fortycal86 Posted May 3, 2009 Report Share Posted May 3, 2009 Its nice to see that 7 of my cards made it. BTW when do you think we will have the Final Phase up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmarian Posted May 3, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 3, 2009 I think that next tournament will be great! Can't wait to build new decks :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommers2008 Posted May 3, 2009 Report Share Posted May 3, 2009 F*** that why can't they vote..?? This is f***ing bull, im sick of you now really, just because both your sets weren't making it you dissallow the votes, Heres a pic for Zepher Angel It won fair and square use it, What is your F***ing problem..?? Sneaking off line, i no u have read this neo im not letting this lie i don't care, i have to go now but i will be back tomorrow and this is not the end of this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abisal Posted May 3, 2009 Report Share Posted May 3, 2009 Howling Spirit of Rot (Ritual category) has 4 votes... just saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmarian Posted May 3, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 3, 2009 Tommers, i don't get why u always freak out like this.. 1st you need different approach , 2nd you are insulting me and i didn't do anything..And Zephyr Angel did win...That pic is okay so we don't need to change its name... And change of name in normal monsters makes text change also..that is point..Read first post, it says this : Only CCG members can vote in this thread. CCG members are everyone that joined this project And u can check time of 1st post edit if u don't trust me. I checked those guys, they are not in project...This is just retarded...And like i told, there will be even more restrictions from next set, only some people that are IN project will be able to vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fortycal86 Posted May 3, 2009 Report Share Posted May 3, 2009 Tommers2008 we cannot have people who aren't in our project vote. That is why those votes don't count. I mean it sucks because some of them voted for some of my cards but, that is the rules. Do you understand? Anyway I don't even think we should have random people in our project vote. I think the only people that should be able to vote are people that submitted cards. So people don't make new accounts and vote there own cards although I don't believe anyone would do that but, I think its the only fair way of doing things. Do you guys think this rule change would be a good idea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmarian Posted May 3, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 3, 2009 Well said, i agree.. BTW, there is around 60 monsters..which is less then half of total number of cards in set..also, count that lot of them is part of themes, synchro, fusions, rituals, etc...That means, not much generic support..We need 6 more cards to round number ( 125 ) , so what u think people, how we should deal with that?They should be all generic monsters so that we got monsters for playing...Should we try to get some from here or we should make new ones..? p.s. if we will do set in way that tournament cards go in set then 2 cards will be thrown out instead Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fortycal86 Posted May 3, 2009 Report Share Posted May 3, 2009 I'm not entirely sure what you mean about generic monsters. Do you mean any monster or monsters that where voted in Categories like Attribute Support or Type Support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmarian Posted May 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 4, 2009 Well, monsters from Other cards section (not all of them) that have sub-type Effect monster and nothing else like Union, Fusion etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fortycal86 Posted May 4, 2009 Report Share Posted May 4, 2009 Sure that seems alright to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommers2008 Posted May 4, 2009 Report Share Posted May 4, 2009 Why is that he disallowed the votes that didn't vote for his sets/cards i just feel it unfair to dock votes for those sets when they got voted in fair and square (My envision set, and someones Radiant Guard set), i bet you wouldn't disallow someone like DeMeNTeD if he voted, that rule wasn't their the other day because i when 1 or 2 people voted i checked to see were they in the project but couldn't find their names but i read the post and it said nothing like that, its a stupid rule i don't care, if by your rules we only take peoples votes that duel we had 5 people that dueled is all last tournament, it is stupid to do that, we should have a lot of different opinions its that simple, and neo i freak out as you call it, because you are a control freak you must have your say on every little thing no matter what if its not your way its not happining, and now if im reading correctly you want to change the monsters voted in to (Spirit,Gemini e.t.c) why, they got voted in as effect cards not as those other sub-types, why change them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adran Posted May 4, 2009 Report Share Posted May 4, 2009 Why is that he disallowed the votes that didn't vote for his sets/cards i just feel it unfair to dock votes for those sets when they got voted in fair and square (My envision set' date=' and someones Radiant Guard set), i bet you wouldn't disallow someone like DeMeNTeD if he voted, that rule wasn't their the other day because i when 1 or 2 people voted i checked to see were they in the project but couldn't find their names but i read the post and it said nothing like that, its a stupid rule i don't care, if by your rules we only take peoples votes that duel we had 5 people that dueled is all last tournament, it is stupid to do that, we should have a lot of different opinions its that simple, and neo i freak out as you call it, because you are a control freak you must have your say on every little thing no matter what if its not your way its not happining, and now if im reading correctly you want to change the monsters voted in to (Spirit,Gemini e.t.c) why, they got voted in as effect cards not as those other sub-types, why change them[/quote'] While I agree on all the major points of this, I believe he was saying we need to pick out cards that DONT have sub-types and stuff. And Radiant Guard was mine. It needs to be fixed a bit anyway, since I goofed a bit on some of the cards and kind of broke them accidentally. Didn't even realize it till I dueled with them. EDIT: Though even with the count for votes I did, Radiant Guard didn't make it in, but Envision did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommers2008 Posted May 4, 2009 Report Share Posted May 4, 2009 Oh okay, i misread it so add more cards that aren't spirit e.t.c okay that could be good... I think radiant guard set was quiet good, yes now that i re-counted i see 5 envision 4 radiant i taught it was 4 each along with ice counters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adran Posted May 4, 2009 Report Share Posted May 4, 2009 Oh okay' date=' i misread it so add more cards that aren't spirit e.t.c okay that could be good... I think radiant guard set was quiet good, yes now that i re-counted i see 5 envision 4 radiant i taught it was 4 each along with ice counters[/quote'] Radiant Guard is excellent. So is my Iron Mirror set that got no votes. I think people just don't like it much as a heavily defensive set. Though there may be balance issues. EDIT: I'm talking about my Iron Mirrors btw. Radiant Guard is an odd set thats a mix of defensive and offensive. Its also one of my most creative sets yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmarian Posted May 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 4, 2009 Tommers, by how u say things and react, you just act like real control freak... U don't accept my opinions at all, but everything must be your way, and then u say that i am doing all my way etc...That is what i don't like... Demented votes wouldn't count either, he is not in project..And fortycal already explained u that is not good that everyone can vote, so read his post again , he told actually everything like i think too... U didn't understand my post, i never told we change monsters that are already in game, but i told that there is 119 cards total and that is not round number so we should choose additional 6 cards so that there is 125 cards total..1 could work too (which would make 120), but like i told, there is not enough "normal" monsters in this set..And i only suggested that, i never told we must do it.. You need to learn difference in that because u are all the time returning on same thing..I accepted almost everything someone suggested in this project if more people was for it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommers2008 Posted May 4, 2009 Report Share Posted May 4, 2009 Its hard to understand what you mean you can't talk proper English, so you don't word phrases correctly, thats why i don't understand you most of time, and if you read, i just said sorry i misread so you try reading b4 telling me to read, why did you say the same thing what i said to you, nothing in this project has being decided by me so how would i be a control freak..?? Now i no i overreacted yesterday, but i see its you that got your set in, not anyone else which i find strange,but that could just be me i just think that it is wrong to do it this way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmarian Posted May 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 4, 2009 Sorry, i was making my post while u posted your...Dude, people voted for them because they was thinking they are good or something..i don't know, ask them...And lot of my cards won, mostly because i posted 99 of them, so why that makes me suspicious...if u want, go and count all votes..I was doing it more then 6 hours, and then only thing i got is pissed off people...And Adran was wrong, Diablos got 6 votes, not 5, and i shown him that on IRC... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommers2008 Posted May 4, 2009 Report Share Posted May 4, 2009 No not diablos, they were clear winners i just taught it strange that the votes for my envision, and adrans radiant guard got dissallowed, i have nothing against your cards, i voted for your ice counters theme sure, but i just taught it wasn't very fair when our sets lost out because of the votes.. do you get what i am saying..?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmarian Posted May 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 4, 2009 Yes i understand... But not all votes are worth equal, so i think everything was fair...There is no reason you don't submit again those themes in next set, and you can also try to make them better so that more people vote for it.. that is only thing i can say.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommers2008 Posted May 4, 2009 Report Share Posted May 4, 2009 Well shuzitsa were better but you said they were op'd which they were, so yea i will more then likely post them again sometime... Anyway lets just forget this and move on and try get set completed... I am going looking for pics as we speak... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmarian Posted May 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 4, 2009 So , will we choose 1 additional card or 6 of them? Great..finally i can relax =) p.s. balance is key of everything...i would love that we got burn theme but it should be balanced like everything..you can transform them to YVD format so i can help u with testing them..i will probably not submit any theme next set So will we choose additional 6 cards or only 1? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommers2008 Posted May 4, 2009 Report Share Posted May 4, 2009 i say 6... is it out of the cards already posted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmarian Posted May 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 4, 2009 Hmm, maybe it would be better that we can submit new ones also?Then it would be like this :-submit any 6 monsters cards that have sub-type Effect and not any other sub-type- each monster must have at least 1 generic effect ( which means they can have for example second effect that support Winged Beast Type monsters )-you can post monsters u already submitted or new ones..it doesn't matter-you can also post monsters from other people that they submitted in this set (in case those cards win, original creators will be counted as their creators and they will get REPs, not u)-end date : ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommers2008 Posted May 4, 2009 Report Share Posted May 4, 2009 Generic effects being?? s&t destruction?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightmarian Posted May 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 4, 2009 Generic is anything doesn't mention in its effect monster Type, Attribute , theme etc. =)Hmm, why u got line across your name? Banned? oO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.