Guest JoshIcy Posted April 6, 2009 Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 I honestly prefer Old OCG because there is more technical rulings to mess with.Plus the terms "advanced summon" etc make me wanna chuck up my food at people... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sid. Posted April 6, 2009 Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 It is so surreal to me.You two are great,Hell, like the greatest. Why are you finding out which is better?If your trying to find out who is better between the two of you, its no one.If Soi taught Icy,Wouldnt the teacher be as equal as the student?Eh. Maybe im just being an idiot here... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saturn of Elemia Posted April 6, 2009 Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 I like Soi Fon's card better. Not only does it make "Time Wizard" more playable, but it also has the potential to litereally half the time needed for "Final Countdown". Icy's card is nice in theory, but giving your opponent a free monster isn't too appealing to me. Nice drawback, though. In the end, I'm going for Soi Fon on this. Sorry, Icy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted April 6, 2009 Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 Lol gotta love concept cards...I didn't cop-out with this one and go with a worked idea. I went with a spur of the moment idea, (literally took me 3min to make the card). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
42.42.564 Posted April 6, 2009 Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 Card Name:Soi: love the name, sounds romantic for a moment..lmaoIcy: toll....ic.. fits ur effect, but i didn't like it personally Picture:Soi: epic, and fits ur card name like other have saidIcy: another of ur abstract looking pics..xD OCG: I don't care. Effect:Soi- perfect support for TW. definitely playable. a close model of a perfect supportive card. It fills up all the weak holes in TW. It also introduces Turn Count manipulating which may be another good support for future monsters that are made based on Turn Count. This card also promotes the "Time" series if anyone is gonna create one ;p Time Sorcerer Yay! Icy: lol. Giving ur opponent a free monster isn't a problem in this case IMO as long as you could keep ur opponent's hand low, and toll does have the effect to accomplish this (not to mention other external support) by discarding your opponent's hand(in a way to solve giving ur opponent a free tribute). I am pretty sure icy choose 300 ATK for a reason here. Also, as some of u said, special summon is zombie's specialty, then discarding cards from your deck to the graveyard may not be a bad thing after all. This effect is pure smart. Originality: ....... never a problem with them at this level of card making >.> Conclusion:Head to head here, soi's card is ideal but icy's card is smart. i will go with icy's card, it truly impressed me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted April 6, 2009 Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 Well, let's sum it up. Soi FonFirst off, it is based around an archetype that doesn't exist, this "Time" archetype. Sure, there are a bunch of cards with Time in their name, but that doesn't make this card any more playable. It also subs as a once per turn Pyro Clock for virtually no cost, which has no impact on the game other than making Final Countdown Decks only half the complete failure they are now. The little support it provides for a card that nobody runs doesn't justify anything. The last effect is also completely useless. I spotted no less than four OCG errors. Icyblue It's a failure of a Spirit, and you should know that. If you plan to give it to your opponent during the End Phase, then just do that. Don't be messing with Spirits if you only do it halfway. Also, if you're going to give your opponent a free monster - a LV3 no less, perfect for medium-level Synchros - put some sort of limitation on it. As in, "this card cannot be Tributed" or "this card cannot be used for a Synchro Summon" or similar. Should your opponent be stupid enough to not Tribute this card, you instantly -2 their hand by taking 300 damage. Not as many OCG errors, though: Only found three. Conclusion: Icy's card is bad, but Soi's card is useless. Icy gets my vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted April 6, 2009 Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 ^: Thanks. I wanted a different look on these and I got it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sander Posted April 6, 2009 Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 Icy. Just like Nitton said, Icy's card is overpowerd, but at least it's not a crappy spell card <__<. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RickiMinaj Posted April 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 Conclusion: Icy's card is bad' date=' but Soi's card is useless. Icy gets my vote.[/quote'] Icy.Just like Nitton said' date=' Icy's card is overpowerd, but at least it's not a crappy spell card <__<.[/quote'] im sorry, i'm a kind of person who can handle constructive critisism, and maybe some critisizing, as long as its not too harsh But that, that was just plain rude. That hurt... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sid. Posted April 6, 2009 Report Share Posted April 6, 2009 Icy. Just like Nitton said' date=' Icy's card is overpowerd, but at least it's not a crappy spell card <__<.[/quote'] Whoah whoah whoah.Seriously.Its a great card. And if you dont think its good, just say Icy for gods sake.Dont act like a jabroni. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JoshIcy Posted April 7, 2009 Report Share Posted April 7, 2009 2nd Page Bump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RickiMinaj Posted April 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 8, 2009 Icy. Just like Nitton said' date=' Icy's card is overpowerd, but at least it's not a crappy spell card <__<.[/quote'] Whoah whoah whoah.Seriously.Its a great card. And if you dont think its good, just say Icy for gods sake.Dont act like a b****. thank youfor defending me, but id advise you not to curse. It can get you into trouble. ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sid. Posted April 8, 2009 Report Share Posted April 8, 2009 thank youfor defending me' date=' but id advise you not to curse. It can get you into trouble. ^^[/quote'] sure.People who get insulted by this guy need a fair fight, right?And no card is worthless. In anyway.Remember that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shocked Posted April 8, 2009 Report Share Posted April 8, 2009 Soi Fon gets my voteBalance and great effect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RickiMinaj Posted April 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 8, 2009 thank youfor defending me' date=' but id advise you not to curse. It can get you into trouble. ^^[/quote'] sure.People who get insulted by this guy need a fair fight, right?And no card is worthless. In anyway.Remember that. that i shall, +rep for being kind and defending ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Umbra Posted April 8, 2009 Report Share Posted April 8, 2009 Conclusion: Icy's card is bad' date=' but Soi's card is useless. Icy gets my vote.[/quote'] Icy.Just like Nitton said' date=' Icy's card is overpowerd, but at least it's not a crappy spell card <__<.[/quote'] im sorry, i'm a kind of person who can handle constructive critisism, and maybe some critisizing, as long as its not too harsh But that, that was just plain rude. That hurt... The fact that you decided to ignore the rest of my post makes it plain obvious that you can't handle criticism. I gave perfect reasons to why your card was useless, which, if some brainpower is used upon reading them, are no less than constructive. I say "It's based around an archetype that doesn't exist" then, it's easy to make the conclusion: "In a 1-card competition, don't use cards belonging to an archetype that relies on other cards of that archetype". Your common sense should have tingled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sid. Posted April 8, 2009 Report Share Posted April 8, 2009 The fact that you decided to ignore the rest of my post makes it plain obvious that you can't handle criticism. I gave perfect reasons to why your card was useless' date=' which, if some brainpower is used upon reading them, are no less than constructive. I say "It's based around an archetype that doesn't exist" then, it's easy to make the conclusion: "In a 1-card competition, don't use cards belonging to an archetype that relies on other cards of that archetype". Your common sense should have tingled.[/quote'] What criticism?All your saying is that the card is useless. Heh.The time ARCHETYPE exists. And even if you say "wikia doesnt have it!"I dont give a funk.Its an archetype if it has backup.And with Soi's amazing card, time is now an archetype. Common sense?Look at yourself dude. Bagging on someones great card isnt criticism. its called being a jabroni. Now, Soi, dont be sad. Your card is great, if not amazing. its people like this guy who think their great and can insult great card makers and their creations.So just keep in mind that your card is great, and ignore this guy.Let other people's minds make him stray away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RickiMinaj Posted April 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 8, 2009 Conclusion: Icy's card is bad' date=' but Soi's card is useless. Icy gets my vote.[/quote'] Icy.Just like Nitton said' date=' Icy's card is overpowerd, but at least it's not a crappy spell card <__<.[/quote'] im sorry, i'm a kind of person who can handle constructive critisism, and maybe some critisizing, as long as its not too harsh But that, that was just plain rude. That hurt... The fact that you decided to ignore the rest of my post makes it plain obvious that you can't handle criticism. I gave perfect reasons to why your card was useless, which, if some brainpower is used upon reading them, are no less than constructive. I say "It's based around an archetype that doesn't exist" then, it's easy to make the conclusion: "In a 1-card competition, don't use cards belonging to an archetype that relies on other cards of that archetype". Your common sense should have tingled. actually, i did read your post, and saying its based on an arcetype that does not exist is quite Pathetic. I dont know why i tend to argue with Childish people like you but let me name 3 cards that have "Time" in their card names. Time SealD TimeTime Machine And then there's also Time Wizard. Now I know its cards that may not work well together, but They, as pointed out above, DO HAVE time in their card names. And trust me, there's a difference between constructive criticism and just flat out plane rudeness. BTW icy, its Wednesday and its time for the comp to end. ^^, since we have agree'd we are equal and i have won the competition, i get 3 reps. But i still have to pay you, i am now closing this Thread so a mod can move it to the finished card section Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 8, 2009 Report Share Posted April 8, 2009 This contest is now over and has been automatically moved to the Finished Contests forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.