LiAM Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 [align=center]Yes im deadly serious! [spoiler=[b]Card Effect[/b]]This card cannot be Special Summoned. This card can only be Normal Summoned by tributing 3 monsters you control. For each card in your and your opponents hand this card loses 1500 ATK. When this card becomes the target of a Spell or Trap card, you can decrease this cards ATK by 2500 to negate the effect of the card and destroy it. If your opponent controls no monsters, this card cannot attack your opponent directly. When this card successfully destroys an opponent's monster by battle, decrease this cards ATK by 1000. .. Rate/ Hate/ Comment..[/align][align=right]Image Credit: 'Magic the Gathering' [/align]Thanks ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiGGDaGG Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 At first sight I was like "Wtf!? So OP'd??" Then I saw the effect - the card's negative effect eats up all the good thing... When you and your opponent have total of 6 cards, this monster has 0 ATK.Isn't this little UP'd, considering that you can't Special Summon this monster and you have to tribute 3 monsters at first?But the thought is pretty good ;) 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mysty Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 I do notice some things you can edit in the card text. Here is how I would write the text: This card cannot be Special Summoned. This card can only be Normal Summoned or Set by Tributing 3 monsters. Decrease this card's ATK by the number of cards in each player's hand times 1500. You can decrease this card's ATK by 2500 to negate the effect of a Spell or Trap that targets this card and destroy the card. This card cannot attack your opponent directly. When this card destroys an opponent's monster by battle, decrease this card's ATK by 1000. Anyway, it doesn't seem overpowered. It may deal a lot of damage, but it NEEDS either Skill Drain or Final Attack Orders to work well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Gideon. Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 It is well balanced, I liked it, although I would never use it if it was real ^^ Good job dude 9/10keep up the good work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jace Beleren Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 nice idea 7/10but i dont like the pic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted December 27, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 At first sight I was like "Wtf!? So OP'd??" Then I saw the effect - the card's negative effect eats up all the good thing... When you and your opponent have total of 6 cards' date=' this monster has 0 ATK.Isn't this little UP'd, considering that you can't Special Summon this monster and you have to tribute 3 monsters at first?But the thought is pretty good ;) 8/10[/quote'] yh but usually if ure dueling a good opponentm, they will put most their cards down, so they might like 0 or 3, i usually dont have any cards in my hand in a duel, cos i use them all.thanks for all your positive feedback ;) i just wanted to make somehting that looked soooo OP, and fool you all to prove i am a pro-card maker :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atomix Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 I say it's overpowered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted December 27, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 ok, say your opponent has 2 cards in their hand. it loses 3000 ATK (2x1500ATK) [6000ATK] thne you also negate an effect (-2500ATK) [3500ATK] then it destroys a monster on the field (-1000ATK) [2500ATK] also, your opponent could even have 5 cards, so its attack would be liek 1500. but the tribute cost of 3 monsters is still alot, plus this CANNOT attack directly, even if it had 5000ATK. it HAS to destroy a monster, therefore always losing ATK throughout the Duel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 I say it's overpowered. WTF!? How the hell can this be Overpowered!? Anyways, nice card, I would prob use it if it were real. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted December 27, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 so would i :lol: im gunna send it to Konami ;) (can you do that?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiGGDaGG Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 I say it's overpowered.I hate when you people do that: Owerpowered [PERIOD!]Wtf? Why can't you explain what is wrong then? Make suggestions, what should be done to make card balanced... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JG. Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 Yeah, I've once sent a card idea to them. Yes, I'm serious! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enrise Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 I say it's overpowered. Wow, Atomix pwned you... Anyway, at first overpowered, but as the duel progresses, it will become totally overunderpowered, at which your opponent might take advantage of that, and destroy you once and for all, except with the help of some other cards of course... Pic: Alright, not bad to be in factEffect: Almost balance.. Spotted a few errors, but someone fixed, so I feel no need to re-post the re-fixOriginality: Not seeing too many EARTH Machines around here, great job... ~The Enrise of Darkness Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted December 27, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 ok' date=' say your opponent has 2 cards in their hand. it loses 3000 ATK (2x1500ATK) [6000ATK'] thne you also negate an effect (-2500ATK) [3500ATK] then it destroys a monster on the field (-1000ATK) [2500ATK] also, your opponent could even have 5 cards, so its attack would be liek 1500. but the tribute cost of 3 monsters is still alot, plus this CANNOT attack directly, even if it had 5000ATK. it HAS to destroy a monster, therefore always losing ATK throughout the Duel. read that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaca Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 The effect is negative which balances the card but still 9000 ATK isn't realistic. You have some grammer problems too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted December 27, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 theres isnt many OCG problems, and its nothing major to mae it in-understandable :? but why isnt 9000 ATK realistic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enrise Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 theres isnt many OCG problems' date=' and its nothing major to mae it in-understandable :? but why isnt 9000 ATK realistic?[/quote'] Because there is no card with 9K ATK power, with the exception of Equips, but that doesn't count... Also, 9K ATK power is auto overpowered, so also, your opponent will use every attempt to make your monster weak, which is actually easy to do... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted December 27, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 exactly, plus its very susceptable to trap hole or bottomless trap hole Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alordzynix Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 At first it looks balanced but with some combos you can gain HUGE advantage.1. - Skill Drain. Easy to see you get a 9000 ATK monster with no limites making it to strong.2. - For being a Machine you can use Limiter Removal on it.3. - I'm not sure about this one but it is a Normal Summon so you should also be able to use Trojan Horse on it. Maybe very balanced on its one but not with some combos. Also not very realistic for the fact that the strongest monster only has 5000 ATK and is more difficult to summon. 6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiAM Posted December 27, 2008 Author Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 well, these arent real i wanted to push the boundrys YAY FOR THINKING OUTSIDE THE BOX! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hobbes96 Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 Iy looks like it would have about 100ATK in 2 turns.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brendano Harns Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 This card cannot be Special Summoned. This card can only be Normal Summoned by tributing 3 monsters you control. For each card in your and your opponents hand this card loses 1000 ATK. When this card becomes the target of a Spell or Trap card, you can decrease this card's ATK by 2000 to negate the effect of the card and destroy it. This card cannot declare a direct attack. When this card successfully destroys an opponent's monster by battle, decrease this cards ATK by 500. There is some OCG sorted, and I powered it up slightly to be a powerful card, but still balanced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
∮.Ғσяgσттeи.SσℓÐιєя.∮ Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 this is almost copying demented's thread ;) and, you should have made the ATK OVER 9000!but.still...very balanced...pic is ok... 9.6/10 :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fireball_dragon Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 this is a pretty good card and you can only use it 2 your advantage with a final attack order or skill drain like said before OR you could give some trample effect somehow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sup10111 Posted December 27, 2008 Report Share Posted December 27, 2008 wow i thought wtf 9000 atk?! then i realized what the effect wuz. nice card 9.3/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.