JesusofChaos™ Posted January 8, 2009 Report Share Posted January 8, 2009 http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zORv8wwiadQ Prove me him wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted January 8, 2009 Report Share Posted January 8, 2009 To say it's a 50/50 choice between global climate change being true or false and both sides being plausible is illogical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Death Metal Posted January 8, 2009 Report Share Posted January 8, 2009 I was too destracted by the mountain dew cans in the background to accually watch the vid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted January 8, 2009 Report Share Posted January 8, 2009 I can't watch the video =P Content? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted January 8, 2009 Report Share Posted January 8, 2009 I can't watch the video =P Content? Guy divides global climate change into a 2x2 grid. If global climate change is true or false.If we take action or not. If we take action and GCC isn't true, we pissed away over 9000 dollars for nothing, and worst case scenario, huge world depression because of it.If we don't take action and GCC isn't true. well we're all better off.If we take action and GCC is true, we still paid the money but it was for a good cause.If we don't take action and GCC is true, it's the end of the world as we know it. Conclusion is that we should do out best to make sure that "the end of the world" isn't even an option for our future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyber Altair Posted January 8, 2009 Report Share Posted January 8, 2009 Basically the chances of us taking a right choice is 50/50 =/ I kinda agree with his point but I must admit that's a pretty cool presentation =P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 8, 2009 Report Share Posted January 8, 2009 I can't watch the video =P Content? Guy divides global climate change into a 2x2 grid. If global climate change is true or false.If we take action or not. If we take action and GCC isn't true' date=' we pissed away over 9000 dollars for nothing, and worst case scenario, huge world depression because of it.If we don't take action and GCC isn't true. well we're all better off.If we take action and GCC is true, we still paid the money but it was for a good cause.If we don't take action and GCC is true, it's the end of the world as we know it. Conclusion is that we should do out best to make sure that "the end of the world" isn't even an option for our future.[/quote'] Interesting vid, and I'd have to agree with his point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marisa Kirisame-ze Posted January 9, 2009 Report Share Posted January 9, 2009 Yes, the climate will effect us all, either hot or cold, snowing or a heat wave, we will have to act no matter what. Maybe we should prevent this before its an exposer we all will regret, but seeing as though no one cares for the world's changing, we might be all at stake. Take action now. The Crimson One,Miranda-chan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 9, 2009 Report Share Posted January 9, 2009 People care, just not enough to make a difference. The vast majority aren't going to take action until they see a rapid climate change (like within seconds of extreme heat to extreme cold) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrometheusMFD Posted January 9, 2009 Report Share Posted January 9, 2009 Tempurature increase + increase in CO2 = More Plants = More O2 = More Animals (including humans) = Global Warming is good for life Plus if you take into account that the Northern Ice Cap is already displasing water equal to its total mass, and that the Southern Ice Cap literally defrosts every (3 week) Summer, then there would be no major flooding. Tempurature Decrease + Decrease in CO2 = Less Plants = Less O2 = Less Animals (including humans) = No Global Warming is not good for life, and may infact be detrimental -but- CO2 + Atmosphere =/= tempurature increaseMethane + Atmosphere =/= tempurature increaseWater Vapor + Atmosphere = Tempurature increase Al Gore's theory1 degree increase on the equator = 12 degree increase on the poles(first of all, this makes no sense because heat displaces as that air is carried North)Both Poles average 60- degrees below 0Average Temp on equater varies between 1-3 degrees, and that average has been dropping in the past 10 years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akira Posted January 9, 2009 Report Share Posted January 9, 2009 [/b]over 9000 dollars OH NOES!!! Urm, $9000million, perhaps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pikachu Posted January 9, 2009 Report Share Posted January 9, 2009 [/b]over 9000 dollars OH NOES!!! Urm' date=' $9000million, perhaps?[/quote'] YOU DID THE BOLD BACKWARDS!!! $9000 million = 9 billion = Tiny part of Bill gatesYou mean, 900 billion at least or some countries? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willieh Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 Global warming isn't a serious problem. The worst that could happen is we all die. And if we're all dead; problem solved. People really don't think things through. Rather than trying to prevent our deaths massively (which is inevitable eventually anyway) why not just enjoy our lives while we have them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 Global warming isn't a serious problem. The worst that could happen is we all die. And if we're all dead; problem solved. People really don't think things through. Rather than trying to prevent our deaths massively (which is inevitable eventually anyway) why not just enjoy our lives while we have them? For us problem will be solved when we're all dead. What about the species that comes after us? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willieh Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 Global warming isn't a serious problem. The worst that could happen is we all die. And if we're all dead; problem solved. People really don't think things through. Rather than trying to prevent our deaths massively (which is inevitable eventually anyway) why not just enjoy our lives while we have them? For us problem will be solved when we're all dead. What about the species that comes after us? There won't be a species after us. Global warming would kill every form of life other than microscopic life forms that could maybe live through it. Not to mention that these microscopic life forms wouldn't be able to create new multi-celled organisms. Basically Earth would become like Mars. With the exception of water being here. :| And even if everything except for us lived through the global warming it wouldn't be our concern because the animals left over wouldn't be aware of what was happening to them. And, assuming we're all dead, we wouldn't be guilty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arekku_Koro Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 No, we do not have to act on things that are not real. If you think we should have to act on things that are not real, allow me to introduce you to my new non-profit organization: DEFCODYO The Dolphin Education For Crippled or Dyslexic Youths Organization. We teach crippled and/or dyslexic kids about dolphins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 Global warming isn't a serious problem. The worst that could happen is we all die. And if we're all dead; problem solved. People really don't think things through. Rather than trying to prevent our deaths massively (which is inevitable eventually anyway) why not just enjoy our lives while we have them? For us problem will be solved when we're all dead. What about the species that comes after us? There won't be a species after us. Global warming would kill every form of life other than microscopic life forms that could maybe live through it. Not to mention that these microscopic life forms wouldn't be able to create new multi-celled organisms. Basically Earth would become like Mars. With the exception of water being here. :| And even if everything except for us lived through the global warming it wouldn't be our concern because the animals left over wouldn't be aware of what was happening to them. And' date=' assuming we're all dead, we wouldn't be guilty.[/quote'] Yeah but we don't know enough on evolution to know how entire species develop yet. Maybe there won't be a species after us who are more heat resistant, but maybe there will be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willieh Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 Global warming isn't a serious problem. The worst that could happen is we all die. And if we're all dead; problem solved. People really don't think things through. Rather than trying to prevent our deaths massively (which is inevitable eventually anyway) why not just enjoy our lives while we have them? For us problem will be solved when we're all dead. What about the species that comes after us? There won't be a species after us. Global warming would kill every form of life other than microscopic life forms that could maybe live through it. Not to mention that these microscopic life forms wouldn't be able to create new multi-celled organisms. Basically Earth would become like Mars. With the exception of water being here. :| And even if everything except for us lived through the global warming it wouldn't be our concern because the animals left over wouldn't be aware of what was happening to them. And' date=' assuming we're all dead, we wouldn't be guilty.[/quote'] Yeah but we don't know enough on evolution to know how entire species develop yet. Maybe there won't be a species after us who are more heat resistant, but maybe there will be If everything is dead there will be nothing to evolve. -_- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 then how do you explain how life on earth first began? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
End Of The Abyss Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 False and No seems nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willieh Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 then how do you explain how life on earth first began? I can't. You can't. No one can. And to be honest, evolution is a shaky theory. If we all came from the ocean, why did it suddenly just stop when we were spawned from the sea by tiny micro-bacterial organisms? My theory: If nothing has come from the sea as an evolution yet whilst we are existent that wasn't already there; nothing will in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 ok call it what you want, but life had to have begun on this planet somewhere, which means something had to have been created out of nothing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
End Of The Abyss Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 Is that JoC? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willieh Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 ok call it what you want' date=' but life had to have begun on this planet somewhere, which means something had to have been created out of nothing[/quote'] That's the problem with people. They think everything had to start. ITT: The universe has always been here, life has always been in the universe, etc... For all we know, aliens dumped life on the earth when it was first formed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 a possible theory with I don't rule out, but then you'll have to explain how life in the universe began Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.