ShadowKyogre Posted September 5, 2008 Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 Even more conversions of MtG cards. Sometimes I used my own conversion system. Artist credits are on the cards, except for changed bgs: fealasy.deviantart.com Deities are an archetype similar to the Archfiends, meaning that some cards are designated as Deities although it is not in their name. That includes Godhead of Awe. This is the first of a series of conversions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee Posted September 5, 2008 Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 I see the grammar/OCG is wrong, and, I think saying "This card inflicts Peircing Damage" is not right... Try to work on your grammar/ocg.I will gladly help you if you ask however ^_^ - Yankeefan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infernalhero Posted September 5, 2008 Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 Nice card,I like it.10/12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saturn of Elemia Posted September 5, 2008 Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 Nice. That is one of my fav MTG cards. OCG is pretty solid; I prefer the 'Piercing Damage' to the whole text. Great job.9.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowKyogre Posted September 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 This card inflicts Piercing Damage has actually appeared on a card, on one of the Cyberdark pieces. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saturn of Elemia Posted September 5, 2008 Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 I know. I like it SO much better than the old text. Have you made Niv-Mizzet the Firemind into a card yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Ruler v0id Posted September 5, 2008 Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 i like the cards, but the second should probably read something like this:"During each players' Standby Phase, he/she loses 800 Life Points" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowKyogre Posted September 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 Not yet. I'm thinking of 2 a day, starting with my favorite spirits. I want to do that next. (note, next card will be extremely OP, don't blame me for it) @DarkRuler: I'm only going to modify Seizan only if his fx still feel the same. Without the draw fx, he wouldn't be the perverter of truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Ruler v0id Posted September 5, 2008 Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 oh sorry forgot about the 2 cards thing... yeah keep that... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee Posted September 5, 2008 Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 I don't quite know how to word it, but I KNOW the 2nd cards grammar/ocg is off. - Yankeefan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saturn of Elemia Posted September 5, 2008 Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 Seizan was EVIL! This would be broken in YGO. I like it. Perfect replica.10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowKyogre Posted September 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 I know Seizan was evils! XP. Now I'm going to do Izzet and another spirit! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yankee Posted September 5, 2008 Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 On the 2nd card, the pic doesn't fit... On the third card, you spelled Battle, "vattle"And,The last card is overpowerd, and has a bad pic to me.... These are ok, but I keep spotting minor errors on these cards... Good overall however ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowKyogre Posted September 5, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 5, 2008 I didn't spell Battle vattle, I checked it recently. If you ask me, the Swans are overpowered. And yeah...some things I don't know how to convert. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowKyogre Posted September 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 7, 2008 Bumpishness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowKyogre Posted September 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 Bumpishness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Supreme Gamesmaster Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 ... :O ...You stole my idea. And I'd finished Necropotence too. :( :( :( :( Oyobi OCG: During battle between this attacking card and a Defense Position monster whose DEF is lower than the ATK of this card, inflict the difference as Battle Damage to your opponent. Whenever you activate an "Arcane" Spell or Trap Card, or Summon a "Deity" monster, Special Summon 1 "Oyobi Token" (Winged Beast-Type/LIGHT/Level 3/ATK 1200/DEF 1200) in Defense Position. Oyobi Tokens can attack your opponent directly.Oyobi Playability: Major loopholes here, works with any card with "Deity" or "Arcane" in its name, and I'm certain there's many in the fake card community. Because of that, it might be runnable; however, I figure the main purpose of Oyobi Tokens would be Tributes (Diabolos, Obelisk...). No time for rates on others ibidem, coming back soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bury the year Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 Swans of Brynn Argoll = major deck-out help. 'Specially with cards like Greed, and, if you make its conversion, Forced Fruitation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowKyogre Posted September 10, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 10, 2008 Gamemaster: Certainly the idea isn't unique...I know that...Spirits are an actual type in MtG.Tectonix:I knows! Especially against beatdown! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.