~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted March 13, 2009 Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 Oh dear god. Emergency ban Machine Duplication. Seriously. This thing, unlike its Chaos counterpart, can inflict Battle Damage. Macro suddenly looks scary. It's really not that situational either, considering that if it scans a beatstick or anything but a Grave-triggered effect like searchers, Malicious, or Sangan, anything but those, and it's a monster you can make use of. Take your pick. Then Machine Duplication... Imagine scanning some generic Synchro, any will do, then Duping. It's terrifying to think about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Requiem Posted March 13, 2009 Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 Ow my heads looks at looking at it. Also my nuts hurt after seeing your sig @_@ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted March 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 Ow my heads looks at looking at it. Also my nuts hurt after seeing your sig @_@ Always glad to help. =P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smeg Posted March 13, 2009 Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 YAY for suicidle, marco, lightsworn! All in one! I call dibs on this card. Abusable card is abusable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted March 13, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 Oh yeah...LS would hate this. Mill JD, then get hit with triple scanned JD. =o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tekken Ham Posted March 13, 2009 Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 Sadly none were pulled at my Sneak. I love this card. Although, CAN it be duped? I'm assuming the answer is yes, but if it can't, that would really suck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted March 13, 2009 Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 ? ≠ 500≥? ≠ 500≥ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valkyrie Lupia Blitzer Posted March 13, 2009 Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 Sadly none were pulled at my Sneak. I love this card. Although' date=' CAN it be duped? I'm assuming the answer is yes, but if it can't, that would really suck.[/quote'] Considering its ATK is ?, then it's a hard question. I'm guessing that we can't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azmodius Posted March 13, 2009 Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 I will run this in Macro Monarchs, with Valleys and Dupe, it's worth it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted March 13, 2009 Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 ? ≠ 500≥? ≠ 500≥ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 13, 2009 Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 ? ≠ 500≥? ≠ 500≥ Except when it does, as in this case. While off the field, this card doesn't need to have any specific amount of ATK, but while on the field, the ATK must be fixed - after all, if your opponent were to attack this face-up Attack Position monster with, say, Celtic Guardian, how would you determine the result if this card had ? ATK rather than 0 ATK? Thus, while this card is face-up on the field and not copying anything, it has 0 ATK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted March 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 Original ATK (or DEF)The Original ATK (or DEF) is the number of ATK (or DEF) pointsprinted on the Monster Card. This does not include an increasefrom an Equip Spell Card or other card effect. If “?” is written as theATK or DEF' date=' the original ATK or DEF is treated as zero.[/quote'] Huge bold lettering is the equivalent of raising your voice, which although might be the next best thing to being right, it often isn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
「tea.leaf」 Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 Original ATK (or DEF)The Original ATK (or DEF) is the number of ATK (or DEF) pointsprinted on the Monster Card. This does not include an increasefrom an Equip Spell Card or other card effect. If “?” is written as theATK or DEF' date=' the original ATK or DEF is treated as zero.[/quote'] Huge bold lettering is the equivalent of raising your voice, which although might be the next best thing to being right, it often isn't. Trying to be clever, smartass? I'm not wrong by any means, just irrelevant: ? is not less than or equal to 500. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted March 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 Original ATK (or DEF)The Original ATK (or DEF) is the number of ATK (or DEF) pointsprinted on the Monster Card. This does not include an increasefrom an Equip Spell Card or other card effect. If “?” is written as theATK or DEF' date=' the original ATK or DEF is treated as zero.[/quote'] Huge bold lettering is the equivalent of raising your voice, which although might be the next best thing to being right, it often isn't. Trying to be clever, smartass? I'm not wrong by any means, just irrelevant: ? is not less than or equal to 500. I <3 you too. It is when it's assigned a lesser value, which is the case here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrabHelmet Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 Original ATK (or DEF)The Original ATK (or DEF) is the number of ATK (or DEF) pointsprinted on the Monster Card. This does not include an increasefrom an Equip Spell Card or other card effect. If “?” is written as theATK or DEF' date=' the original ATK or DEF is treated as zero.[/quote'] Huge bold lettering is the equivalent of raising your voice, which although might be the next best thing to being right, it often isn't. Trying to be clever, smartass? I'm not wrong by any means, just irrelevant: ? is not less than or equal to 500. And, obviously, you were just making a random statement of fact and most definitely did not mean that Machine Duplication could not be used here. That was certainly not your intention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~Emo~ Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 If i got this card my friends Dragon/Fusion deck would be screwed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toffee. Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 Guys, Face-up monsters with an ATK of '?', Become 0.Having an ATK of '?', Just means you cant search it via Sengan/generic searing cards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 Ridiculously situational. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~ P O L A R I S ~ Posted March 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 Ridiculously situational. I don't consider it much of a stretch that your opponent'll have a monster that's possible for you to make use of, which you'll easily be able to RFP in Macro or its own Decktype. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bunter Dwayne Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 Good for siding if your opponent runs Hopeless or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PikaPerson01 Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 Ridiculously situational. I don't consider it much of a stretch that your opponent'll have a monster that's possible for you to make use of' date=' which you'll easily be able to RFP in Macro or its own Decktype.[/quote'] Only usable in a terrible decktype that auto-loses against the side deck, as well as itself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazer Yoshi Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 I suppose this card's OK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 it dosnt gain the effect making it almost worthless, then it just becomes a possible beatstick in macro... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanAtlus Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 Mwuhahahahaaa! That little thingy is awsum! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonisanoob Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 ---^ HOW! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.