ragnarok1945 Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 Great' date=' now we can focus on taking over Canada.[/quote'] you know i all was imagined once the EU was finely formed around all out Europe the US would assimilate Canada, Mexico, and all or most of South America. Why not just say the whole world then? Seems to make it so much easier Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freeman The Master Posted November 29, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 Great' date=' now we can focus on taking over Canada.[/quote'] you know i all was imagined once the EU was finely formed around all out Europe the US would assimilate Canada, Mexico, and all or most of South America. Why not just say the whole world then? Seems to make it so much easier why the world there right next Door to the US. the world will come later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 and then it'll be pouring the money for NASA for the conquest of space Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freeman The Master Posted November 29, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 and then it'll be pouring the money for NASA for the conquest of space To late the US all ready controls the sky above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 that's only the sky above the Earth, I'm talking OUTER space Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Wolf Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 that's only the sky above the Earth' date=' I'm talking OUTER space[/quote'] outer space>normal space Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freeman The Master Posted November 29, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 that's only the sky above the Earth' date=' I'm talking OUTER space[/quote'] ya thats what i am talking about the Sky above the sky. we have the most satellites, we have majority control of the ISS, and we landed on the moon, next is mars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 how right you are, and that's what will be next Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freeman The Master Posted November 29, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 then that will be it in till we get warp drive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 oh that's just black hole tech. Once we've controlled enough of the universe we'll be able to know how to make those easily Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntar! Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 Hmmm.... now what will the almighty American Empire conquer next? Lets invade Mexico. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 Wouldn't surprise me after what happened in the Mexican War Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huntar! Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 lol150+ years ago Mexico can't win a war. Canada cannot either. We spend more money in a year on polishing our battleships, than they do on their entire military program. We sure do like shiney battleships. :P I say attack them both, then keep the entire continent to ourselves... >=D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holy Babylon Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 this is why the US is trying to contain communism (since they've surrounded China with capitalist countries and/or with US troops stationed on them: Japan' date=' Okinawa, South Korea, Taiwan, etc)[/quote']Okinawa is a place in Japan. Anywho, that would be awsome if we attacked Mexico and took it over. Free Tacos! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 I meant in that they're trying to contain China's communism Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freeman The Master Posted November 29, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 this is why the US is trying to contain communism (since they've surrounded China with capitalist countries and/or with US troops stationed on them: Japan' date=' Okinawa, South Korea, Taiwan, etc)[/quote']Okinawa is a place in Japan. Anywho, that would be awsome if we attacked Mexico and took it over. Free Tacos!ya just don't drink the water... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 oh yeah. You'll die from the poisoning if you do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luna Diviner Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 Like Bloodrun said, a lot can happen in 3 years.Communism is based on equality and a classless society. The society that communism speaks of does will not requir government. Capitalism on the other hand needs a government, and is driven my profit and all goods requir money. So if people found away to make their own food and goods, capitalism would crumble. For some reason, Communism doesn't seem that bad to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freeman The Master Posted November 29, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 Like Bloodrun said' date=' a lot can happen in 3 years.Communism is based on equality and a classless society. The society that communism speaks of does will not requir government. Capitalism on the other hand needs a government, and is driven my profit and all goods requir money. So if people found away to make their own food and goods, capitalism would crumble. For some reason, Communism doesn't seem that bad to me.[/quote']well its not sapost to be bad, but like every single government in the world it gets corrupted. i my self am pro Confederate.(not the CSA pro just gov pro.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 29, 2008 Report Share Posted November 29, 2008 not to mention every one of them thinks they're right, and there in goes the conflicts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted November 30, 2008 Report Share Posted November 30, 2008 Communism is simply the final stage of a nation that follows the Marxist philosophy. China is not Communist. China follows the Marxist philosophy, but it has not reached the final stage. Marxism supports the creation of an all-powerful government to "teach" the citizens of a country how to become beneficial members of society. Then the government is to dissolve, since it is no longer needed, and the people live on happily ever after, training children as they are born. It doesn't work out that way. No government has managed to reach the final stage because no dictator of a country has been an honest enough man to relinquish all of his power and become just another citizen. Marxism is great, it just depended on humans being incorruptible, when we're not. I'd also just like to mention that the only reason our troops are coming home is that Barrack is coming into the presidency. Under McCain, we would have been there a lot longer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 30, 2008 Report Share Posted November 30, 2008 how much longer if under McCain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark One Posted November 30, 2008 Report Share Posted November 30, 2008 Who knows? He actually once said that he'd carry the war on for another 100 years if he had t. Now, this was obviously figurative speech, considering that he'd A: no longer be president and B: be dead. Still, the comment was meant to support his view that no timetable should be created. This is that timetable Barrack wanted. It's not that McCain's some nutjob or anything the way some people portray him, he's just not proactive the way Obama is. He's not as good at getting things done. Aside from that, Palin is even dumber than Bush, and that's a pretty hard thing to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted November 30, 2008 Report Share Posted November 30, 2008 if McClain wanted to keep fighting until he's 100% sure there'd be no threat from Iraq we could wait for hell to freeze over and it wouldn't happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JesusofChaos™ Posted November 30, 2008 Report Share Posted November 30, 2008 More oil for the oil pump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.