Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Extra Deck: 15 2x Stardust Dragon2x Colossal Fighter1x Light End Dragon1x Dark End Dragon1x Red Dragon Archfiend3x Dark Strike Fighter1x Black Rose Dragon1x Goyo Guardian1x Gaia Knight, the Force of Earth1x Magical Android1x Armory Arm Monsters: 23 3x Caius the Shadow Monarch2x Raiza the Storm Monarch2x Celestia, Lightsworn Angel1x Chaos Sorcerer1x Soul of Purity and Light3x Lumina, Lightsworn Summoner2x Lyla, Lightsworn Sorceress2x Wulf, Lightsworn Beast1x Garoth, Lightsworn Warrior3x Honest1x Plaguespreader Zombie1x Treeborn Frog1x Dandylion Spells: 13 3x Solar Recharge3x Charge of the Light Brigade2x Foolish Burial1x Monster Reincarnation1x Monster Reborn1x Heavy Storm1x Giant Trunade1x Brain Control Traps: 5 1x Torrential Tribute1x Beckoning Light3x Threatening Roar After looking through some of my old stuff, I thought I would revisit this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bunter Dwayne Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Add a Soul Exchange and neg a MST. Welcome back! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akira Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 -1 Soul of Purity and Light+1 Chaos Sorcerer Meh, with 3 Caius and Plague you should just get away with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted May 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Add a Soul Exchange and neg a MST. Welcome back! A lost Battle Phase won't help a Deck like this. And thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bunter Dwayne Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Add a Soul Exchange and neg a MST. Welcome back! A lost Battle Phase won't help a Deck like this. And thanks. Hm...I suppose so... Maybe, then neg MST for Dandylion? Could help in LS, I dunno. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted May 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Add a Soul Exchange and neg a MST. Welcome back! A lost Battle Phase won't help a Deck like this. And thanks. Hm...I suppose so... Maybe' date=' then neg MST for Dandylion? Could help in LS, I dunno.[/quote'] Sounds good to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akira Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 -1 Soul of Purity and Light+1 Chaos Sorcerer Meh' date=' with 3 Caius and Plague you should just get away with it.[/quote'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bunter Dwayne Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Hm, would Reincarnation help? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted May 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 -1 Soul of Purity and Light+1 Chaos Sorcerer Meh' date=' with 3 Caius and Plague you should just get away with it.[/quote'] Missed it. Done. Hm' date=' would Reincarnation help?[/quote'] Maybe. Ill think about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bunter Dwayne Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Now that you've added Sorcerer, Reincarnation would help, I reckon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted May 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Now that you've added Sorcerer' date=' Reincarnation [i']would[/i] help, I reckon. Yeah. I guess it never hurts to be able to recover something in here. What should I get rid of or would it be acceptable to go to 41 cards? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bunter Dwayne Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 41 seems fine. Never hurts in LS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted May 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bunter Dwayne Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Also, I have a question: Why is Armory Arms used? I suppose, in the rare times that you get 2 opponent's monsters that equal LV4 and one's a Tuner, you can then get it out, but other than that I really don't see the point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted May 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Also' date=' I have a question: Why is Armory Arms used? I suppose, in the rare times that you get 2 opponent's monsters that equal LV4 and one's a Tuner, you can then get it out, but other than that I really don't see the point.[/quote'] Not only does it give the only Level 4 Synchro option, it also allows one of your Monsters to run over Monsters it may not normally be able to run over and cause potentially huge damage in the process (sometimes game-winning damage). 1 is enough to do this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bunter Dwayne Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Oh. Fair enough. Like Neos Force, except a 2-Tribute Synchro Monster for everything. Cool. The Deck looks fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smeg Posted May 5, 2009 Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Good sticky. ;D Just 1 Judgment could do. But I can't think of what to remove. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted May 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 5, 2009 Good sticky. ;D Just 1 Judgment could do. But I can't think of what to remove. I would have to run more LS so it could hit the field more consistently but that would just create problems in here. If I were to run it, it would be best in a regular LS Deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HulkTySSJ2 Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 hmmm...i think i tried a deck like this B4 but it wasnt as good as lightsworn for me :(...is this any better for you ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bunter Dwayne Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 hmmm...i think i tried a deck like this B4 but it wasnt as good as lightsworn for me :(...is this any better for you ??? Plain Lightsworn is probably the best variant of Lightsworn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted May 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 hmmm...i think i tried a deck like this B4 but it wasnt as good as lightsworn for me :(...is this any better for you ??? Plain Lightsworn is probably the best variant of Lightsworn. It is. So far, no other LS variant in this Format is able to best regular LS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bunter Dwayne Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 hmmm...i think i tried a deck like this B4 but it wasnt as good as lightsworn for me :(...is this any better for you ??? Plain Lightsworn is probably the best variant of Lightsworn. It is. So far' date=' no other LS variant in this Format is able to best regular LS.[/quote'] Although, Twilight comes close... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Judgment Dragon Posted May 6, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 hmmm...i think i tried a deck like this B4 but it wasnt as good as lightsworn for me :(...is this any better for you ??? Plain Lightsworn is probably the best variant of Lightsworn. It is. So far' date=' no other LS variant in this Format is able to best regular LS.[/quote'] Although, Twilight comes close... Twilight isnt as consistent. At least not in this format. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bunter Dwayne Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 No, I disagree. It's more resistant to Light-Imprisoning Mirror, with the added bonus of Chaos Sorcerer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akira Posted May 6, 2009 Report Share Posted May 6, 2009 Most LS decks run Necro Gardna standard, and as a result can run Chaos Sorcerer anyway without actually being classed as Twilight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.