Jump to content

what happens when Hunter doesn't make cards in a long time...


Huntar!

So, am I still a decent cardmaker?  

1 member has voted

  1. 1. So, am I still a decent cardmaker?

    • Yeah Hunter, you rock! Teach some of these n00bz something with your incredible awesomeness.
    • Eh.. practice more, you'll get your incredible awesomeness back.


Recommended Posts

lol at the title right?

 

But yeah, this is what happens when I haven't made cards in weeks. >.>

 

Thanks to Wolfy for making the most epic pics ever. The guy is absolutely amazing..

 

I have always hated very long effects, so if you say my effects are too short, Im going to send you hate-pms. FYI, long effects aren't realistic. If I cant read your text, your card isn't realistic.

 

Here are the cradz. [yes, I spelled it that way for fun]

 

If you want me to post the text, you are blind, or need glasses, because the print is very, very readable.

 

[align=center]Archaic Traveler, Kappa the Clown

 

43114oz9.jpg

 

Sunight

 

43114ah2.jpg[/align]

 

Wolfy owns the art, I just edited it.

 

If bloody changed the rules on me, and I am missing something, please tell me.

 

Enjoy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a minor point, the 1st card's name - I would (you can ignore this all together if you want) either remove the comma from the name, making Archaic Traveler like an Archtype (like Elemental Hero is), or have it as 'Kappa the Clown, Archaic Traveler'. But that's not really imortant.

 

OCG:

1st Card - I don't think 'Each turn' is necessary due to you mentioning a Phase to activate the effect, and the last line (this is treated as an attack...) I thinks should be in brackets.

2nd Card - I need you to explain what you mean by "During the turn that this card would be Special Summoned", since it's effects can only be activated after it has been summoned not while it is summoned.

 

Pics are good (surprise, surprise... coming from wolf and all), and just naming the 2nd card "Sunlight" is different from how cards are named these days so that's good too. Effects are balanced and effective.

 

Card Ratings: 8/10, 8/10

Couple Rating: 8/10

 

P.S. I don't think it makes a card unrealistic if the effect is long and becomes unreadable without posting it outside the card, since it's not our fault how the card maker is programmed to react (not complaining about the programming of the card maker or anything, since I couldn't do a better job at it).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1st card.

OCG: 1.7/2 Almost perfect.

Pic: .5/1 The edit is crappeh.

Effect: .9/1

Name: 1/1 Kool.

Attribute/Type: .5/1 Dark type plox.

Originality: .8/1 It is original. But not THAT much.

Playability: .6/1 Would give it Limited.

Balance: .6/1 Op'ed.

P.I: .7/1

Total = 7.3/10

 

2nd card

OCG: 1.7/2 Again, almost perfect

Pic: .8/1 That one is better :D

Effect: .7/1

Name: .6/1 Could have more?

Attribute/Type: .7/1 Would give it spellcaster, but fairy fits it too.

Originality: .6/1 =/.

Playability: .5/1 Limited.

Balance: .6/1 More OP'ed

P.I: .5/1 This one is worse.. =/.

Total = 6.7/10

 

Well, you've been away for some time.

Still, good job Hunter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest JoshIcy

Well' date=' the grammar/ocg is painfull, and the effects are a lil underwhelming. Though, for not making cards in a while, they are allright ^_^

 

6.7/10

[/quote']

 

lol Not everyone can word tricky effects well...

But I am gonna q4t this post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well' date=' the grammar/ocg is painfull, and the effects are a lil underwhelming. Though, for not making cards in a while, they are allright ^_^

 

6.7/10

[/quote']

 

lol Not everyone can word tricky effects well...

But I am gonna q4t this post.

Well, thats true, however, the wording of some of these are way off...Hunter should know how to word most of those...

 

BTW, 7000!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...