ITI3L33 Posted August 28, 2008 Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 The reason for my poor OCG, is of my long absence.I do not take credit for this art. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGAKITTY Posted August 28, 2008 Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 Pretty darn good for coming out of hibernation (much better than MY return, lol)You need to specify how the monster is stronger...by level? attack? def?And you need to say what happens after you select the monster...does it get Special Summoned? Returned to your hand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purple Dinosaur Posted August 28, 2008 Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 The wording seems not good. I think the only thing wrong with it would be the last phrase. If re-worded, the rating will definitely bump up. For now, 6.3/10 -PD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ITI3L33 Posted August 28, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 And you need to say what happens after you select the monster...does it get Special Summoned? Returned to your hand? Oh I forgot about that.TY for telling me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kizzi Posted August 28, 2008 Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 Terrible wording. You don't specify which aspect the monster should be stronger in, you don't say what to do after you've searched for it, and you don't say what happens if it isn't destroyed by a monster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ITI3L33 Posted August 28, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 I told y'all I'll be horrible from my absence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGAKITTY Posted August 28, 2008 Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 Terrible wording. You don't specify which aspect the monster should be stronger in' date=' you don't say what to do after you've searched for it, and you don't say what happens if it isn't destroyed by a monster.[/quote'] Thanks for reiterating everything I just said. lol.And I'm pretty sure that, unless said otherwise, things that are destroyed go to the Graveyard, regardless of what destroyed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kizzi Posted August 28, 2008 Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 Terrible wording. You don't specify which aspect the monster should be stronger in' date=' you don't say what to do after you've searched for it, and you don't say what happens if it isn't destroyed by a monster.[/quote'] Thanks for reiterating everything I just said. lol.And I'm pretty sure that, unless said otherwise, things that are destroyed go to the Graveyard, regardless of what destroyed it.1 - I didn't read your post xP2 - That's a basic game mechanic. What's your point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ITI3L33 Posted August 28, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 28, 2008 It could be destroyed and Removed From Play... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kizzi Posted August 29, 2008 Report Share Posted August 29, 2008 It could be destroyed and Removed From Play...What does that have to do with anything? :? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ITI3L33 Posted August 29, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 29, 2008 It's an answer to OMGAKITTY duh... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IxxSIGxxI Posted August 29, 2008 Report Share Posted August 29, 2008 The wording seems not good. I think the only thing wrong with it would be the last phrase. If re-worded' date=' the rating will definitely bump up. For now, 6.3/10 -PD[/quote'] wow your talking about wording...XD. And I quote you "the wording seems not good". Come on dude, seriously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skylarman1 Posted August 29, 2008 Report Share Posted August 29, 2008 the ocg seems wrong to me... but not that bad. 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMGAKITTY Posted August 29, 2008 Report Share Posted August 29, 2008 Terrible wording. You don't specify which aspect the monster should be stronger in' date=' you don't say what to do after you've searched for it, and you don't say what happens if it isn't destroyed by a monster.[/quote'] Thanks for reiterating everything I just said. lol.And I'm pretty sure that, unless said otherwise, things that are destroyed go to the Graveyard, regardless of what destroyed it.1 - I didn't read your post xP2 - That's a basic game mechanic. What's your point? You were complaining that he didn't specify what happens if it's destroyed by non-monster...if it's not specified, it's probably heading toward the Graveyard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kizzi Posted August 29, 2008 Report Share Posted August 29, 2008 Terrible wording. You don't specify which aspect the monster should be stronger in' date=' you don't say what to do after you've searched for it, and you don't say what happens if it isn't destroyed by a monster.[/quote'] Thanks for reiterating everything I just said. lol.And I'm pretty sure that, unless said otherwise, things that are destroyed go to the Graveyard, regardless of what destroyed it.1 - I didn't read your post xP2 - That's a basic game mechanic. What's your point? You were complaining that he didn't specify what happens if it's destroyed by non-monster...if it's not specified, it's probably heading toward the Graveyard.No. I mean the effect triggers, but does nothing. Which is stupid.Also, anyone that can play the game knows that it will generally go to the Graveyard. And I can play the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ITI3L33 Posted August 29, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 29, 2008 OK, I get the point. The wording is bad and all. Now stop the arguing you 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spire Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 -Ok pic.-OCG could be better. Spire's Rating: 6.4/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyhe Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 bad OCG,but good picture...6.11/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brendano Harns Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 7.5/10Fix it, for a 10/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor Cobra Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 Good pic, can, not may, use this: "You can add 1 monster with a level equal to or higher than the attacking monster." 6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBZmaker Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 wow awesome pic, and cool effect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
╬「Selatcia」╬ Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 Pic is cool. Name could be better.everything else stated in previous posts.7.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giga Bowser Posted August 30, 2008 Report Share Posted August 30, 2008 7.8/10Awesome Pic. + 7Reasonable ATK + DEF +1Weird Effect - .2Nicely Done. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ITI3L33 Posted August 31, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 I meant to add to the end of the effect, "The selected monster is now removed from play." And thank y'all for the ratings and comments.I'm getting better rating then I expected.If y'all want to know where I got the pic, it is from deviantart.Link: http://tn3-1.deviantart.com/fs26/300W/i/2008/146/d/b/Hellknight_Eveleon_by_eronzki999.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jump4h Posted August 31, 2008 Report Share Posted August 31, 2008 change it to "...search your opponent's Deck for a monster with an equal or higher ATK than the monster that destroyed this card and add it to your hand." or "...and Special Summon it." if that's what you meant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.