 Perhaps you have all heard about the infamous Atomic bombings of Hiroshima & Nagasaki, I have several questions for you guys: 1. Do you think that the dropping is for the better or worse? 2. Is this a blessing in disguise or a disaster in the making? 3. Should more atomic weapons be produced? 4. Atomic Weapons-Keepers of peace or Harbingers of The End? Also, watch this video in YouTube regarding the atomic bombs. [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9odsuIcUk5w[/url] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.:|Fallen|:. Posted August 18, 2008 Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 1. Do you think that the dropping is for the better or worse?better 2. Is this a blessing in disguise or a disaster in the making?Is this a blessing in disguise 3. Should more atomic weapons be produced?yes 4. Atomic Weapons-Keepers of peace or Harbingers of of The End?Atomic Weapons Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyhe Posted August 18, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 1. Do you think that the dropping is for the better or worse?worse 2. Is this a blessing in disguise or a disaster in the making?disaster in the making 3. Should more atomic weapons be produced?yes 4. Atomic Weapons-Keepers of peace or Harbingers of of The End?Atomic WeaponsParadox report:If you oppose the atomic weapons, (see Q1 & 2) why would you agree that more should be made? (see Q3) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skuldur Posted August 18, 2008 Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 I hate that they dropped the bomb on Hiroshima on my birthday :( 1. Do you think that the dropping is for the better or worse? worse 2. Is this a blessing in disguise or a disaster in the making? disaster in the making 3. Should more atomic weapons be produced? Hell no 4. Atomic Weapons-Keepers of peace or Harbingers of The End? Harbringers of the End Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted August 18, 2008 Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 1. Do you think that the dropping is for the better or worse?better 2. Is this a blessing in disguise or a disaster in the making?Is this a blessing in disguise 3. Should more atomic weapons be produced?yes 4. Atomic Weapons-Keepers of peace or Harbingers of of The End?Atomic Weapons lol, you do know if people continue to improve nuclear power with making atomic bombs in mind this will only result in the end of the world =P not a really bad thing since we will all die at some point of time right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyhe Posted August 18, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 1. Do you think that the dropping is for the better or worse?better 2. Is this a blessing in disguise or a disaster in the making?Is this a blessing in disguise 3. Should more atomic weapons be produced?yes 4. Atomic Weapons-Keepers of peace or Harbingers of of The End?Atomic Weapons lol' date=' you do know if people continue to improve nuclear power with making atomic bombs in mind this will only result in the end of the world =P not a really bad thing since we will all die at some point of time right?[/quote']That's true...sadly but death by atomic bombs are considered as a fate worse than death Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pikachu Posted August 18, 2008 Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 I can just saythe answers from me is what Skuldur answered....atomic bombs should be banned.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silencerleader Posted August 18, 2008 Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 I can just saythe answers from me is what Skuldur answered....atomic bombs should be banned.... So should nuclear power and noobs... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larxene Posted August 18, 2008 Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 Here's the thing, if all the world's atomic bombs were destroyed, some country, Russia most likely, would make more secretly. Then other countries would rush to make more to defend themselves, so they wouldn't be at a disadvantage. It isn't a bad thing to have them, since the threat of causing a nuclear war keeps them from being used. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davok Posted August 18, 2008 Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 1. Do you think that the dropping is for the better or worse? Worse. I bet my ultimate goal of world domination that a giant radioactive monster will rise up from the ocean because of that bombing. 2. Is this a blessing in disguise or a disaster in the making? Disaster in the making. If you think otherwise, see the movie Godzilla, King of the Monsters. 3. Should more atomic weapons be produced? Yes, so radioactive monsters could wipe out the human race and save the world from humanity. 4. Atomic Weapons-Keepers of peace or Harbingers of The End? Keepers of Peace, because it will cause radioactive monsters to destroy all of humanity and thus usher in a new era of peace on Earth without the blight of humanity on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SushiTheLegend Posted August 18, 2008 Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 1. Do you think that the dropping is for the better or worse? Worse. I bet my ultimate goal of world domination that a giant radioactive monster will rise up from the ocean because of that bombing. 2. Is this a blessing in disguise or a disaster in the making? Disaster in the making. If you think otherwise' date=' see the movie Godzilla, King of the Monsters. 3. Should more atomic weapons be produced? Yes, so radioactive monsters could wipe out the human race and save the world from humanity. 4. Atomic Weapons-Keepers of peace or Harbingers of The End? Keepers of Peace, because it will cause radioactive monsters to destroy all of humanity and thus usher in a new era of peace on Earth without the blight of humanity on it.[/quote']You just said you want to be killed, rofl. 1. Do you think that the dropping is for the better or worse? Clearly it's a bad thing and I hate war makers. 2. Is this a blessing in disguise or a disaster in the making? If anything it is a disaster to the end of us all. 3. Should more atomic weapons be produced? Just NO. I hate war and I hate war makers, and if Russia decides to make them still then fudge them. 4. Atomic Weapons-Keepers of peace or Harbingers of The End? Harbingers of the End, for obvious reasons. MAKE LOVE NOT WAR! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davok Posted August 18, 2008 Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 You just said you want to be killed' date=' rofl.[/quote']Meh, life's overrated anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted August 18, 2008 Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 I can just saythe answers from me is what Skuldur answered....atomic bombs should be banned.... So should nuclear power and noobs... Nuclear power is the most effecient energy on the planet. It should be used EVERYWHERE. However, nuclear weapons should NOT have been used on Japan, better soldiers die than civillians, regardless of country of origin, and these weapons serve no purpose at all other than settling petty disputes between men who think they are more than they are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larxene Posted August 18, 2008 Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 You just said you want to be killed' date=' rofl.[/quote']Meh, life's overrated anyway. I agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyhe Posted August 19, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 I can just saythe answers from me is what Skuldur answered....atomic bombs should be banned.... So should nuclear power and noobs... Nuclear power is the most effecient energy on the planet. It should be used EVERYWHERE. However' date=' nuclear weapons should NOT have been used on Japan, better soldiers die than civillians, regardless of country of origin, and these weapons serve no purpose at all other than settling petty disputes between men who think they are more than they are.[/quote']Nuclear power is very useful,but dangerous. Even if it were not used as a weapon, there will still be after-effects that prove to be harmful in due time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bury the year Posted August 20, 2008 Report Share Posted August 20, 2008 "This ain't a scene, it's a god**** arms race..." So irrelevant, but is relevant at the same time. We've caught ourselves in a vicious cycle; we keep on making more and more bombs to protect ourselves. However, that's not going to stop any terrorists; it's like holding a gun over a mosquito. (Heard that comparison in a book somewhere. :/) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted August 20, 2008 Report Share Posted August 20, 2008 1. For the better. Really. If only their emperor weren't born in the first place, then all of that awful events wouldn't have happened... 2. If you're talking about the bombing of Hiroshima or Nagasaki, well... a blessing in disguise, for their royalty is now "human"... If not, and perchance you think about nuclear weapons, it's a disaster. Not even in the looming. 3. God freaking no. 4. More like keepers of the peace. Give a bomb to a fundamentalist (or whatever religion) - ARMAGEDDON! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted August 20, 2008 Report Share Posted August 20, 2008 1. For the better. Really. If only their emperor weren't born in the first place' date=' then all of that awful events wouldn't have happened... 2. If you're talking about the bombing of Hiroshima or Nagasaki, well... a blessing in disguise, for their royalty is now "human"... If not, and perchance you think about nuclear weapons, it's a disaster. Not even in the looming. 3. God freaking no. 4. More like keepers of the peace. Give a bomb to a fundamentalist (or whatever religion) - ARMAGEDDON![/quote'] Had Japan had a different emperor, and that emperor did not attack America, but helped Hitler's army and attacked the Russians, America would have entered the war too late, and all of Europe would have been ruled by the Nazi Empire, and America would have become it's satellite. However, the Jews would have not been eliminated because Hitler would have never entered the state of desperation where he massacred them at strongest concentration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted August 20, 2008 Report Share Posted August 20, 2008 Oh... possible; after all, the Japanese before 1945 venerated their emperor as a descendant of Amaterasu. But on the part wherein Hitler would have not exterminated the Jews en masse... don't agree. Hitler was a blatant anti-Semite before he became the Fuhrer, and, being a dyed-in-the-wool Catholic, he would have ordered their massacre later... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyhe Posted August 20, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 20, 2008 Oh... possible; after all' date=' the Japanese before 1945 venerated their emperor as a descendant of Amaterasu. But on the part wherein Hitler would have not exterminated the Jews en masse... don't agree. Hitler was a blatant anti-Semite before he became the Fuhrer, and, being a dyed-in-the-wool Catholic, he would have ordered their massacre later...[/quote']I doubt it...he looked only too anxious in "purifying" Germany that he eventually lost the war due to that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian-Exodia Posted August 20, 2008 Report Share Posted August 20, 2008 Oh... possible; after all' date=' the Japanese before 1945 venerated their emperor as a descendant of Amaterasu. But on the part wherein Hitler would have not exterminated the Jews en masse... don't agree. Hitler was a blatant anti-Semite before he became the Fuhrer, and, being a dyed-in-the-wool Catholic, he would have ordered their massacre later...[/quote']I doubt it...he looked only too anxious in "purifying" Germany that he eventually lost the war due to that Hitler committed suicide because he knew that he was going to be captured,so on april 30,he committed suicide,his wife had done the same thing one day eariler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bakura Vessal Posted August 20, 2008 Report Share Posted August 20, 2008 1. Do you think that the dropping is for the better or worse?better 2. Is this a blessing in disguise or a disaster in the making?Is this a blessing in disguise 3. Should more atomic weapons be produced?yes 4. Atomic Weapons-Keepers of peace or Harbingers of of The End?Atomic Weapons lol' date=' you do know if people continue to improve nuclear power with making atomic bombs in mind this will only result in the end of the world =P not a really bad thing since we will all die at some point of time right?[/quote']That's true...sadly but death by atomic bombs are considered as a fate worse than death but wouldnt they make you dead? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian-Exodia Posted August 20, 2008 Report Share Posted August 20, 2008 Yes,whatever you're talking about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyhe Posted August 20, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 20, 2008 1. Do you think that the dropping is for the better or worse?better 2. Is this a blessing in disguise or a disaster in the making?Is this a blessing in disguise 3. Should more atomic weapons be produced?yes 4. Atomic Weapons-Keepers of peace or Harbingers of of The End?Atomic Weapons lol' date=' you do know if people continue to improve nuclear power with making atomic bombs in mind this will only result in the end of the world =P not a really bad thing since we will all die at some point of time right?[/quote']That's true...sadly but death by atomic bombs are considered as a fate worse than death but wouldnt they make you dead?There is a small chance that one may survive the immediate blast,but those people would suffer from the heat & radiation caused by the bombs...that's what makes them so deadly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian-Exodia Posted August 20, 2008 Report Share Posted August 20, 2008 1. Do you think that the dropping is for the better or worse?better 2. Is this a blessing in disguise or a disaster in the making?Is this a blessing in disguise 3. Should more atomic weapons be produced?yes 4. Atomic Weapons-Keepers of peace or Harbingers of of The End?Atomic Weapons lol' date=' you do know if people continue to improve nuclear power with making atomic bombs in mind this will only result in the end of the world =P not a really bad thing since we will all die at some point of time right?[/quote']That's true...sadly but death by atomic bombs are considered as a fate worse than death but wouldnt they make you dead?There is a small chance that one may survive the immediate blast,but those people would suffer from the heat & radiation caused by the bombs...that's what makes them so deadly Yes,i couldn't say it better myself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.