Jump to content

Why are these banned?


Recommended Posts

to put a end to this...

NEVER ASK "WHY" A CARD IS BANNED

If you can freaken read and have a brain then just read what the damned card says,and think to yaself...hmmm why is it banworthy....You don't put it on a damned thread on a damned forum that isn't even Affiliated with Konami.

Honestly the answer is staring at you right in the face when you read those cards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there are plenty of cards that dont seem banworthy on their own.

many are just involved in infinite loops.

that argument is bad.

 

raiza does belong at one.

 

im not going to argue semantics with trolls.

 

let me just rephrase my original post then:

is there any particular reason these cards are banned, aside from their own effects?

yata, for example, isnt terribly broken, but hes banned all the same for his locks.

i dont even know why tsuko is banned, but i can assume theres something of the same caliber wrong with her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most trolls aren't able to lampshade their trolling by saying "troll" in every post and get away with it - megamaster used the word "spike" instead of "troll", and he was about as successful as America was in Vietnam. Therefore, I can only conclude that Tronta is either:

 

1) An extremely skilled troll.

2) A mediocre troll who has chosen trolling grounds in which trolling skill is not necessary.

3) An idiot.

 

Take your pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most trolls aren't able to lampshade their trolling by saying "troll" in every post and get away with it - megamaster used the word "spike" instead of "troll"' date=' and he was about as successful as America was in Vietnam. Therefore, I can only conclude that Tronta is either:

 

1) An extremely skilled troll.

2) A mediocre troll who has chosen trolling grounds in which trolling skill is not necessary.

3) An idiot.

 

Take your pick.

[/quote']

 

I PICK 3!

 

I feel stupid for asking but isnt a troll someone who bullies someone online?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most trolls aren't able to lampshade their trolling by saying "troll" in every post and get away with it - megamaster used the word "spike" instead of "troll"' date=' and he was about as successful as America was in Vietnam. Therefore, I can only conclude that Tronta is either:

 

1) An extremely skilled troll.

2) A mediocre troll who has chosen trolling grounds in which trolling skill is not necessary.

3) An idiot.

 

Take your pick.

[/quote']

 

I PICK 3!

 

I feel stupid for asking but isnt a troll someone who bullies someone online?

 

No.

 

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Troll

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most trolls aren't able to lampshade their trolling by saying "troll" in every post and get away with it - megamaster used the word "spike" instead of "troll"' date=' and he was about as successful as America was in Vietnam. Therefore, I can only conclude that Tronta is either:

 

1) An extremely skilled troll.

2) A mediocre troll who has chosen trolling grounds in which trolling skill is not necessary.

3) An idiot.

 

Take your pick.

[/quote']

 

I PICK 3!

 

I feel stupid for asking but isnt a troll someone who bullies someone online?

 

No.

 

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/Troll

 

... OMG! I was expecting a Crab Helmet slaughter! O.O Wow Crab you suprised me...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest setojim

witch and cyber jar not banworthy?

 

cyber is a dark hole, and a plus 5+ to both players.

 

witch is a monarch, LS, glad, DAD, etc fetcher.

 

Ridiculous and banned cards are ridiculous and banned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lolycm @ azure.

 

my question still wasnt answered >.>

is there any particular loop or lock in the current game that would make either of these disgustingly banworthy?

 

and explain to me why raiza doesnt belong at 1?

for quite some time it seems konami, in their infinite wisdom (straight faced) agreed with me on that at least. their bumping it to 2 seems to be an appeasement to all those who ran perfect circle, then teledad. seems like they thought we were too terribad to be able to come up with a new way to use the same deck. or maybe they just wanted to keep the deck build competitive with lightsworn (lol k.)

phoenix wing is the trap equivalent of raiza.

notice the differences in these two cards that establish the differences in balance:

pwwb is a trap, which means its chainable, active on either players turn, but slow in that it must be set for a turn first. you have to discard one as well. so its a -2 to basically compulse + yata.

raiza needs a tribute, which is easy as hell, provides a 24 beater, which is the general hill for midlevel monsters. then he removes one from the field, not destroys, but removes, so it isnt negateable conventionally. it returns it to the top of the deck, which effectively kills the next draw.

so hes a -1 yata+compulse+24lolatk

 

hes unbalanced.

i dont even like caius removing. but hes not an abortion at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest PikaPerson01
my question still wasnt answered >.>

is there any particular loop or lock in the current game that would make either of these disgustingly banworthy?

 

A card doesn't need to be involved in a loop or a lock to be considered banworthy.

 

Pot of Greed isn't involved in a loop, but because of the fact that its just pure Card Advantage, it's earned a spot on the banlist.

 

Something about Raiza and PWWB

 

 

Other then stating their effects, I don't understand your argument.

 

But if we were to follow this train of thought, would you agree that Monster Reincarnation should be banned because Mind Trust exists? Monster Reincarnation discards a card and brings back any monster to your hand. Mind Trust tributes a monster on the field and returns a tuner to your hand that's less than or equal to half the tributed monster's level. They're both a -1, and they both return monsters to the hand. One is superior to the other, but that doesn't mean it's bannable.

 

But maybe I'm going about this the wrong way. Why do you think Raiza's effect is overpowered? And don't start off by repeating it's effect. We know what the card does. What about it is overpowered in your opinion?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Witch of the Black Forest sould be semi-limited...

 

... ... ... ... Are you freakin serious? Honestly? Every single reason Witch should be banned was named in this topic and you say it deserves to be at 2...? Honestly? Are you freakin serious?

 

OK maybe not...

 

XD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well, neither reincarnate nor whatever other trolly card are really that bad. raiza bouncing to teh top of the deck free of real cost is a problem for me. cards like back to square one and pwwb both have that same niev effect, but they cost something. raiza just requires a tribute, which really isnt hard between gks, freeporn, malicious, and other such jank. and in addition to getting the same bounce as the other guys for the same real cost, you get a 2400 monster. thats obnoxious.

 

anyways:

im aware that it doesnt /have/ to be in a loop or lock. im just asking if there is one that pushes these guys over the top. im guessing no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...