TwinSnakes Posted September 7, 2008 Report Share Posted September 7, 2008 1st Dragon type card I made...let me know what you think. please rate and leave comments. Image Credit goes to: Craig Snedecker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darklord-pain Posted September 7, 2008 Report Share Posted September 7, 2008 nice pic but bad OCG 5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Welche Posted September 7, 2008 Report Share Posted September 7, 2008 I like it, good for a first. 8.3/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bengal Posted September 7, 2008 Report Share Posted September 7, 2008 Pretty good for a first, the picture is cool, but it is a bit overpowered, lower its ATK to under 3000 for a start. Also here are just some OCG fixes: graveyard = Graveyard "as a result of battle" = "by battle" 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwinSnakes Posted September 8, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 8, 2008 thanks for the ratings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zombiefire78 Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 It's pretty cool, summoning conditions are a little harsh. But hey, got to pay the price to use a great effect, hm? I'd advise you lower it's ATK to maybe 2900 or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwinSnakes Posted September 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 thanks man but since the summoning conditions are harsh wouldn't the attack be worth it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwinSnakes Posted September 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 thanks evryone for the ratings and comments ^_^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delta Guardian Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 wow nice pic and OCG its a little strong i'd try reducing the ATK to 3200 and the DEF to 2800 maybe 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spitfire skateboards Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 nice for first 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor Cobra Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 Good pic and effect, seems balanced. 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwinSnakes Posted September 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 thanks i think it could be better but thats just me plus no car is perfect thats why i nvr give higher than a 9.7 rating Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jabura86 Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 uhm.. i think the cost of summon is elevate..i would make 2 light and 2 dark monsters.. not 3 and 3.. :)8.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwinSnakes Posted September 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 ok i can change it but i thought i would make it 3 and 3 since the cards attack is so high plus the card's effect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delta Guardian Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 mmm ya but idk maybe reduce it to 2 and 2 like jabura said and reduce the ATK and DEF to 3200/3200 maybe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
king7586 Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 for a first not bad but some ocg errors 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwinSnakes Posted September 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 ahh ya mmm wat would the OCG errors be? i've been looking for them but couldn't find any that i can see anyway but thanks for the comment :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 Lower the ATK to at most 2300. The effect's too powerful just to be given on a 3400 ATK monster; besides, it's ridiculously easy to mill 3 LIGHT and 3 DARK monsters to the Graveyard these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypony Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 a little overpowered,since theres nearly 0 monsters with original attack that can defend against that card so,heavy storm,attack until no more monsters,direct=win.change the effect so it can't keep attacking unless theirs a price.and 3 LIGHT 3 DARK,rarely anyone has a deck like that.6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 A simple Lighsworn build, acommodating this and a few other DARKs, will do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cardmakerfoo Posted September 10, 2008 Report Share Posted September 10, 2008 you can try saying this for the last line: If this card destroys your opponent's monster as a result of battle, this card can attack again during this turn. not much OCG errors, alot of ppl say that, but i don't find anything wrong with the OCG except for that last line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Rebellious Rage~ Posted September 10, 2008 Report Share Posted September 10, 2008 7/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AncientPhoenix Posted September 10, 2008 Report Share Posted September 10, 2008 Whats OCG? And 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TwinSnakes Posted September 11, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 11, 2008 thanks for all the input guys now the card is more balanced i believe as far as summoning conditions, effect, and ATK..let me know wat u think of the changes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atomix Posted September 12, 2008 Report Share Posted September 12, 2008 Nice it can wipe out all your opponent's monsters then attack them directly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.