Altαir Posted December 13, 2008 Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 This card is a great card. It's defense powers make it great for any protection. It could be used in any deck. SephirothKirby helped me with the effect. I got the picture from-http://media.photobucket.com/image/dragon%20shield/Blanks_2007/Dragon%20Tubes/Shield.png?o=6 This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card cannot be Special Summoned except by discarding 2 cards from your hand. With this monster is Special Summoned, place 10 Magnet Counters on it. This card cannot be in Attack Position. When a monster you control is targeted by an attack, by removing 1 Magnet Counter on this card, you can switch the target to this card, and during Damage Calculation only, this card gains DEF equal to half of the attacking monster's ATK, and half of the previously targeted monster's DEF (face-down monsters count as 0).If this card is selected as an attack target, you may discard one card from your hand to switch the target to another card on your field. This card's first effect cannot be activated during the turn this effect is activated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Death Bishop Posted December 13, 2008 Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 8.6/10 WOW! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Altαir Posted December 13, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 Yeah, I was thinking about making a card that would help on defence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SephirothKirby Posted December 13, 2008 Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card cannot be Special Summoned except by discarding 2 cards from your hand. With this monster is Special Summoned, place 10 Magnet Counters on it. This card cannot be in Attack Position. When a monster you control is targeted by an attack, by removing 1 Magnet Counter on this card, you can switch the target to this card, and during Damage Calculation only, this card gains DEF equal to half of the attacking monster's ATK, and half of the previously targeted monster's DEF (face-down monsters count as 0). Should be better. I'm not too keen on it, but it isn't bad. Just some grammar problems. Of course, you don't have to use the Counters idea, but it makes a lot more sense. EDIT: It should have 0 DEF, because it's DEF isn't defined when it hits the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Altαir Posted December 13, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 Your effect is much better than mine. The counter effect seemes much better so Ill use that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Altαir Posted December 13, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Professor Cobra Posted December 13, 2008 Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 When this card, okay pic, is selected as an attack target, attack target, of the original attack target until the end of the turn. 7/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blitzkrieg98 Posted December 13, 2008 Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 Hm... A defensive card... Ratings: Grammar - 9.25/10 (I haven't seen the grammar used for this card before, but it seems SephirothKirby helped out. The effect grammar is very similar to real card effects.)---Exception: Type in Contrast to Image (The only thing that bugs me is its type. Beast? Surely I can see snakes and a two-headed falcon, but those only look like they are part of the shield. The TCG and OCG card, "Millenium Shield" is a Warrior-Type. Even though it isn't a warrior per se, it looks like an item a warrior could use.)Effect - 8.0/10 (An interesting effect helps this card become a defensive powerhouse. However, there are glaring contradictions. What if "Magnet Shield" was attacked instead of another monster? There is no effect that prevents "Magnet Shield" being targeted by itself. Its effect would not activate at a truly opportune time or might not be activated at all. A 1900 ATK monster could target it and "Magnet Shield" would only gain 950 DEF and would easily be disposed of, never to be Special Summoned again by other means. Also, 10 Magnet Counters seems to be a little much, though this could probably be a personal qualm. If the card were on the field alone, it would only give you Field AND Hand disadvantage.) Overall - 8.0/10. A little revision could be necessary but needless to say, this could definitely be a good card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Altαir Posted December 13, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 13, 2008 Hm... A defensive card... Ratings: Grammar - 9.25/10 (I haven't seen the grammar used for this card before' date=' but it seems SephirothKirby helped out. The effect grammar is very similar to real card effects.)---Exception: Type in Contrast to Image (The only thing that bugs me is its type. Beast? Surely I can see snakes and a two-headed falcon, but those only look like they are part of the shield. The TCG and OCG card, "Millenium Shield" is a Warrior-Type. Even though it isn't a warrior per se, it looks like an item a warrior could use.)Effect - 8.0/10 (An interesting effect helps this card become a defensive powerhouse. However, there are glaring contradictions. What if "Magnet Shield" was attacked instead of another monster? There is no effect that prevents "Magnet Shield" being targeted by itself. Its effect would not activate at a truly opportune time or might not be activated at all. A 1900 ATK monster could target it and "Magnet Shield" would only gain 950 DEF and would easily be disposed of, never to be Special Summoned again by other means. Also, 10 Magnet Counters seems to be a little much, though this could probably be a personal qualm. If the card were on the field alone, it would only give you Field AND Hand disadvantage.) Overall - 8.0/10. A little revision could be necessary but needless to say, this could definitely be a good card.[/quote'] I guess you could be correct for the type, I wouldn't like it if it was Beast either, but I couldn't think of anything else, so Warrior would sound better. For the effect, I thought that if it could protect against most things it would be OPed but I guess not.But don't forget, their are many cards out there that can stop attacks. For the 10 magnet counters, this card would be useless if the effect was gone, so I was thinking if it could stay on longer (but not too long) it would cover for the ATK and usebility of the card.UPDATED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
╬「Selatcia」╬ Posted December 14, 2008 Report Share Posted December 14, 2008 This card cannot be Normal Summoned or Set. This card cannot be Special Summoned except by discarding 2 cards from your hand. When this monster is Special Summoned' date=' place 10 Magnet Counters on it (max [b'][insert number here][/b]). This card cannot be in Attack Position. When a monster you control is selected as an attack target, by removing 1 Magnet Counter from this card, you can switch the target to this card ,and, during Damage Calculation only, this card gains DEF equal to half of the attacking monster's ATK, and half of the previously targeted monster's DEF (face-down monsters count as 0). Fixed.___________________________________________________________ Pic could use a better background. 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Harper Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 Not a bad card,but i've already made a card with that name so can you change the name please?,if you want to Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wuu. Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 Not a bad card' date='but i've already made a card with that name so can you change the name please?,if you want to[/quote'] Lol, you're a noob jake Harper Everything has been said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disse Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 I don't know why but I don't like the effect at all. 4/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.