Maliki Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Here is one of 2 of my cards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skytin Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Good idea, nice pics! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maliki Posted May 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 What is my rating Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yangninja Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 What is my rating Its under 9000 but the effect is too plain. Make it more advanced5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maliki Posted May 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Are you crazy 1 thing made me 5/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Windowlicker Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 Are you crazy 1 thing made me 5/10 Actually' date=' it was one thing that summed up many things. If your want the OCG for it, go to the OCG thread, because if you'd copied it from there at least it'd be basic [b']and[/b] correct. The picture for the first card doesn't have a background, and the second one looks like a real picture, which it shouldn't. The general idea is meh: acceptable but a tad clichéd. That is the reason why you get 5/10. Happy trails. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kroama Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 IMO you should put the effect as 'This card cannot be in face-down Defense Position.' that makes it unaffected by a few cards, and makes this underpowered card a little better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crosspath Posted May 14, 2009 Report Share Posted May 14, 2009 hmm 6/10. Effect doesn't make sence to me. You can not special summon this monster in face-down defence position? it can only be special summoned so it cant any way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.