guy person Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 That's the point of a Twilight to have DaD and Lightsworns togeth' date=' since you mill yourself it's easier to get DaD out, thus being constitent.[/quote'] Despite the way it sounds, it is a very inconsistent build... Ask anyone, even JD will tell you that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smeg Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 He will tell you it's a good deck type. Guy, why would an "inconsistent" deck be up in the meta? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted February 26, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 Lumina Costs Breaker is free spell bye-byeand is darkish with 19 so HAHAH! Lyla does breakers job. The extra dark is not needed because DAD is not needed' date=' if anything DAD is making the deck less consistent.[/quote'] So what you are trying to say is drop DAD? Dropping it would get the Deck down to 40 as is. DAD isnt entirely bad in here. DARK translates into Chaos Sorcerer food in here. The extra DARK does help. I know Lyla does Breaker's job but with Sorcerer in here, I dont see why I shouldnt use Breaker. Again, the extra DARK helps without interfering with the win conditions. Remember. This is not the same inconsistent Twilight build from the last 2 Formats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smeg Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 Perhaps read our spam Judgement, he thinks it's a bad deck type. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommers2008 Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 its JD's build... anyway.. -1 CotLB+ Brain Control i forgot to give reason..You don't have many options for tuners, control brings that.. i feel 2 CotLB is enough for the build, and control just gives you that greater option.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guy person Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 Lumina Costs Breaker is free spell bye-byeand is darkish with 19 so HAHAH! Lyla does breakers job. The extra dark is not needed because DAD is not needed' date=' if anything DAD is making the deck less consistent.[/quote'] So what you are trying to say is drop DAD? Dropping it would get the Deck down to 40 as is. DAD isnt entirely bad in here. DARK translates into Chaos Sorcerer food in here. The extra DARK does help. I know Lyla does Breaker's job but with Sorcerer in here, I dont see why I shouldnt use Breaker. Again, the extra DARK helps without interfering with the win conditions. Remember. This is not the same inconsistent Twilight build from the last 2 Formats. Extra dark's help to a degree until they start to interfere with the consistency of the deck. While it may not be as inconsistent as the other builds, DAD still interferes with the balance of the deck... So yes, take DAD out, all you need is JD and for the most part DAD will only cause dead draws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smeg Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 Taking in DaD out would be useless thats like going up to a tele-dad and going; - the dads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guy person Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 Perhaps read MY spam Judgement' date=' he thinks it's a bad deck type.[/quote'] Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted February 26, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 That's the point of a Twilight to have DaD and Lightsworns togeth' date=' since you mill yourself it's easier to get DaD out, thus being constitent.[/quote'] Despite the way it sounds, it is a very inconsistent build... Ask anyone, even JD will tell you that. This is not the same inconsistent Twilight build from the last 2 Formats. This is more Lightsworn than DARK and it works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smeg Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 That's the point of a Twilight to have DaD and Lightsworns togeth' date=' since you mill yourself it's easier to get DaD out, thus being constitent.[/quote'] Despite the way it sounds, it is a very inconsistent build... Ask anyone, even JD will tell you that. This is not the same inconsistent Twilight build from the last 2 Formats. This is more Lightsworn than DARK and it works. And there you go.And it was in your spam that it was mentioned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guy person Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 Taking in DaD out would be useless thats like going up to a tele-dad and going; - the dads. Wrong, DADS are consistent in Tele-DAD. In LS if you try too hard to incorporate DAD into the deck, all you will end up with is inconsistency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smeg Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 no you will bleeding not, you know what i'm-a go stop here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted February 26, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 Taking in DaD out would be useless thats like going up to a tele-dad and going; - the dads. Wrong' date=' DADS are consistent in Tele-DAD. In LS if you try too hard to incorporate DAD into the deck, all you will end up with is inconsistency.[/quote'] I dont try too hard to incorporate DAD in here. Yes. Indeed if you do try too hard with DAD in here, you will get an inconsistent result. That was the problem with the older Twilight Builds. They tried too hard to incorporate DAD and JD. And this Deck is very consistent. I dont see it dieing any time soon. Unless of course this gets the same emergency ban treatment DAD Return got in May. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guy person Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 That's the point of a Twilight to have DaD and Lightsworns togeth' date=' since you mill yourself it's easier to get DaD out, thus being constitent.[/quote'] Despite the way it sounds, it is a very inconsistent build... Ask anyone, even JD will tell you that. This is not the same inconsistent Twilight build from the last 2 Formats. This is more Lightsworn than DARK and it works. Make it less dark and it will work better... All you need is JD so why throw in dad and get in the way of JD's summoning condition by adding tons of darks and taking away from the LS?All I'm saying is that the DAD and a few darks need to go, they aren't needed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smeg Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 less dark will make it more inconsistent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted February 26, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 less dark will make it more inconsistent. One less DARK will not make much if any difference. So far in testing this build, I have had no consistency issues. Now, the version I tested before this was not as consistent as this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smeg Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 less dark will make it more inconsistent. One less DARK will not make much if any difference. So far in testing this build' date=' I have had no consistency issues. Now, the version I tested before this was not as consistent as this.[/quote'] I meant multiple darks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted February 26, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 [spoiler=Older version of this in case anyone is wondering what I am talking about]Extra Deck: 15 Same as this topic's Monsters: 22 2x Judgment Dragon1x Chaos Sorcerer2x Celestia, Lightsworn Angel3x Honest3x Wulf, Lightsworn Beast2x Lyla, Lightsworn Sorceress2x Lumina, Lightsworn Summoner1x Garoth, Lightsworn Warrior1x Jain, Lightsworn Paladin3x Necro Gardna1x Breaker the Magical Warrior1x Plaguespreader Zombie Spells: 13 3x Solar Recharge3x Charge of the Light Brigade2x Foolish Burial2x Monster Reincarnation1x Monster Reborn1x Heavy Storm1x Giant Trunade Traps: 6 1x Torrential Tribute2x Beckoning Light3x Threatening Roar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smeg Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 [spoiler=Older version of this in case anyone is wondering what I am talking about]Extra Deck: 15 Same as this topic's Monsters: 22 2x Judgment Dragon1x Chaos Sorcerer2x Celestia' date=' Lightsworn Angel3x Honest3x Wulf, Lightsworn Beast2x Lyla, Lightsworn Sorceress2x Lumina, Lightsworn Summoner1x Garoth, Lightsworn Warrior1x Jain, Lightsworn Paladin3x Necro Gardna1x Breaker the Magical Warrior1x Plaguespreader Zombie Spells: 13 3x Solar Recharge3x Charge of the Light Brigade2x Foolish Burial2x Monster Reincarnation1x Monster Reborn1x Heavy Storm1x Giant Trunade Traps: 6 1x Torrential Tribute2x Beckoning Light3x Threatening Roar [/quote'] Wheres the DaD, that doesn't really make it twilight, but your right this build smashes that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chevalier Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 That's the point of a Twilight to have DaD and Lightsworns togeth' date=' since you mill yourself it's easier to get DaD out, thus being constitent.[/quote']He will tell you it's a good deck type. Guy' date=' why would an "inconsistent" deck be up in the meta?[/quote'] I've had enough of these comments. The best LS build is the one that doesn't run DAD. Refrain from acting like you have an idea what you're talking about, I find it very annoying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guy person Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 That's the point of a Twilight to have DaD and Lightsworns togeth' date=' since you mill yourself it's easier to get DaD out, thus being constitent.[/quote']He will tell you it's a good deck type. Guy' date=' why would an "inconsistent" deck be up in the meta?[/quote'] I've had enough of these comments. The best LS build is the one that doesn't run DAD. Refrain from acting like you have an idea what you're talking about, I find it very annoying. About time i got some support... -_- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chevalier Posted February 26, 2009 Report Share Posted February 26, 2009 Monsters:253 Celestia2 Garoth1 Chaos Sorcerer1 Plague1 Ehren3 Necro3 Lumina2 Lyla2 JD2 Ryko2 Wulf3 Honest Spells:131 brain1 reborn1 mst1 heavy3 cold wave3 charge3 solar traps:32 beckoning1 ccv Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted February 27, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 27, 2009 Why cant my other topics get this many Posts? Anyway an Edit. Dropped DAD. Didnt make much if any difference being in here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chevalier Posted February 27, 2009 Report Share Posted February 27, 2009 Dropped DAD Excellent.As said first page-Breaker +Lum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommers2008 Posted February 27, 2009 Report Share Posted February 27, 2009 this is steadily becoming plain LS build... especially if you drop breaker for another lumina.. again i feel -1 CotLB+1 Brain Control Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.