Jump to content

My Masters Set(Cool)


cameronj

How good out of 10 is my card set?  

1 member has voted

  1. 1. How good out of 10 is my card set?



Recommended Posts

First, your master set does not rule.

 

The only cards that are any good are the ones that gain attack from other masters on the field, those who you have to tribute 4 masters for and have ATK/ DEF equal to the # of cards in your hand, ad those who can attack directly. The latter 2 are OPed.

The rest of the cards I can imagine as being used to help the former 2, however, there are simply too many of them. You would never put that many in a deck. Ever. You wouldn't.

 

I can almost tell what you're trying to do with these cards. The problem is, I can't actually tell what you're trying to do with these cards. I'd hate to actually have to say this, but if you can't come up with cards to be used in combination with your other ones, make less cards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What? Are you dissing my cards?

 

Look, I can see you put a lot of effort into these. I just wanted to say it didn't "rule." I realize now that you might have done that because it was the "masters" set. In which case I apologize for that.

 

Anyway, I counted 36 cards, most of which the effects were "This card's attribute is also treated as______" or "This card's type is also treated as______", and in the latter case all of them need to be capitalized.

 

So, 11 of the cards have almost the same effect (not counting the ones that aren't showing up on my computer). The "Master of Cyborg" actually says "this card's attribute is also treated as machine." A minor error. Plus 3 more with no effect at all, and fairly useless ATK and DEF.

Also, some of the cards are way unbalanced. 1 tribute for 2400 attacking your opponent directly. Which is a lot. The effect of Frasus is a little OPed.

 

Anyway, I don't want to just say "these cards are bad" without giving a reason, and neither without suggestions, so here goes: lower the number of cards. Most of the cards that aren't "this card's ________ is treated as ____" has an effect that has little relation to other effects (excepting certain ones). If you made less cards, but combined the 2 effects, for example, master of plant and the Pegasus, you would have some better cards. The secondary effects wouldn't have to change, because the effect of "this card's ________ is treated as ____" would unify them. It's okay to have some monsters that still only have one effect, just don't make them a large percentage of the total. I also suggest adding some spell/trap cards to fill up spaces of the cards you took out. Also, more effects that are related to master-type monsters need to be made. These would be good spell/trap cards.

 

Anyway, try to remember that this is only my opinion. If you think the cards are perfect, then don't change them at all.

 

EDIT: Sorry if I offended you. Also, Daleks FTW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...