Jump to content

"Flawless" and "Perfect" cards. Feedback please!


James Hitchen

Recommended Posts

In making these cards, I wanted to make a monster with the highest original attack that there's ever been, but not make it overpowered. I hope I accomplished that here. More explanations lower down. The images on these cards have been shamefully ripped from google, and are the properties of their respective owners.

 

103239zc3.jpg

 

103239ku3.jpg

 

In making this last one, I thought about the situation I would have been in during a duel if "Flawless" had been destroyed. The person who did it would have to be really good, but then again he wasn't good enough to stop me from summoning it. So I thought this card's special ability would be a nice compromise; neither of us deserve to win. By the way, it's only a one star monster because I wanted to make it useless for Ritual and Synchro summonings so it only really has one purpose.

 

103239ik4.jpg

 

Ok, feedback please. Any and all appreciated!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nice pics' date='atk and def overpowered they can be at 3000

[/quote']

 

You see, that's where I think I've balanced it. Three of the 2000+ Monsters give it its attack, one means it can't be destroyed in battle and the remaining one means it can't be destroyed by card effects. Although it cannot be destroyed it has weaknesses. 0 DEF means you can switch it into defense mode by a card effect, then you can get a piercing monster and deal some damage. Also, if it's effect is negated by skill drain, rainbow veil or dark neos it's in trouble. It can also be removed by soul exchange of grand mole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like them, they're a bit weird but there nice. I really like the name Flawless victory (it suits my style). No matter what you think though you haven't balanced them. 5 monsters with 2000, or more ATK does not compare to something with 6000 ATK that can't be destroyed. Admittadly it can be returned to the owners hand very easily but still OP. You should try and keep cards at 5000 max.

 

Pics could be better especially the third.

 

OCG Errors:

When the word monster isn't followed by card it does not need a capital letter.

 

"In your field" should be "on your side of the field.

 

"Defense position" needs to be "Defense Position".

 

Your "summoned", I think:?, need to have a capital letter.

 

Also is draw written like that? I don't know that's why I'm asking.

 

Very good cards for an early on user but try not to take this card making business so seiriously. You don't need to Philosiphise why you want to make the cards.I shall give 9/10:D Good job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like them' date=' they're a bit weird but there nice. I really like the name Flawless victory (it suits my style).

 

Pics could be better especially the third.

 

OCG Errors:

When the word monster isn't followed by card it does not need a capital letter.

 

"In your field" should be "on your side of the field.

 

"Defense position" needs to be "Defense Position".

 

Your "summoned", I think:?, need to have a capital letter.

 

Also is draw written like that? I don't know that's why I'm asking.

 

Very good cards for an early on user but try not to take this card making business so seiriously. You don't need to Philosiphise why you want to make the cards.I shall give 9/10:D Good job.

[/quote']

 

Cheers for the props. I do agree with most of the stuff. And it is supposed to be written "DRAW", it does the same thing on the text for the card "Last Turn". I know it shouldn't be a philosophy lesson, but I can't help it, I'm like that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the concept. While I don't agree with keeping Flawless unable to be destroyed by card effects, (as opposed to having be immune to targets, etc.) it's not so bad, because stuff like Karma Cut or (Neo Spacian Grand) Mole can still handle it well.

 

Still, 6000 does seem rather high. You might be better off with 5K, just because you're not breaking any precedents, and only a handful of monsters could ever get that strong anyway. Plus, at the rate this card comes out, you'd be fine anyway.

 

Moving away from all that, love the picture for Flawless, and I thought Perfect's picture matched its effect nicely. I would say that these are some good cards...8/10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wow i really like "Perfect"!! :P

make perfect like this this:

 

ATK/0 DEF/ 0 - 3000 Level 7-10

This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card cannot be Special Summoned except by the effect of "Flawless Victory". This card cannot be Destroyed by Battle. As long as this card remains face-up on the field, you can only conduct your End Phase. During each of your End Phases, put 1 "Perfect" counter on this card (max. 3). When there are 3 "Perfect" counters on this card, both players life points become 0. This cards effect cannot be negated.

 

 

I changed the end bit to life points=0 to end the discussion of should it be Draw or DRAW.

atk and def are way OP

9/10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe u balanced the cards out adequately, a lot of ppl just look at the ATK and DEF and say "ooooh, its over 3000, its overpowered". The effects balance it out perfectly, because to get flawless onto the field would be a great accomplishment, and to allow that to happen would just be suicidal, unless you can use a trap like trap hole to kill it on its first go :) then the duel ends in a draw...sry I dont agree with that. I believe that at your 3rd end phase the card should be destroyed, with a follow-up effect. ending in a draw seems a bit stupid, cause nearly every duel would end that way. You could decide, "hey, I think I'll end the duel now", get flawless killed, summon perfect and wham, you've got a duel in a draw.

 

And yes I know I said right at the beginning everything was good. I read the effects over again and saw the big difference there ^_^ whoopsie me.

 

4.5/5 nice cards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...