pooper scooper 3422 Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 pleeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaase rate high. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sast1 Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 i don't know may be its cool like 6/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shiranui Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 OP'd. No vanilla monsters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cloud8339 Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 id say 8/10 i see some errors in spelling though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmegaWave Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 Normal Monsters recieve an instant "D" on my Grading Scale. Normal Monsters serve no purpose now. Atleast in a single set. Give it an effect and then I will rate it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Man0waR Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 0/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitchblack64 Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 3/10 for being normal 4/10 for trying do an effect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadowbreath Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 I like gold cards but it could use a longer lore. For those who say normal cards serve no purpose I don't think any objects to having a blue eyes in a non themed deck. Face it theme decks are kinda gay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morgan LeFlay Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 No offense but I didn't know that it was possible to have OCG errors on a normal monster. Names should be capitalized Types should be capitalized Also, set names are traditionally 3-4 letters long (usually 4 now) and the set numbers are 3 digits or EN + 3 digits. The card itself is okay. Because I don't rate on OCG, 6/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmarian Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 Why he should do effect? There should be normal monsters in game...fact that Konami sucks in making Normal monsters support is not reason to spit on this guy card at all and tell him that he make effect monster instead...when i rate Normal monster i look at card text (story) , name , picture and where that card could be used..i really hope that Konami will make more normal monsters theme that will be more competitive... My rating : Story : 3/10Combo&Usage : 4/10 (It is LIGHT and have 2550 ATK + Lv6..there is no lot of deck where this card would be useful right now)Wording : 5/10 ( 1 sentence and there is few grammar errors)Picture : 3/10 (It doesn't really fit to YGO) Total : 3.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Man0waR Posted January 13, 2009 Report Share Posted January 13, 2009 ^ shut up. Normals around here=N00B with no card making skill. It takes skill to make effects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadowbreath Posted January 14, 2009 Report Share Posted January 14, 2009 Sorry i was kind of blunt yesterday, You should make a the name Light Warrior, its Type Warrior(always caps the begging letter) make it 7 stars. give it a proper card booster and number like ps3-001(pooper scooper 3422) and try to give it at least a paragraph for its info in light of not having an effect it should have a decent lore. and you can keep the picture but it doesn't look a lot like a yugioh card, but in all fairness 90% of the cards up here don't they are just anime pictures taken off google or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.