Jump to content

>>Spellwarped Creatures <<


laconus

Should I continue with this Sub-Type, and would you use them?  

1 member has voted

  1. 1. Should I continue with this Sub-Type, and would you use them?

    • Yes, you should continue with this idea
    • No, you should not continue with this idea
      0
    • It might be interersting to continue with this idea
    • Yes, I would use them
    • No, I would not use them
      0
    • It is possible that I would use them
      0


Recommended Posts

My Newest Card That I Have Made. Rate And Comment However You Want, But If You See An OCG Error, Or If You Think The Card Is Over/Under-Powered Please State Why! (I Don't Claim Ownership For Any Of The Artwork Used On My Cards, Unless Stated Otherwise)

[align=center]

This is the first card in a new line of sub-type monsters called Spellwarped. Spellwarped monsters are creatures that have been altered by magic and gain effects when targeted by Spell Cards.

---------------------------------------------

Octempusa

 

2k3r40.jpg

Pic Link & Artist: Octopus gotgituey (Deviant Art)

 

If this card was summoned during a turn in which a Spell Card was played, place 1 Spellwarped Counter on this card. When this card is the target of a Spell Card, you can select and activate 1 of the following effects: -Place 1 Spellwarped Counter on this card. - Draw 1 card from your Deck. If this card would be destroyed by battle, remove 1 Spellwarped Counter from it, and it is not destroyed. (Damage calculation is applied normally). If there are no Spellwarped Counters on this face-up card, destroy it.

[/align]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are still OCG errors, but I like the card. The effect is interesting and the picture is good.

 

The card seems balanced aswell, but I don't know how usable it would be.

 

OCG errors:

 

summoned = Summoned

"is the target of a Spell Card" = "is selected as a target of a Spell Card"

 

8/10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, this could have been executed without the need for a subtype. the only reason you would need one is because of a set of rules they might need, and they set themselves apart from the rest of the cards that way. This could have been a wicked archetype. ^_^

 

i like the idea, but the OCG is still a bit off. you dont need "from your deck" after 'draw 1 card.'

 

and you should phrase it: "If this card would be destroyed by battle, remove [insert name here] Counter to negate its destructon. (Damage calculation is still applied normally.)"

 

that way makes more sense. ^_^

 

keep it up, i believe that they have a lot of potential. ^_^

 

Rating so far: B-

 

~K

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...