Guest JoshIcy Posted September 14, 2008 Report Share Posted September 14, 2008 There are but two universal truths. I think' date=' therefore I am, and [b']I perceive difference[/b], thus there must be different things, at least to some degree, that I perceive. Human beings are equal in life, and the way we treat them, the right and ability they are given, should be the same given to every human. If we must change the way they are raised to make it so that some of them don't take away the equality of others, we are doing a justice. I am calling it truth to say we are the same. Justice is acting on what is true and righteous in our world. Letting them have freedom of thought only allows them to put each other down. You' date=' sir, are flawed.[/quote'] You forget, I am enlightened. My thinking is not equal with that of others, it is better, it is not based on ethic, it is not based on some ancient phony universal truth, it is based on the truth that we are equal, and that we should act on the truth. It might be a bit cocky to say, but seriously, how can you disagree in a way that makes you more sensible than I, without applying ethic? You just disproved that statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted September 15, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 There are but two universal truths. I think' date=' therefore I am, and [b']I perceive difference[/b], thus there must be different things, at least to some degree, that I perceive. Human beings are equal in life, and the way we treat them, the right and ability they are given, should be the same given to every human. If we must change the way they are raised to make it so that some of them don't take away the equality of others, we are doing a justice. I am calling it truth to say we are the same. Justice is acting on what is true and righteous in our world. Letting them have freedom of thought only allows them to put each other down. You' date=' sir, are flawed.[/quote'] You forget, I am enlightened. My thinking is not equal with that of others, it is better, it is not based on ethic, it is not based on some ancient phony universal truth, it is based on the truth that we are equal, and that we should act on the truth. It might be a bit cocky to say, but seriously, how can you disagree in a way that makes you more sensible than I, without applying ethic? You just disproved that statement. No, I exempted myself from it. Learn to read. Allows does not mean the same as mandates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 There are but two universal truths. I think' date=' therefore I am, and [b']I perceive difference[/b], thus there must be different things, at least to some degree, that I perceive. Human beings are equal in life, and the way we treat them, the right and ability they are given, should be the same given to every human. If we must change the way they are raised to make it so that some of them don't take away the equality of others, we are doing a justice. I am calling it truth to say we are the same. Justice is acting on what is true and righteous in our world. Letting them have freedom of thought only allows them to put each other down. You' date=' sir, are flawed.[/quote'] You forget, I am enlightened. My thinking is not equal with that of others, it is better, it is not based on ethic, it is not based on some ancient phony universal truth, it is based on the truth that we are equal, and that we should act on the truth. It might be a bit cocky to say, but seriously, how can you disagree in a way that makes you more sensible than I, without applying ethic? You just disproved that statement. No, I exempted myself from it. Learn to read. Allows does not mean the same as mandates. Then I fail to see the point of that post other than simple defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted September 15, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 There are but two universal truths. I think' date=' therefore I am, and [b']I perceive difference[/b], thus there must be different things, at least to some degree, that I perceive. Human beings are equal in life, and the way we treat them, the right and ability they are given, should be the same given to every human. If we must change the way they are raised to make it so that some of them don't take away the equality of others, we are doing a justice. I am calling it truth to say we are the same. Justice is acting on what is true and righteous in our world. Letting them have freedom of thought only allows them to put each other down. You' date=' sir, are flawed.[/quote'] You forget, I am enlightened. My thinking is not equal with that of others, it is better, it is not based on ethic, it is not based on some ancient phony universal truth, it is based on the truth that we are equal, and that we should act on the truth. It might be a bit cocky to say, but seriously, how can you disagree in a way that makes you more sensible than I, without applying ethic? You just disproved that statement. No, I exempted myself from it. Learn to read. Allows does not mean the same as mandates. Then I fail to see the point of that post other than simple defense. I misread it myself, then reread it, then felt like a retard. Resolve: No ones perfect, but I'm closer to it than others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 There are but two universal truths. I think' date=' therefore I am, and [b']I perceive difference[/b], thus there must be different things, at least to some degree, that I perceive. Human beings are equal in life, and the way we treat them, the right and ability they are given, should be the same given to every human. If we must change the way they are raised to make it so that some of them don't take away the equality of others, we are doing a justice. I am calling it truth to say we are the same. Justice is acting on what is true and righteous in our world. Letting them have freedom of thought only allows them to put each other down. You' date=' sir, are flawed.[/quote'] You forget, I am enlightened. My thinking is not equal with that of others, it is better, it is not based on ethic, it is not based on some ancient phony universal truth, it is based on the truth that we are equal, and that we should act on the truth. It might be a bit cocky to say, but seriously, how can you disagree in a way that makes you more sensible than I, without applying ethic? You just disproved that statement. No, I exempted myself from it. Learn to read. Allows does not mean the same as mandates. Then I fail to see the point of that post other than simple defense. I misread it myself, then reread it, then felt like a retard. Resolve: No ones perfect, but I'm closer to it than others. Contradicting to my belief then as I believe no one is perfect or even close to it. But rather we are all the same as others, (defended by article I sent to you via AIM). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted September 16, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 16, 2008 ^^ That's taken right from the movie "The Secret." Actually, its the entire basis of the movie. Perfect is what I have defined by what I have defined as truth. I know only two truths, possibly one, definitely not 0, but probably two. However, perfection is acting on these truths. It is right to act on truth, and disagreeing with this is disagreeing with the truth in itself. We exist to live, and in life, we act, think, believe etc... The truth is that we are because we think, thus all conscious things are conscious because they have defined themselves as conscious, and are thus equal, because they are the same, regardless of their own perception. If we do not act on this standard of equality, and accept that it was our inevitable fate to exist in the first place, and assume that some are not equal, or worse, know we are equal but not act on it, then we have what we have today. Racism, Fear, Greed, Lust, Anger, Grief, Envy, and worst of all, Inaction, either generally, or not to try and change it for what the little universal truth we can define as real defines as justice. p.s. I know what stage of realization you are in now. I was there some time ago, maybe 6 months, maybe 18, I cannot remember clearly, where I claimed that nothing is true because we cannot perceive it to be. You'll get over it, some things will just come to you and your perception will change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted September 16, 2008 Report Share Posted September 16, 2008 rofl, this is where me and you don't meet. One day we must do an IM conversation, you seem like an interesting entity to learn from and a very adept one at that. I would love to hear you preach. And yet again, you are ultimately kill by perception. Even though you see all this, within the eyes of one does not force the view of the many... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted September 17, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 17, 2008 ^^ That is what I hope to change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasterOfMagicians Posted September 19, 2008 Report Share Posted September 19, 2008 What you are suggesting is mass-parenting. A group educates and raises children as a whole instead of individual family units. It is this cohesion of families that makes our desires so strong, and our will to better ourselves that much greater.Nobody wants to do what their parents did, so they try and better themselves. The influences they receive from their parenting units helps them make the right judgements and brings them along a path that will help them become an active and useful member of society. If anything it is society that brings the downfall of the individual, not the individual brings downfall to the society. Society is at a point now where it molds people without them even realizing it. Models are too thin, giving females unrealistic images of the female form, making them desire to be skinnier and creating a mass of mental and health problems along the way. Individual Family Units are necessary for the peaceful cohesion and evolution of our race. Just because it may work for some planet on Star Trek or Star Wars, doesn't mean its going to work for mankind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Static Posted September 19, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 19, 2008 It also does not mean that it will not work. The human race, as far as evolution is concerned, doesn't need to go any further, its beings are mentally capable of contentment, and that's as much evolution as our society as a whole requires to be able to live among others in peace. If parents did not differ in ideals and tactics, then all the children would be raised the same, to exist for the same purpose, to live for their society and live among each other in peace. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.