222DMD Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 [/img] pleae review Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yoshiman™ Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 the effect is pointless, bad pic. UPed. 5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gaelach_buachaill Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 It's a nice card and all, but it's pretty useless on it's own, and I really don't see how it could be a tuner lord, seeing as there are much stronger tuners. And the picture isn't the best. 4/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Force_Flex Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 i would change the pic and change the effect so it had something to do with summoning tuners... its good otherwise... but dont u ussually want to lower your level in the game not make it go up?? ill give it 6/10... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DigiPro Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 the level for this tuner is good already, kinda like the Rose warrior of Revenge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommers2008 Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 oh god no... very bad attempt sorry.. terrible pic,ocg errors... and don't use attachments...... (and yes i no the card is posted as well but still don't post attachments) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DigiPro Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 oh god no... very bad attempt sorry.. terrible pic' date='ocg errors... and don't use attachments...... (and yes i no the card is posted as well but still don't post attachments)[/quote'] dont be so offensive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xing Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 oh god no... very bad attempt sorry.. terrible pic' date='ocg errors... and don't use attachments...... (and yes i no the card is posted as well but still don't post attachments)[/quote'] Agreed with above comment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pitchblack64 Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 different pic but ok idea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommers2008 Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 oh god no... very bad attempt sorry.. terrible pic' date='ocg errors... and don't use attachments...... (and yes i no the card is posted as well but still don't post attachments)[/quote'] dont be so offensive says who.. i will that card is terrible.. i am telling him the truth you will never improve if people tell you it is anything else.. that card is bad its better he no's... and don't comment on my comment, comment on the card... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DigiPro Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 the card is bad yes but dont say it so rudely. ppl wont respect yu for that.btw, change the pic of the card. not very good. 2/5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommers2008 Posted January 26, 2009 Report Share Posted January 26, 2009 the card is bad yes but dont say it so rudely. ppl wont respect yu for that.btw' date=' change the pic of the card. not very good. 2/5[/quote'] its called being honest.. if you don't like that fine.. if people don't respect me for it i don't care either.. oh and mamal567 stop spamming.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanta Posted January 27, 2009 Report Share Posted January 27, 2009 Name and picture are bad. Remove the 'can't be destroyed by battle'. However, the concept of the second effect is very good. Don't get why people are hating on that. Sure the effect has OCG errors, but the concept is very good. Don't listen to them. Yes, you need practice, maybe lots of practice. But it's not an 'oh god no' card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.