Docomodake Posted September 14, 2008 Report Share Posted September 14, 2008 I could have said something wittier. D:But, anyhow, (I so got all pics from Photobucket) I made some Pychic-type monsters. If you feel like looking, by all means, look. The set (I so got all pics from Photobucket) is called "Psychic Enchantment", 'cause I had to think of something. By the way, (I so got all the pics from Photobucket) in case you were wondering, I got all of the pictures from http://www.photobucket.com. ^^ Monsters! Spells! Card Lore! Luna, the Forbidden This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card cannot be Special Summoned except by Tributing 3 face-up Psychic-type monsters on your side of the field. Once, every other turn, you may pay 1000 Life Points to destroy a card on your opponents side of the field. Based on the type of the card, apply 1 of the following effects: - Monster: Take control of the destroyed card until the End Phase, then send it to your opponent's Graveyard. - Spell: Special Summon 1 Psychic-type monster from your hand or deck. Destroy the Special Summoned monster during your next End Phase. - Trap: Add 1 Spell or Trap Card from your deck to your hand. This card cannot attack your opponent directly. The Magical Doll Once per turn, pay 500 Life Points to treat this card as an Equip Spell Card and equip it to a face-up Psychic-type monster. When this card is equipped to a monster, roll a six-sided die. The outcome of the roll apllies 1 of the following effects: - 1-3: Destroy this card. - 4-6: Destroy 1 face-up monster on your opponent's side of the field. If the equipped monster is destroyed, Special Summon this card to the field. If this card is destroyed, destroy the equipped monster. EDIT 1: Changed Vera's effect to make it more understandable.EDIT 2: Changed Raz's effect because it was OP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Catman25 Posted September 14, 2008 Report Share Posted September 14, 2008 7.2/10 good pics Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Docomodake Posted September 14, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2008 7.2/10 good picsThanks. ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teramaster Posted September 14, 2008 Report Share Posted September 14, 2008 I don't understand Vera's effect...Raz is a tiny bit overpowered, since its effect is much better than Don Zaloog's.Luna is also a bit overpowered. There should never be an effect that directly searches for a spell in your deck.As for the rest, 10/10. ALso keep in mind when you make Psychics that there's EMergency Teleport. Don't make cards of LV3 that would be too powerful if they would be searchable. YOu didn't do it here, so keep it up that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Docomodake Posted September 14, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2008 I don't understand Vera's effect...Raz is a tiny bit overpowered' date=' since its effect is much better than Don Zaloog's.Luna is illegible.As for the rest, 10/10. ALso keep in mind when you make Psychics that there's EMergency Teleport. Don't make cards of LV3 that would be too powerful if they would be searchable. YOu didn't do it here, so keep it up that way.[/quote'] Vera's effect is a once-every-other-turn Brain Control. Raz IS a bit OP. Luna's effect is under "Card Lore".Thank you for your rate. <3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teramaster Posted September 14, 2008 Report Share Posted September 14, 2008 Yoou're welcome.And in Vera's effect, you might consider not using Special Summon, but "take control of". That's what was confusing.Edited comment for Luna. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Docomodake Posted September 14, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 14, 2008 New cards posted. <3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xemba Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 Kaine is OP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teramaster Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 Hey, thanks a lot for giving me +1 reputation ^^And I don't think Kaine is OP, since it's a once-per-duel effect. Despite the fact it can summon Raviel, since Raviel is vulnerable to EVERYTHING.As for the new cards:Eri - 9.5/10. Negate 1 attack should be changed to something liek "negate the attack of 1 of your opponent's monsters." I liek teh effect and the card overall.Rei - 9.8/10. Very original and playable. But you forgot one thing - each Psychic has a LP cost.LaM - well, teh OCG is a bit off, but a good card still. Something liek "Any Effect damage you take from a monster's effect is halved." should do it. Did you want to include Life Points payment too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Docomodake Posted September 15, 2008 Author Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 Hey' date=' thanks a lot for giving me +1 reputation ^^And I don't think Kaine is OP, since it's a once-per-duel effect. Despite the fact it can summon Raviel, since Raviel is vulnerable to EVERYTHING.As for the new cards:Eri - 9.5/10. Negate 1 attack should be changed to something liek "negate the attack of 1 of your opponent's monsters." I liek teh effect and the card overall.Rei - 9.8/10. Very original and playable. But you forgot one thing - each Psychic has a LP cost.LaM - well, teh OCG is a bit off, but a good card still. Something liek "Any Effect damage you take from a monster's effect is halved." should do it. Did you want to include Life Points payment too?[/quote'] On Kaine: That's what I thought too. Plus, it costs more than an eighth of your total LP to Summon.On Eri: I guess so. I'll probably patch that up when I have time.On Rei: Damn! My one original idea, and I forgot the freaking LP cost! >:( I'm mad at you, Rei.On LaM: That's what I was pretty much going for. An LP cost, IMO, is a little unnecessary, because with only 1 monster on the field, it could get destroyed easily. With an MST or LV, the combo would be destroyed. Plus, this whole thing was so that you'd pay less for Psychic effects. Adding an LP cost of like, 300, would make you pay more for monsters like Wata. Emba and Eri. But, on monsters such as Luna, it would knock down the price by 200... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teramaster Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 Actually, when I said "Did you want to include Life Points payment too?" I meant in teh effect of LaM, if it should have LP payment or not. Life Point payment (that comes from Psyhcics) won't be halved by LaM the way you constructed it. In that case, you should say "Halve the amount of Life Points you have to pay to activate an Effect monster's effect." But that only halves costs. Not sure how you would construct a sentence that halves both payment and Direct damage (it's called Effect Damage today). Maybe something like "Whenever you take Effect damage or pay Life Points due to an Effect Monster's effect, halve the amount of Life Points you would lose." Not sure if that's teh proper OCG though. So remember: Cost is not damage. Psychics have costs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parting Shot Posted September 15, 2008 Report Share Posted September 15, 2008 Personally, I think they'd be better as Spellcasters. Psychics are usually technological in pic, and I do believe all of them have an effect including some kind of Life Point payment, whereas your cards do not. Pretty decent cards despite that, though. overall - 12.76/13.69 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.