Tronta Posted March 4, 2009 Report Share Posted March 4, 2009 a friend of mine was building this a while ago, and i decided to improve on it yesterday: 2 rainbow dragon2 judgment dragon3 pegasus1 carbuncle1 eagle1 tiger1 mammoth1 kitty1 turtle2 wulf1 ryko3 lumina2 lyla2 jain3 honests26 3 charge3 recharge2 foolish1 reborn1 heavy1 trunade1 mst12 2 crystal pair2 deck 40. the win condition is either judgment or rainbow, and this deck is designed to throw their supplies in the grave quite quickly, while taking advantage of their supports.im not sure about the numbering on the lightsworns, i dont usually run them. also, i was considering reincarnations. rate/fix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smeg Posted March 5, 2009 Report Share Posted March 5, 2009 One of each crystal cept peggy, and your running 2 rainbows? Risky Here is my shot Monsters: 221x Rainbow Dragon3x Saphire Pegasus12x Rest of Crystals (2 for each)2x Jain2x Lyla1x Lumina1x Magical Merchant Spells: 151x Monster Reborn1x Heavy Storm1x Mystical Space Typhoon2x Solar Recharge2x Foolish Burial2x Crystal Abundance3x Rare Value3x Ancient City - Rainbow Ruins Traps: 32x Rainbow Gravity1x Crystal Raigeki Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted March 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 6, 2009 the others are useless. the win condition is either judgment or rainbow, possibly both, and the goal is to get them out of the deck as fast as humanly possible. adding more of anyone but peggy slows it down too much. whyd you take out the lightsworn counterpart?thats retarded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smeg Posted March 6, 2009 Report Share Posted March 6, 2009 the others are useless. the win condition is either judgment or rainbow' date=' possibly both, and the goal is to get them out of the deck as fast as humanly possible. adding more of anyone but peggy slows it down too much. whyd you take out the lightsworn counterpart?thats retarded.[/quote'] Because having judgement and rainbow slows it way to much.Specially 2 of eachand having 2 of each crystal is good and easy for the rainbow. -1 Rainbow Dragon+1 Rainbow Gravity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted March 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 6, 2009 well judgment is clearly better and easier than rainbow, so why run cbs at all? field control is useless against the new age of mt destruction. where it used to be just breaker, now we stare down lyla and best.4 nomis in the deck wont slow it down. most decks run 2 or 3 nomis, and maybe more semi-nomis. especially not when their summon condition is made all the easier by freaking lightsworns everywhere.furthermore, with that much milling, odds are i might not draw any of em, in which case im relying on my pure swarm power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted March 6, 2009 Report Share Posted March 6, 2009 Once again someone takes my idea and builds it poorly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted March 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 6, 2009 i took this idea from my friend, who not only came up with it by himself, but made it badly.i looked at your build. it sucks.you tilt the whole deck toward rainbow for some reason. hes not a good win condition alone. hell, lightsworns without judgment are better than a deck trying to get out rainbow. who the hell even are you that you thought i would take your build? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted March 6, 2009 Report Share Posted March 6, 2009 i took this idea from my friend' date=' who not only came up with it by himself, but made it badly.i looked at your build. it sucks.you tilt the whole deck toward rainbow for some reason. hes not a good win condition alone. hell, lightsworns without judgment are better than a deck trying to get out rainbow. who the hell even are you that you thought i would take your build?[/quote'] First of all, I was mistaken. I didn't realize you were building the build in an attempt to work with Judgment Dragon and Rainbow Dragon. Second of all, mine is for Casual Play, whereas yours is a mixture of two win conditions that would most likely not end up working. Third of all, regardless of how bad mine is, yours isn't good either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted March 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 6, 2009 well i disagree on the matter of it not working. they both have a common goal, and the cards in the deck work toward that goal. everything mills, and one of the dragons hopefully will hit the field. my variant simply offers an alternate to the rainbow, whos effect may as well say 'this card is treated as an effect monster' for all the second turn-age he gets. im sorry for bashing your deck terribly, that was a bit uncalled for. im not quite understanding your definition of casual play though, is it meant to imply that you wont be facing tough opponents? or that your on a budget? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Star Posted March 6, 2009 Report Share Posted March 6, 2009 well i disagree on the matter of it not working. they both have a common goal' date=' and the cards in the deck work toward that goal. everything mills, and one of the dragons hopefully will hit the field. my variant simply offers an alternate to the rainbow, whos effect may as well say 'this card is treated as an effect monster' for all the second turn-age he gets. im sorry for bashing your deck terribly, that was a bit uncalled for. im not quite understanding your definition of casual play though, is it meant to imply that you wont be facing tough opponents? or that your on a budget?[/quote'] Well, I can make Competitive Decks, and I have, but sometimes I like to make Decks for fun that have the goal of taking a card(s) that aren't used often or aren't very good and trying to win with them. The thing with your Deck that bothers me is the three Honest. Now, I know Honest is good, but isn't this meant to be more of a Turbo Deck? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tronta Posted March 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 6, 2009 given that everything in the deck is light, it would see a shame not to run them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.