Jump to content

Almost Impossible Question


CeDeFiA

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 200
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The collision would be never ending and you would have a constant outpour of energy until either is destroyed. Basically, what that would look like is this unstoppable force eternally trying to push the immovable object on the spot?

 

Took me like 10 minutes to come up with..it better be right lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The collision would be never ending and you would have a constant outpour of energy until either is destroyed. Basically' date=' what that would look like is this unstoppable force eternally trying to push the immovable object on the spot?

 

Took me like 10 minutes to come up with..it better be right lol

[/quote']

 

Wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The collision would be never ending and you would have a constant outpour of energy until either is destroyed. Basically' date=' what that would look like is this unstoppable force eternally trying to push the immovable object on the spot?

 

Took me like 10 minutes to come up with..it better be right lol

[/quote']

 

Wrong.

Jesus! There's no Real Answer to this Question!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The collision would be never ending and you would have a constant outpour of energy until either is destroyed. Basically' date=' what that would look like is this unstoppable force eternally trying to push the immovable object on the spot?

 

Took me like 10 minutes to come up with..it better be right lol

[/quote']

 

Wrong.

Jesus! There's no Real Answer to this Question!

 

 

Something happened. Tell Draco that!

Wrong

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest King of Games

The force of the of the unstoppable object is transferred to the unmovable object, like the five balls suspended in a row, forget if it has a special name

Link to comment
Share on other sites

None of these answers are mine. But, are any right?

_________________________________________________________________________________

Presumably the unstoppable object would bounce off at an angle, they would both remain undamaged and the immovable object would remain stationary. That way, all rules are abided by and everybody wins.

_________________________________________________________________________________

You would obviously not find this in nature anywhere (if you have please tell me immediately and we will be rich beyond our wildest dreams!!)

The collision would be neverending and you would have a constant outpour of energy until either is destroyed (which apparently is never). Basically, what that would look like is this unstoppable force eternally trying to push the immovable object on the spot.

_________________________________________________________________________________

Isaac Asimov explained that if you say there IS an "unstoppable" force

in the universe, then you are saying there are no immovable objects in

the universe. So, it's a nonsensical question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An immovable object would have infinite inertia though rite' date=' and infinite mass rite?would its gravity be to powerful

[/quote']

 

 

None of these answers are mine. But' date=' are any right?

_________________________________________________________________________________

Presumably the unstoppable object would bounce off at an angle, they would both remain undamaged and the immovable object would remain stationary. That way, all rules are abided by and everybody wins.

_________________________________________________________________________________

You would obviously not find this in nature anywhere (if you have please tell me immediately and we will be rich beyond our wildest dreams!!)

The collision would be neverending and you would have a constant outpour of energy until either is destroyed (which apparently is never). Basically, what that would look like is this unstoppable force eternally trying to push the immovable object on the spot.

_________________________________________________________________________________

Isaac Asimov explained that if you say there IS an "unstoppable" force

in the universe, then you are saying there are no immovable objects in

the universe. So, it's a nonsensical question.

[/quote']

 

Wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there cannot be an unstoppable force because it would use infinite amounts of energy and the laws of (energy) conservation prohibit this.

 

However theoretically.....

 

The Immovable Object would requre an infinite amount of energy to move, and although The Unstoppable Force has infinite energy, you cant get MORE than infinity, and they would cancel each other out.

 

So The Immoveable Object would win by default.??

Is that rite?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...