woodmouse Posted October 24, 2008 Report Share Posted October 24, 2008 I don't own the pic. This card is quite weird, maybe, and it possibly has ocg errors. Anyway, here it is: Ok, I know no one can read the effect, so I put it here:"Blue-Eyes White Dragon"+"Blue-Eyes White Dragon" While this card is Summoned, choose one of these effects: -Increase the ATK of all Dragon-type monsters you control by 500. -Increase the ATK of all LIGHT-attribute monsters you control by 500. --------------------------------------- When this card is destroyed by battle, Summon any Dragon-type monster from your hand to the field in face up attack position. ----------------------------------------- When this card is affected by a spell or trap card, you may choose 1 card from your graveyard and return it to your hand. If you do this, your opponent gains 1000 Life Points. ----------------------------------------- If this card is returned to hand or field from graveyard, destroy all monsters you control. ----------------------------------------- Increase this card's DEF by 500 for the amount of cards in your hand. What do you think? Is it good? Or overpowered?:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted October 24, 2008 Report Share Posted October 24, 2008 Meh typical DA picture...And the card is useless + unplayable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woodmouse Posted October 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 24, 2008 What do you mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted October 24, 2008 Report Share Posted October 24, 2008 Winged Dragon of RA is not a legit card...It doesn't even have the proper effect written on it etc... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woodmouse Posted October 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 24, 2008 Ok, I edited the fusion things so it is fusion of two Blue-Eyes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DemonSlayer665 Posted October 24, 2008 Report Share Posted October 24, 2008 gets should be gains Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woodmouse Posted October 24, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 24, 2008 Oh. Ok, I changed that now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K.B. strategist Posted October 24, 2008 Report Share Posted October 24, 2008 When instead of WhileDragon-TypeTake out -attribute after LIGHT.Special Summon instead of SummonAttack Positiontargeted instead of affectedSpell or Trap Cardselect instead of chooseGraveyard Either way starting attack is 4000...And please don't use that pic ever again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaca Posted October 24, 2008 Report Share Posted October 24, 2008 Don't use codes for the effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor Cobra Posted October 24, 2008 Report Share Posted October 24, 2008 For the card name, capitalize only the first letter, face-up Attack Position, Special Summon, not Summon, pic is used, Spell or Trap Card, When this card is Fusion Summoned, you can, Graveyard, change level to 9. 4/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gustavosuarez Posted October 24, 2008 Report Share Posted October 24, 2008 good card. 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woodmouse Posted October 25, 2008 Author Report Share Posted October 25, 2008 ...Ok, too much to change. At least for now.But I thought there isn't Special Summon anymore? I mean, I checked the ocg thread and there was that every summon thing is Summon now... Well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnSlaUghT Posted October 25, 2008 Report Share Posted October 25, 2008 this card has done already and this card also is very over powered because it gets 3 effects for only two blue eyes, while BEUD which is a fusion of 3, has no effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.