The Mike Posted August 24, 2008 Report Share Posted August 24, 2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gogeta™ Posted August 24, 2008 Report Share Posted August 24, 2008 Nice pic, the effect could be more creative. Since theres no creativity I'll rate 3/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asterr259 Posted August 24, 2008 Report Share Posted August 24, 2008 cool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stunts064 Posted August 24, 2008 Report Share Posted August 24, 2008 you would think a card like this would be better off as a six samari... 4/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pyrotechnet Posted August 24, 2008 Report Share Posted August 24, 2008 The card is good, but it is pretty bland. 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted August 24, 2008 Report Share Posted August 24, 2008 you would think a card like this would be better off as a six samari... 4/10 I agree. Change it so that it's a Six Samurai. Since it would be a Six Samurai, it would have the usual Six Samurai effects; it can only attack twice if you control another Six Samurai monster of a different name, but if it would be destroyed you can destroy another Six Samurai instead. And it should also have 1400 ATK instead of 1000. But then it would need to be Level 4, since you can't have a Level 3 monster doing 2800 damage in one Battle Phase that easily. Finally, just to spice things up, switch the attribute to WIND. Then you'd have an awesome card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Insectivore Posted August 24, 2008 Report Share Posted August 24, 2008 Wilford (I know that's not your Alias), if you gave him 1400 attack, he'd be nearly the same as Nisashi. Besides that would make them the Seven Samurai. i mean, i know about Spirit and Grandmaster, but they're not part of the actual Six. you'd have to call the card something like "Backup Swordsmen of the Six Samurai", or just "Swordsmen of the Six Samurai". If you wanted to make it really new and interesting, try "Guardians of the Six Samurai". P.S. i used Six Samurai so know a bit about them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantasy Dreamz Posted August 24, 2008 Report Share Posted August 24, 2008 this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaos Impact™ Posted August 24, 2008 Report Share Posted August 24, 2008 it looks better as a six samurai 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spire Posted August 24, 2008 Report Share Posted August 24, 2008 -Good pic.-Good OCG.-The effect is too basic. Spire's Rating: 7.4/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted August 24, 2008 Report Share Posted August 24, 2008 Wilford (I know that's not your Alias)' date=' if you gave him 1400 attack, he'd be nearly the same as Nisashi. Besides that would make them the Seven Samurai. i mean, i know about Spirit and Grandmaster, but they're not part of the actual Six. you'd have to call the card something like "Backup Swordsmen of the Six Samurai", or just "Swordsmen of the Six Samurai". If you wanted to make it really new and interesting, try "Guardians of the Six Samurai". P.S. i used Six Samurai so know a bit about them.[/quote'] The point of my post was to make it exactly the same as Nisashi. That's why I modified the ATK, Level, and Attribute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
╬「Selatcia」╬ Posted August 24, 2008 Report Share Posted August 24, 2008 Try giving it a more complex effect. Idea sounds ... ok.7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexander² Posted August 24, 2008 Report Share Posted August 24, 2008 Plain.... 5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.D. Warrior Posted August 24, 2008 Report Share Posted August 24, 2008 this Agreed.6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madsen Posted August 24, 2008 Report Share Posted August 24, 2008 Longer effect needed.I give it a 5/10 for no creativty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.