Walton Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 Please rate this card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morgan LeFlay Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 2500 DEF is overpowered for a level 4 with no drawback ? ATK needs an effect to tell it what its ATK becomes, and is only 1 question mark OCG errors Its effect is overpowered. Don't like the pic. Keep trying though, in general for a level 4, 1900 is the cap on effect monsters and 2100 as far as defense goes (as long as it has a really low ATK) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EliminateHRN Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 Image credit needed. Image is bad, very, very bad. OCG errors. It should be (I think, someone needs to correct me): "As long as this card is face-up on the field, all destroyed monster's ATK is inflicted to your opponent's Life Points." Effect is overpowered. Sorry, 4.2/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ezio Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 Sorry but I have to agree with the above!- Terrible Image- Terrible OCG- Terrible Effect (Idea is OK)- No Image Credit I would'nt have made it Earth maybe Light or Dark!I'd also change it from Warrior to Spellcaster or even Winged-Beast! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Queen-Dragoon Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 That's not what the effect is supposed to do Avian. Damage is done to the OWNER of the destroyed monster so it isn't too OP. DEF should be 2100 tops. Picture isn't anime enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SushiTheLegend Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 Whoever said this card is overpowered needs to shoot themself. Granted the defense is a little high, however there is a draw back, if your monster is destroyed and you have say Neos you take 2500 damage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Domi the Mystery Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 It is a bit OPed anyway and it has too simple effect!!! Poor pic and OCG so you get an 1/10 from me!SRY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SushiTheLegend Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 It is a bit OPed anyway and it has too simple effect!!! Poor pic and OCG so you get an 1/10 from me!SRYA lot of good effects are simple effects. And please provide OCG fixes or don't bother commenting on OCG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ragnarok1945 Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 far too overpowered of an effect 5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Future L Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 Change to:As long as this card remains face-up, when a monster is destroyed, inflict damage to the owner equal to the ATK of the destroyed monster. Ma'at sounds familiar, like from the GX manga. 8.5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tabris Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 Are you speakin' in English, kid? If so,Icouldn't understand you. Really. Correct the damned OCG,damn it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dark Megacyber Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 Terrible image, OCG...........3/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skyson Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 It's really far from overpowered. The only thing weird about it is that it goes under its own effect and you take no damage from its own destruction (though you wouldn't anyway) so its DEF is very justified. The effect turns the field into a big scale war. An opponent would almost want to keep this on the field to punish you for having big monsters on the field. Though, with this having so much DEF, you could play nothing else and punish your opponent for playing anything. That would be dumb, though, since you'd have to rely on Spells and Traps to assist you. Pretty fun stuff. I like the idea, and I think it was justified as a level 4. Hitting it while in face-down Defense then setting off its effect is like "hi guys, I'm big, time for a fun effect." But you know, a bunch of people telling you one thing always looks better than one person telling you another. 7/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.