Jump to content

LOCK ( 1st CCG Tournament Contest - Finished - Winner : Imadjinn )

Nightmarian

By Nightmarian
in Finished Contests

Recommended Posts

Nightmarian Newbie

Nightmarian

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Well, like i told ^^ , because allposted Fusions/Synchros/Rituals was either bad or they wasn't there, same go with normals , also count judges cards too , all judges cards that made in lowered down that number, so at end is 12 cards left....

I can post them here if needed, but they will be seen anyway, when set will be completed ( and u can have preview if u go in Finish Phase thread, they need to be reworded still )..

 

 

Btw, you really should focus more on balancing your cards, look on all options, because they was broken...you was actually good, because there was much more broken cards then u have posted...like i told, around 80%, maybe even 90% -> overpowered...:(

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply
tommers2008 Newbie

tommers2008

Posted
Posted

Please state how...

 

We need some strong cards in this game as well we can't just depend on basic mish mash decks with no main win strategy...

 

Now i see how you could say some are op'd... express wing fairy is op'd i was gonna change it but didn't bother..

 

Completely no way zerakos is op'd..

 

I don't see how prototype destructor is..

 

Venomiscus is not in my eyes yes it can stop cards outside of draw phase but at cost and averagely bout 500 points damage per turn isn't much..

 

Sicarius is iffy because the adding card to hand thing..

 

Battle cry..?? how??

 

Luminescent could be toned down, but does require a level 5 beast or beast-warrior to be summoned..

 

Cartayhus, could be made a level 10 but i don't see a need..

 

Please specify why you think they are op'd.. If you wish we can take this to pm..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nightmarian Newbie

Nightmarian

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Tommers, idea of this project was to make game where combination of cards win, not 1 card..what u mean by mish mash cards, CCG 0 is full of really strong cards, but not broken ones...broken cards are never good for game...

And it would be better u come to IRC so i will explain which of your cards was broken...i throw look now, they are not all broke obviously, but at end if u notice all cards that was accepted are generic, that means no Type/Attribute support...(there is actually 1 card in current set that mentions Thunder-Types, but it works alone too so its fine)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shadow Zero Newbie

Shadow Zero

Posted
Posted

well. i see that i missed a lot of stuff earlier today. << by the way, i heard mention something about too many rituals, synchro's and fusions or something? im guessing that i might've been part of that with my entries, but im going to be making other cards as well. i dont know that i'll be making normal types though. im more into effect cards. anyway, i was also wondering if my cards might've been classified as overpowered? i think i can see desert warrior zero being a bit much, but i did counter balance dark lord zero with inconvenient side effects. so.....was any of my cards in there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shadow Zero Newbie

Shadow Zero

Posted
Posted

i agree with tommers. and on that point, i havea a suggestion. instead of changing our cards, suggest possible changes or that we change something on them instead of changing them yourself. because then they arent what they were before. the whole point of this is to have cards that are made by the players, for the players. if you change the cards yourself, then then they are no longer the cards that were created bu the ones who made them. in short, we make cards, and then you decide that something isnt right and that they have tpo be changed and take it upon yourself to change them without first giving us the chance to do it ourselves. and in my opinion, thats just wrong. you havea a problem with our cards, you let us know and give uys a chance to post our own modified versions of them instead of channging them yourself and completely destroying the essence of what they are. on that not, here is a modified version of my own cards. you have a problem with them, let me know and i'll make changes. give other people the same courtesy as well.

 

226293.jpg

226293.jpg

this monster can only be summoned by using the ritual spell card flames of darkness. on your turn, you may use one effect. 1: you may choose one monster your opponent controls and add half the original attack of the monster to this card. only one monster can be used in this way and the effect ends when that monster is destroyed. 2: lower dark lord zero's attack by half to attack your opponents life points directly. dark lord zero cannot attack the turn after this effect is ended. 3: by lowering dark lord zero's attack to 1/3 and sacrificing 1000 life points, you may attack up to 10 times. you can attack the same target up to a maximum of 3 times, and dark lord zero cannot attack for te next 2 turns when this efffect is used. use of any effect permanently lowers dark lord zero's attack by 100 points per use, or inflicts 300 life points of damage to the user.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nightmarian Newbie

Nightmarian

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Cards was judged by original versions, not remade versions..It was said in first post, that they will be changed to enter CCG, because they need to be balanced, perfect wording etc...

So i really don't have time to talk about this sorry...when Karl finishes with transforming cards to YVD set we will enter to Set 1 and how it seems, he will be Set 1 leader..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tommers2008 Newbie

tommers2008

Posted
Posted

You don't get what we are saying, i have no worrry's on rewording the cards, its the balancing thats the trouble you make it that in some cards the whole effect is changed to new effect..

 

Let me just give an example this didn't happen or anything but its like this..

 

Just say this "When this card is Special Summoned, destroy 1 face-down card on field"

 

Your version "When this card is Normal Summoned, destroy 1 face-down card your opponent controls."

 

In that its lost the ability to destroy 1 of my cards, and also its effect can't be used in a Special Summon... Totally different effect

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shadow Zero Newbie

Shadow Zero

Posted
Posted

well, i still agree with tommers. and, when there is rebalancing to be done, you give us a chance to do it ourselves first. you can make suggestions and whatever and still decide to change it further if you have to, but if you dont let us do it ourselves first, not only is that overstepping your bounds in my opinion, but you also cheat yourself and everyone else out of seeing and possibly using a much better card then you would have though of, effect wise at least. so let us do it ourselves first. they are our creations after all, so we should reserve the right to make the changes that we see fit without other butting in and doing it for us without giving us a chance to do it ourselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
fortycal86 Newbie

fortycal86

Posted
Posted

I would have to agree with what shadow-zero just said, you brought out a very good point.

 

We should have the right to change them ourselves first. I would change it too, If this card is Summoned from the hand instead. So you cannot use graveyard manipulation. What do you think about that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shadow Zero Newbie

Shadow Zero

Posted
Posted

thanks for the vote of confidence cal. and by the way, i thought that ritual cards couldn't be brought back from the graveyard except by cards like fulfillment of the contract and stuff like that. anyway, i realized a mistake i made with my ritual cards and corrected it. now when i do ritual monster chains, one is removed from the game instead of sent to the graveyard. so then they can only be brought back by something like return from the different dimension. oh, and cal. maybe we could swap card ideas or something? im looking for people to give me their opinions before i post cards in a contest. what do you say?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nightmarian Newbie

Nightmarian

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Because of this, i doubt there will be Promo Phase in Set 1 at all..this is contest, and some of u mistaken that this is something else..next time read the rules, and if u don't like them , then don't go in contest competing...point of Promo Phase is not to enable entering any card, but point is to get cards that CCG miss...

There will be changing by members like it always was, in Final Phase of next Set...this changes was done by judges, and that was written at start it will be this way...this set already did take way too much time, and all is now in YCM format, Karl is transforming those cards to YVD.set, so it is too late..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
fortycal86 Newbie

fortycal86

Posted
Posted

So you don't agree with my changes I guess. It doesn't really matter to me but, you should ask the creator to try and change it first is all I'm saying. I personally like my change better but, the way it is now is fine. I also don't mean to slow the CCG process down. I just wish my internet was working properly, this way I could of had some input at the IRC on my cards changes before everything was finalized, so to speak.

 

 

P.S.

 

Great job on completing the rest of SET0. I really hate not having access to internet at all times.

 

 

P.P.S.

 

I did not see Karls post until now. I'm glad you will discuss it on the IRC, I really appreciate it. Unfortunately I won't be on there to discuss it with you guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Morgan LeFlay Newbie

Morgan LeFlay

Posted
Posted

The big problem here is that we are working with a time frame. Since I'm basically in charge of the YVD sets, and I don't have a lot of time to work on them anyway, asking each member before we make changes to their 100-card set would prove to be very time consuming, since I have to type everything up and constant changes would be a tedious task. Now, if there are any issues we could probably talk about it and it wouldn't be too hard to change later down the road. This is something that me and Nightmarian will need to discuss, but as long as the idea isn't going to overpower or hurt the game then it could probably be done.

 

Also, and this comment is more towards Nightmarian, I'd like to have a copy of the cards myself so I might just do the updated graphics too, and use GIMP to crop the images on my computer for the YVD image set file. This will help greatly especially because I need to maintain the images for YCM format and YVD format on our new website, which I plan on updating soon.

 

Anyway..Those are just my thoughts. If there are any problems with the way things turned out for your cards, just post on the main thread or the thread for the final phase, and we might or might now take a look at them and see what we can do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nightmarian Newbie

Nightmarian

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Karl - if u want, u can make cards in your YCM, i don't think there is way i send u somehow data so that u can use them in your YCM...or u was talking about something else?

 

Fortycal86, or anyone else -> we need someone to make CROPs...that means, go to our Final Phase thread, find post at end of 10th page, where is all 100 cards in YCM format..then save each of those cards to your PC ( right click -> save as image ) , then cut picture that is in middle of card ( u can do this with irfanview, gimp etc..just select part where is middle picture , then for example in irfanview u would u use command crop so u would get that cut picture ) ...

After that u need to resize that picture to 40x40 and save it....when it is all done, they must be uploaded obviously....

 

Btw, we got our site now , but it is under construction.....and we should talk about this in Final Phase thread or main thread, not here...<<; ( this is contest )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...